American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council, on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
2.
AstonC.BrownD. L. (2021). Progress or setback: Revisiting the current state of assessment practices of Black children. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00308-7
3.
AstonC.SmithL.WoodsI. (2022). Examining the importance of rooting out bias through culturally responsive clinical judgement when assessing Black children. School Psychology International, 43(6), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343221075352
4.
CockcroftK.AllowayT.CopelloE.MilliganR. (2015). A cross-cultural comparison between South African and British students on the Wechsler adult intelligence scales third edition (WAIS-III). Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00297
5.
CooperS. (2014). A synopsis of South African psychology from apartheid to democracy. American Psychologist, 69(8), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037569
6.
GrapinS. L. (2022). Centering the contributions, perspectives, and experiences of Black school psychologists: Commentary on proctor (2022). School Psychology International, 43(6), 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343221111049
7.
GravesS.JohnsonK.PhillipsS.JonesM.JacobsM. (2022). Quantifying the linguistic demands of the oral directions of preschool cognitive assessments. Psychology in the Schools. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22789
8.
GravesS. L. (2009). Albert Sidney Beckham: The first African American school psychologist. School Psychology International, 30(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034308101847
9.
GravesS. L. Jr.FrohwerkA. (2009). Multilevel modeling and school psychology: A review and practical example. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016160
10.
GravesS. L.SmithL. V.NicholsK. D. (2021). Is the WISC-V a fair test for Black children: Factor structure in an urban public school sample. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00306-9
11.
GravesS.MitchellA. (2011). Is the moratorium over? African American psychology professionals’ views on intelligence testing in response to changes to federal policy. Journal of Black Psychology, 37(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798410394177
JohnsonK. P.GravesS. L. Jr.JonesM. A. Jr.PhillipsS.JacobsM. (2022). Understanding African American vernacular English and reading achievement: Implications for the science of reading. School Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000516
14.
LindoE. J. (2006). The African American presence in reading intervention experiments. Remedial and Special Education, 27(3), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270030301
15.
McGillR.WardT.CanivezG. (2020). Use of translated and adapted versions of the WISC-V: Caveat emptor. School Psychology International, 41(3), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034320903790
PienaarI.Shuttleworth-EdwardsA.KlopperC.RadloffS. (2017). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition preliminary normative guidelines for educationally disadvantaged Xhosa-speaking individuals. South African Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246316654805
18.
ProctorS. L. (2022). From Beckham until now: Recruiting, retaining, and including Black people and Black thought in school psychology. School Psychology International, 43(6), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343211066016
19.
ProctorS. L.GravesS. L. Jr.EschR. C. (2012). Assessing African American students for specific learning disabilities: The promises and perils of response to intervention. The Journal of Negro Education, 81(3), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.81.3.0268
20.
PuranikC.BranumM. L.WashingtonJ. A. (2020). The relation between dialect density and the codevelopment of writing and reading in African American children. Child Development, 91(4), 866–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13318
21.
RoivainenE. (2019). European And American WAIS IV norms: Cross-national differences in perceptual reasoning, processing speed and working memory subtest scores. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(6), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12581
22.
Shuttleworth-EdwardsA. B. (2012). Guidelines for the use of the WAIS-IV with WAIS-III cross-cultural normative indications. South African Journal of Psychology, 42(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631204200312
23.
Shuttleworth-EdwardsA. B. (2016). Generally representative is representative of none: Commentary on the pitfalls of IQ test standardization in multicultural settings. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(7), 975–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1204011
24.
Shuttleworth-EdwardsA. B. (2018). Response to Taylor and de Beer (2018) on population based norms and IQ testing. South African Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246317747170
25.
Shuttleworth-EdwardsA. B.KempR. D.RustA. L.MuirheadJ. G.HartmanN. P.RadloffS. E. (2004). Cross-cultural effects on IQ test performance: A review and preliminary normative indications on WAIS-III test performance. Journal Of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26(7), 903–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490510824
26.
SunderaramanP.ZahodneL. B.ManlyJ. J. (2016). A commentary on ‘generally representative is representative of none: Pitfalls of IQ test standardization in multicultural settings’ by A.B. Shuttleworth-Edwards. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(7), 999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1211321
27.
TaylorN. (2016). Generally representative is generally representative: Comment on Shuttleworth-Edwards. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(7), 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1213884
28.
TaylorN.de BeerJ. (2018). Response to Shuttleworth-Edwards (2017), country-wide norms declared obsolete: Best practice alert for intelligence quotient testing in a multicultural context. South African Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246317747743
29.
WashingtonJ. A.Branum-MartinL.SunC.Lee-JamesR. (2018). The impact of dialect density on the growth of language and reading in African American children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0063
30.
WichertsJ. M. (2016). The importance of measurement invariance in neurocognitive ability testing. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(7), 1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1205136
31.
WichertsJ. M.DolanC. V.CarlsonJ. S.van der MaasH. L. (2010a). Another failure to replicate Lynn’s estimate of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 155–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.010
32.
WichertsJ. M.DolanC. V.van der MaasH. L. (2010b). The dangers of unsystematic selection methods and the representativeness of 46 samples of African test-takers. Intelligence, 38(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.11.003
33.
WoodsI.GravesS. L. (2021). The fortieth anniversary of Larry P. V. Riles: Cognitive assessment and Black children. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(2), 137–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00373-6
34.
WorrellF. C.RobersonC. C. B. (2016). 2014 Standards for educational and psychological testing: Implications for ethnic minority youth. In GravesS. L. Jr.BlakeJ. J. (Eds.), Psychoeducational assessment and intervention for ethnic minority youth: Evidence-based approaches (pp. 41–57). American Psychological Association.