Positive Family Environment,General Distress,Subjective Well-Being,and Academic Engagement among High School Students Before and During the COVID-19 Outbreak
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2022
Positive Family Environment,General Distress,Subjective Well-Being,and Academic Engagement among High School Students Before and During the COVID-19 Outbreak
The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the family dynamics of most people worldwide as well as the mode in which students take classes. The impact of such changes on students’ well-being, academic engagement, and general distress remains unknown. Therefore, this study aims to test the structural relations among positive family environment (a measure of Positive Home-Based Parent Involvement [HBI]), subjective well-being (SWB), general distress, and academic engagement, focusing on Mexican high school students. A longitudinal study was conducted covering two time points: before (T1) and during (T2) the COVID-19 outbreak. A sample of 502 students answered questionnaires in T1 whereas 111 did so in T2. Analyses were conducted using Mplus software. Principal results showed that the positive and significant association between positive family environment and SWB did not substantially change from T1 to T2, whereas the relation between positive family environment and academic engagement became stronger. Data revealed that a positive family environment can play an important role in promoting academic engagement among adolescent students despite the risks brought about by sanitary lockdowns and the increase of family interactions. Results are discussed highlighting the importance of positive family environments and HBI on academic outcomes for Mexican high school students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkatM.KaratasK. (2020). Psychological effects of Covid-19 pandemic on society and its reflections on education. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44336
2.
AntaramianS. P.HuebnerE. S.HillsK. J.ValoisR. F. (2010). A dual-factor model of mental health: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of youth functioning. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(4), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01049.x
3.
ArandaC.GaxiolaJ. C.GonzálezS.ValenzuelaE. (2015). Construcción y validación de una escala de ambiente familiar [construction and validity of the family environment scale]. XXIII Congreso Mexicano de Psicología, 610–613. Cancún, Quintana Roo, México.
4.
BakkerA.CaiJ.EnglishL.KaiserG.MesaV.Van DoorenW. (2019). Beyond small, medium, or large: Points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4
5.
BarryT. J.VinogradM.BoddezY.RaesF.ZinbargR.MinekaS.CraskeM. G. (2019). Reduced autobiographical memory specificity affects general distress through poor social support. Memory (Hove, England), 27(7), 916–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1607876
6.
BasharpoorS.HeidariF.NarimaniM.BarahmandU. (2020). School adjustment, engagement and academic self-concept: Family, child, and school factors. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2020.6
7.
BoonkL.GijselaersH. J.RitzenH.Brand-GruwelS. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.001
8.
BurnettA. C.LeeK. J.CheongJ. L. Y.De LucaC. R.RobertsG.WoodS. J.DoyleL. W.AndersonP. J. (2017). Family functioning and mood and anxiety symptoms in adolescents born extremely preterm. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 38(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000368
9.
CorralV. V.FríasA. M.GaxiolaR. J.FraijoS. B.TapiaF. C.CorralF. A. (2014). Ambientes positivos: Ideando entornos sostenibles para el bienestar humano y la calidad ambiental [positive environments: Devising sustainable environments for human wellness and environmental quality]. Pearson.
10.
CorralF. N. S.VelardezS. S. N.FríasA. M.CoronaE. A.WatsonD. (2019). Concurrent validity and reliability of two short forms of the mood and anxiety symptom questionnaire in a student sample from northwest Mexico. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavior Assessment, 41(2), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09738-x
11.
ChenJ. J. L. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77–127. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.2.77-127
12.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
13.
DatuJ. A. D.KingR. B. (2018). Subjective well-being is reciprocally associated with academic engagement: A two-wave longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 69, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.05.007
14.
DayE.DottererA. M. (2018). Parental involvement and adolescent academic outcomes: Exploring differences in beneficial strategies across racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1332–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0853-2
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1
17.
de FigueiredoC. S.SandreP. C.PortugalL. C. L.Mázala-de-OliveiraT.da Silva ChagasL.RaonyÍ.FerreiraE. S.Giestal-de-AraujoE.dos SantosA. A.BomfimP. O.-S. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic impact on children and adolescents’ mental health: Biological, environmental, and social factors. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 106(2), 110171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110171
18.
DumasT.M.EllisW.LittD. M. (2020). What does adolescent substance use look like during the COVID-19 pandemic? Examining changes in frequency, social contexts, and pandemic-related predictors. Journal of Adolescents Health, 67(3), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.06.018
19.
DvorskyM. R.BreauxR.BeckerS. P. (2021). Finding ordinary magic in extraordinary times: Child and adolescent resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 30(11), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01583-8
20.
EndersC. K. (2001). The performance of the full information maximum likelihood estimator in multiple regression models with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(5), 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971482
21.
EsnaolaI.BenitoM.Antonio-AgirreI.AxpeI.LorenzoM. (2019). Longitudinal measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale in adolescence. Quality of Life Research, 28(10), 2831–2837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02224-7
22.
EspositoS.GiannittoN.SquarciaA.NegliaC.ArgentieroA.MinichettiP.CotugnoN.PrincipiN. (2021). Development of psychological problems among adolescents during school closures because of the COVID-19 lockdown phase in Italy: A cross-sectional survey. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 8, 975. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.628072
23.
FantuzzoJ. W.McWayneC. M.PerryM. A.ChildsS. (2004). Multiple dimensions of family involvement and their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086262
24.
FernándezZ. A.GoñiE.CaminoI.ZulaikaL. M. (2016). Family and school context in school engagement. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 9(2), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.09.001
25.
FiedlerK.BeierS. (2014). Affect and cognitive processes in educational contexts. In PekrunR.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 36–55). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-09239-003
26.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
27.
FroilandJ. M. (2021). A comprehensive model of preschool through high school parent involvement with emphasis on the psychological facets. School Psychology International, 42(2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034320981393
28.
FroilandJ. M.PetersonA.DavisonM. L. (2013). The long-term effects of early parent involvement and parent expectation in the USA. School Psychology International, 34(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312454361
29.
FroilandJ. M.WorrellF. C. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21901
30.
FroilandJ. M.WorrellF. C.OlenchakF. R.KowalskiM. J. (2021). Positive and negative time attitudes, intrinsic motivation, behavioral engagement and substance use among urban adolescents. Addiction Research & Theory, 29(4), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2020.1857740
31.
GanY.BiligeS. (2019). Parental involvement in home-based education and children’s academic achievement in China. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 47(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8491
32.
GaxiolaR. J.GaxiolaV. E.CorralF. N. S.EscobedoH. P. (2020). Positive learning environment, academic engagement, and self-regulated learning in high school students. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 23(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2020.23.2.11
33.
GaxiolaR. J. C.GaxiolaV. E.EscobedoH. P.CornejoY. A. L. (2019). Ambiente de aprendizaje positivo, ambientes inseguros y compromiso académico de estudiantes de bachillerato [positive learning environment, insecure environments and academic engagement of high school students]. Memorias del XXXVII Congreso Interamericano de Psicología, 435–436. La Habana, Cuba.
34.
HarrisC.VazsonyiA. T.ÖzdemirY.SağkalA. S. (2020). Family environment and school engagement: An investigation of cross-lagged effects. Journal of Adolescence, 84(7), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.08.006
35.
HeffnerA. L.AntaramianS. P. (2016). The role of life satisfaction in predicting student engagement and achievement. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1681–1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9665-1
36.
HillN. E.TysonD. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362
37.
Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación en México (INEE) (2019). Panorama Educativo de México 2018 [Educational overview of Mexico]. Indicadores del Sistema Educativo Nacional. Educación básica y media superior. https://www.inee.edu.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/P1B117.pdf
38.
JamesA.G.RudyD.DottererA. (2019). Longitudinal examination of relations between school- and home-based parent involvement and GPA across ethnic groups. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(11), 3000–3010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01475-9
JonesE.MitraA. K.BhuiyanA. R. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on mental health in adolescents: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2470. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052470
41.
KuhfeldM.SolandJ.TarasawaB.JohnsonA.RuzekE.LiuJ. (2020). Projecting the potential impact of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189 × 20965918
42.
LawrenceK. C.FakuadeO. V. (2021). Parental involvement, learning participation and online learning commitment of adolescent learners during the COVID-19 lockdown. Research in Learning Technology, 29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2544
LeiH.CuiY.ZhouW. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(3) 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
45.
LiJ. (2010). Effects of full information maximum likelihood, expectation maximization, multiple imputation, and similar response pattern imputation on structural equation modeling with incomplete and multivariate nonnormal data [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1281387395
46.
LiY.LernerR. M. (2013). Interrelations of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive school engagement in high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9857-5
47.
LiY.LernerJ.V.LernerR. M. (2010). Personal and ecological assets and academic competence in early adolescence: The mediating role of school engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(7), 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9535-4
48.
LorenzoN. E.ZeytinogluS.MoralesS.ListokinJ.AlmasA. N.DegnanK. A.HendersonH.Chronis-TuscanoA.FoxN.A. (2021). Transactional associations between parent and late adolescent internalizing symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderating role of avoidant coping. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(3), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01374-z
49.
LuckettT.ButowP.N.KingM.T.OguchiM.HeadingG.HacklN. A.RankinN.PriceM. A. (2010). A review and recommendations for optimal outcome measures of anxiety, depression and general distress in studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for English-speaking adults with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 18(10), 1241–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0932-8
50.
MagsonN. R.FreemanJ. Y. A.RapeeR. M.RichardsonC. E.OarE.FardoulyJ. (2021) Risk and protective factors for prospective changes in adolescent mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01332-9
51.
MakH. W.FoscoG. M.FeinbergM. E. (2018). The role of family for youth friendships: Examining a social anxiety mechanism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(2), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0738-9
52.
McEwanR. C.DownieR. (2019). Patterns of academic success and engagement among college students with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 33(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2018.1483216
53.
MoscardinoU.DicataldoR.RochM.CarboneM.MammarellaI. C. (2021). Parental stress during COVID-19: A brief report on the role of distance education and family resources in an Italian sample. Current Psychology, 40(11), 5749–5752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01454-8
54.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2009). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
NavarroD.MontserratC.MaloS.GonzálezM.CasasF.CrousG. (2017) Subjective well-being: What do adolescents say?Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12215
57.
NetoT.AnbarD.AnbarI.AnbarJ.FilhoI. (2020) Guidelines for return to presential classes: Consensus proposal in accordance with the national and international health regulatory agencies. Creative Education, 11(12), 2627–2638. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.1112195
58.
O’ReillyA.TibbsM.BoothA.DoyleE.McKeagueB.MooreJ. (2021). A rapid review investigating the potential impact of a pandemic on the mental health of young people aged 12-25 years. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 38(3), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.106
59.
PalomarL. J.VictorioE. A. (2014). Determinants of subjective well-being in adolescent children of recipients of the oportunidades human development program in Mexico. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0407-7
60.
PanJ.ZaffJ. F.DonlanA. E. (2017). Social support and academic engagement among reconnected youth: Adverse life experiences as a moderator. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(4), 890–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12322
61.
PascoeM. C.HetrickS. E.ParkerA. G. (2020). The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1596823
62.
PatallE. A.CooperH.RobinsonJ. C. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039–1101. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325185
63.
PekrunR.LinnenbrinkG. L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–292). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12
64.
PigaianiY.ZoccanteL.ZoccaA.ArzentonA.MenegolliM.FadelS.RuggeriM.ColizziM. (2020). Adolescent lifestyle behaviors, coping strategies and subjective wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online student survey. Healthcare (Basel), 8(4), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040472
65.
PrimeH.WadeM.BrowneD. T. (2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 75(5), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000660
66.
RekartK. N.MinekaS.ZinbargR. E.GriffithJ. W. (2007). Perceived family environment and symptoms of emotional disorders: The role of perceived control, attributional style, and attachment. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 31(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-007-9131-4
67.
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1
68.
ReschlyA. L.HuebnerE. S.AppletonJ. J.AntaramianS. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents’ engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20306
69.
RudnevM.LytkinaE.DavidovE.SchmidtP.ZickA. (2018). Testing measurement invariance for a second-order factor. A cross-national test of the alienation scale. Methods, Data, Analyses, 12(1), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2017.11
70.
SánchezT. D.RoblesB. M. A.ValenciaN. N. (2021). Do psychological strengths protect college students confined by COVID-19 to emotional distress? The role of gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 171(3), 110507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110507
71.
Secretaria de Educación Pública (SEP) (2017). Plan nacional para la evaluación de los aprendizajes (PLANEA) de educación Media superior [national plan for learning evaluation (PLANEA) of upper secondary education]. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. https://www.gob.mx/sep/prensa/comunicado-481-publica-sep-resultados-de-planea-2016
SegreG.CampiR.ScarpelliniF.ClavennaA.ZanettiM.CartabiaM.BonatiM. (2021). Interviewing children: The impact of the COVID-19 quarantine on children’s perceived psychological distress and changes in routine. BMC Pediatrics, 21(1),231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02704-1
74.
SoestT. VBakkenA.PedersenWSlettenM. A. (2020). Life satisfaction among adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, 140(10). https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.20.0437
SteinmayrR.WirthweinL.ModlerL.BarryM. M. (2019). Development of subjective well-being in adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research And Public Health, 16(19), 3690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193690
77.
TerluinB.van MarwijkH. W.AdèrH. J.de VetH. C.PenninxB. W.HermensM. L.van BoeijenC. Avan BalkomA. Jvan der KlinkJ. JStalmanW. A. (2006). The four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ): A validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. BMC Psychiatry, 6(34), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-6-34
78.
van ZoonenW.ter HoevenC. L. (2021). Disruptions and general distress for essential and nonessential employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09744-5
79.
WilliamsA. L.CraskeM. G.MinekaS.ZinbargR. E. (2021). Reciprocal effects of personality and general distress: Neuroticism vulnerability is stronger than scarring. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 130(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000635.supp
80.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2014). Health for the world’s adolescents: A second chance in the second decade: Summary. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/112750
WuX.GaiX.WangW. (2020). Subjective well-being and academic performance among middle schoolers: A two-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 84(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.011
83.
YehZ. T.HuangY.LiuS. I. (2016). Maternal depression and adolescent emotions: The role of family functioning. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 25(7), 2189–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0399-4
84.
YuanK.BentlerP. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
85.
ZhangX. C.KuchinkeL.WoudM. L.VeltenJ.MargrafJ. (2017). Survey method matters: Online/offline questionnaires and face-to-face or telephone interviews differ. Computers in Human Behavior, 71(1), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.006
