Evaluating the impact of a defender role-play intervention on adolescent’s defender intentions and responses towards name-calling

Abstract

Researchers and anti-bullying organisations have increasingly turned their attention to the role of bystanders in tackling bullying and peer victimisation (e.g. name-calling). The objective of this study was to develop and assess the impact of a role-play programme designed to strengthen adolescent’s defending behaviour to name-calling. This was measured in two contexts: defending intentions in an outgroup name-calling scenario and cyber-defender behaviour in a scripted online peer interaction. Participants (N = 121, M_age = 12.90 years) were randomly assigned to either a role-play condition or a control condition. Results showed that defender intentions in an outgroup name-calling scenario were higher in the role-play condition, compared to the control; in addition, cyber-defender behaviour was more likely and quicker in the role-play condition, compared to the control. Defender self-efficacy was found to be significantly higher in the role-play condition, and mediated the effect of the role-play programme on defender intentions. Findings also revealed that defender intentions were positively correlated with cyber-defender behaviour, highlighting a link between intentions and behaviour. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords

name-calling role-play defender self-efficacy defending cyber-defending intergroup

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Cameron

(2014) What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in-group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues 70: 167–182. doi:10.1111/josi.12053.

Aboud

F. E.

Joong

(2008) Intergroup name-calling and conditions for creating assertive bystanders. In: Levy

S. R.

Killen

(eds) Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–260.

Argyle

(1994) The psychology of interpersonal behaviour, 5th ed. London, UK: Penguin Group.

Atlas

R. S.

Pepler

D. J.

(1998) Observations of bullying in the classroom. The Journal of Educational Research 92: 86–99. doi:10.1080/00220679809597580.

Bandura

(1995) Self-efficacy in changing societies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Barchia

Bussey

(2011) Predictors of student defenders or peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors. International Journal of Behavioral Development 35: 289–297. doi:10.1177/0165025410396746.

Barhight

L. R.

Hubbard

J. A.

Hyde

C. T.

(2013) Children’s physiological and emotional reactions to witnessing bullying predict bystander intervention. Child Development 84: 375–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01839.

Bish

Sutton

Golombok

(2000) Predicting uptake of a routine cervical smear test: A comparison of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour. Psychology and Health 15: 35–50. doi:10.1080/08870440008400287.

Blaya

(2019) Cyberhate: A review and content analysis of intervention strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior 45: 163–172. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.006.

10.

Boal

(2008) Theatre of the oppressed, London, UK: Pluto Press.

11.

Campbell

M. A.

Slee

P. T.

Spears

Butler

Kift

(2013) Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychology International 34: 613–629. doi:10.1177/0143034313479698.

12.

Chaux

Velasquez

A. M.

Schultze-Krumbholz

Scheithauer

(2016) Effects of the cyberbullying prevention program Media Heroes (Medienhelden) on traditional bullying. Aggressive Behavior 42: 157–165. doi:10.1002/ab.21637.

13.

Datta

Cornell

Huang

(2016) Aggressive attitudes and prevalence of bullying bystander behaviour in middle school. Psychology in the Schools 53: 804–816. doi:10.1002/pits.21944.

14.

DeSmet

Veldeman

Poels

Bastiaensens

Van Cleemput

Vandebosch

De Bourdeaudhuij

(2014) Determinants of self-reported bystander behaviour in cyberbullying incidents amongst adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking 17: 207–215. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0027.

15.

Forsberg

Thornberg

Samuelsson

(2014) Bystanders to bullying: Fourth- to seventh-grade students’ perspectives on their reactions. Research Papers in Education 29: 557–576. doi:10.1080/02671522.2013.878375.

16.

Freis

S. D.

Gurung

R. A.

(2013) A Facebook analysis of helping behavior in online bullying. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 2: 11–19. doi:10.1037/a0030239.

17.

Garaigordobil

Martinez-Valderrey

(2015) Effects of Cyberprogram 2.0 on “face-to-face” bullying, cyberbullying, and empathy. Psicothema 27: 45–51. doi:10.7334/psicothema2014.78.

18.

Garandeau

C. F.

Poskiparta

Salmivalli

(2014) Tackling acute cases of school bullying in the KiVa anti-bullying program: A comparison of two approaches. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 42: 981–991. doi:10.1007/s10802-014-9861-1.

19.

Gini

Albiero

Benelli

Altoè

(2008) Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence 31: 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002.

20.

Johnson

(2001) Helping children to manage emotions which trigger aggressive acts: An approach through drama in school. Early Child Development and Care 166: 109–118. doi:10.1080/0300443011660109.

21.

Joronen

Konu

Rankin

H. S.

Åstedt-Kurki

(2012) An evaluation of a drama program to enhance social relationships and anti-bullying at elementary school: A controlled study. Health Promotion International 27: 5–14. doi:10.1093/heapro/dar012.

22.

Kärnä

Voeten

Little

T. D.

Poskiparta

Kaljonen

Salmivalli

(2011) A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4–6. Child Development 82: 311–330. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.

23.

Lamb

L. M.

Bigler

R. S.

Liben

L. S.

Green

V. A.

(2009) Teaching children to confront peers’ sexist remarks: Implications for theories of development and educational practice. Sex Roles 61: 361–382. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9634-4.

24.

Luo

Bussey

(2019) The selectivity of moral disengagement in defenders of cyberbullying: Contextual moral disengagement. Computers in Human Behavior 93: 318–325. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.038.

25.

Meter

Chen

Lee

(2019) Defending behavior of peer victimization in school and cyber context during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of individual and peer-relational characteristics. Psychological Bulletin 145: 891–928. doi:10.1037/bul0000205.

26.

Midgett

Doumas

D. M.

(2019) The impact of a brief bullying bystander intervention on depressive symptoms. Journal of Counselling & Development 97: 270–280. doi:10.1002/jcad.12267.

27.

Nickerson

Aloe

Livingston

Feeley

(2014) Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment. Journal of Adolescence 37: 391–400. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.003.

28.

Palmer

S. B.

Abbott

(2017) Bystander responses to bias-based bullying in schools: A developmental intergroup approach. Child Development Perspectives 12: 39–44. doi:10.1111/cdep.12253.

29.

Poteat

V. P.

Vecho

(2016) Who intervenes against homophobic behavior? Attributes that distinguish active bystanders. Journal of School Psychology 54: 17–28. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2015.10.002.

30.

Pöyhönen

Juvonen

Salmivalli

(2012) Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Social Development 21: 722–741. doi:10.1111/j.1467-95072012.00662.

31.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40: 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.

32.

Salmivalli

(2014) Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory Into Practice 53: 286–292. doi:10.1080/00405841.2014.947222.

33.

Salmivalli

Kärnä

Poskiparta

(2010) From peer putdowns to peer support: A theoretical model and how it translated into a national anti-bullying program. In: Jimerson

S. R.

Swearer

S. M.

Espelage

D. L.

(eds) Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective, New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 441–454.

34.

Smith

P. K.

Ananiadou

Cowie

(2003) Interventions to reduce school bullying. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 48: 591–599. doi:10.1177/070674370304800905.

35.

Tanrikulu

(2018) Cyberbullying prevention and intervention programs in schools: A systematic review. School Psychology International 39: 74–91. doi:10.1177/0143034317745721.

36.

Thornberg

Jungert

(2013) Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence 36: 475–483. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003.

37.

Timmons-Mitchell

Levesque

D. A.

Harris

L. A.

Flannery

D. J.

Falcone

(2016) Pilot test of StandUp, an online school-based bullying prevention program. Children and Schools 38: 71–79. doi:10.1093/cs/cdw010.

38.

Topcu

Erdur-Baker

Ö.

(2012) Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. School Psychology International 33: 550–561. doi:10.1177/0143034312446882.

39.

Trach

Hymel

Waterhouse

Neale

(2010) Bystander responses to school bullying: A cross-sectional investigation of grade and sex differences. Canadian Journal of School Psychology 25: 114–130. doi:10.1177/0829573509357553.

40.

van der Ploeg

Kretschmer

Salmivalli

Veenstra

(2017) Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers? Journal of School Psychology 65: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002.

41.

Verkuyten

Kinket

Van der Wielen

(1997) Preadolescents’ understanding of ethnic discrimination. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development 158: 97–112. doi:10.1080/00221329709596655.

42.

Vezzali, L., Birtel, M., Di Bernado, A., Stathi, S., Crisp, R. J., Cadamuro, A., & Vistinin, E. P. (2019). Don’t hurt my outgroup friend: A multifaceted form of imagined contact promotes intentions to counteract bullying. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430219852404.

43.

Yun

H. Y.

Graham

S. J.

(2018) Defending victims of bullying in early adolescence: A multilevel analysis. Youth Adolescence 47: 1926–1937. doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7.

44.

Zych

Baldry

A. C.

Farrington

D. P.

Llorent

V. J.

(2018) Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles. Aggression and Violent Behavior 45: 83–97. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.004.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB