A large body of literature shows that boys and girls experience different kinds of peer aggression. This difference is usually explained by the function of bullying depending on gender and age. In the present study, we used a mixed method called concept mapping to analyze the content structure of verbal aggression. We compared this structure between two levels of Polish schools—middle school and high school. Using experimental manipulation we tested whether the content of verbal invectives depends on the gender of the victim. Results showed six different types of verbal invectives. Middle school students listed substantially more in four out of the six categories. There were significant effects of the experimental manipulation of the victim's gender. When the male victim was primed there were significantly more sexual insults and when the female victim was primed there was substantially more ability-related verbal bullying. We interpret these results in the context of the development and norms of masculinity and femininity.
AldenderferM. S.BlashfieldR. K. (1984) Cluster analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
AnalitisF.VeldermanM. K.Ravens-SiebererU.DetmarS.ErhartM.HerdmanM.RajmilL. (2009) Being bullied: Associated factors in children and adolescents 8 to 18 years old in 11 European countries. Pediatrics123(2): 569–577. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0323.
3.
AoyamaI.SaxonT. F.FearonD. D. (2011) Internalizing problems among cyberbullying victims and moderator effects of friendship quality. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal5(2): 92–105. doi:10.1108/17504971111142637.
4.
ArcherJ. (2004) Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology8(4): 291–322. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291.
5.
Attar-SchwartzS.Khoury-KassabriM. (2008) Indirect versus verbal forms of victimization at school: The contribution of student, family, and school variables. Social Work Research32(3): 159–170. doi:10.1093/swr/32.3.159.
6.
BaldryA. C. (2004) The impact of direct and indirect bullying on the mental and physical health of Italian youngsters. Aggressive Behavior30(5): 343–355. doi:10.1002/ab.20043.
7.
BjörkqvistK. (1994) Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles30(3): 177–188. doi:10.1007/bf01420988.
8.
BjörkqvistK.LagerspetzK. M. J.KaukiainenA. (1992) Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior18(2): 117–127. doi:10.1002/1098-2337.
9.
BlickenstaffJ. (2005) Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?. Gender and Education17(4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072.
10.
BradshawJ.CrousG.ReesG.TurnerN. (2017) Comparing children's experiences of schools-based bullying across countries. Children and Youth Services Review80: 171–180. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.060.
11.
BronfenbrennerU. (1994) Ecological models of human development. Readings on the Development of Children2(1): 37–43.
12.
BudziszewskaM.HansenK. (2019) “Anger detracts from beauty”: Gender differences in adolescents' narratives about anger. Journal of Adolescent Research. . Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0743558419845870.
13.
BukowskiW. M.SippolaL. K.NewcombA. F. (2000) Variations in patterns of attraction to same- and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology36(2): 147–154. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.147.
14.
CalińskiT.HarabaszJ. (1974) A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics3(1): 1–27. doi:10.1080/03610927408827101.
15.
CardN. A.LittleT. D. (2006) Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development30(5): 466–480. doi:10.1177/0165025406071904.
16.
Cohen, J. (2001). Caring classrooms/intelligent schools: The social emotional education of young children. Series on Social Emotional Learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
17.
CoieJ. D.DodgeK. A.TerryR.WrightV. (1991) The role of aggression in peer relations: An analysis of aggression episodes in boys' play groups. Child Development62(4): 812–826. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01571.x.
18.
CraigW. M.PeplerD.ConnollyJ.HendersonK. (2001) Developmental context of peer harassment in early adolescence. In: JuvonenJ.GrahamS. (eds) Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized, New York, NY: The Guilford Press, pp. 242–261.
19.
CrickN. R.GrotpeterJ. K. (1995) Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development66(3): 710–722. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x.
20.
DweckC. S. (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist41(10): 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.
21.
EliassonM. A. (2007) Verbal abuse in school: Constructing gender and age in social interaction, Stockholm, Sweden: Institutionen för folkhälsovetenskap/Department of Public Health Sciences.
22.
EliassonM. A.IsakssonK.LaflammeL. (2007) Verbal abuse in school. Constructions of gender among 14- to 15-year-olds. Gender and Education19(5): 587–605. doi:10.1080/09540250701535600.
23.
FiskeS. T. (2009) From dehumanization and objectification to rehumanization. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1167(1): 31–34. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04544.x.
HeilbronN.PrinsteinM. J. (2008) A review and reconceptualization of social aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive correlates. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review11(4): 176–217. doi:10.1007/s10567-008-0037-9.
26.
HongJ. S.EspelageD. L. (2012) A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior17(4): 311–322. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003.
27.
HongJ. S.KralM. J.SterzingP. R. (2015) Pathways from bullying perpetration, victimization, and bully victimization to suicidality among school-aged youth: A review of the potential mediators and a call for further investigation. Trauma Violence Abuse16(4): 379–390. doi:10.1177/1524838014537904.
28.
HongJ. S.VoisinD. R.ChoS.SmithD. C.ReskoS. M. (2018) Peer victimization and substance use among African American adolescents and emerging adults on Chicago's Southside. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry88(4): 431–440. doi:10.1037/ort0000247.
29.
InfanteD. A.RiddleB. L.HorvathC. L.TumlinS. A. (1992) Verbal aggressiveness: Messages and reasons. Communication Quarterly40(2): 116–126. doi:10.1080/01463379209369827.
30.
JacksonK. M.TrochimW. M. K. (2002) Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods5(4): 307–336. doi:10.1177/109442802237114.
31.
KennedyE. (1995) Correlates of perceived popularity among peers: A study of race and gender differences among middle school students. The Journal of Negro Education64(2): 186–195. doi:10.2307/2967241.
32.
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Ladd, G. W. (2001).Variations in peer victimization: Relations to children's maladjustment. In Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 25–48). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
KruskalJ. B. (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika29(1): 1–27. doi:10.1007/bf02289565.
34.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. (2002) Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology38(5): 635–647. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635.
35.
MilliganG. W. (1980) An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika45(3): 325–342. doi:10.1007/bf02293907.
36.
NanselT. R.OverpeckM.PillaR. S.RuanW. J.Simons-MortonB.ScheidtP. (2001) Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA285(16): 2094–2100. doi:10.1001/jama.285.16.2094.
37.
Olweus, D. (2010). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 9–33). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
38.
PascoeC. J. (2011) Dude, you're a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
39.
PellegriniA. D. (2002) Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educational Psychologist37(3): 151–163. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3703_2.
40.
PellegriniA. D.LongJ. D. (2002) A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology20(2): 259–280. doi:10.1348/026151002166442.
41.
PreckelF.GoetzT.PekrunR.KleineM. (2008) Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: Comparing girls' and boys' achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly52(2): 146–159. doi:10.1177/0016986208315834.
42.
Przewłocka, J. (2015). Bezpieczeństwo uczniów i klimat społeczny w polskich szkołach: raport z badania [Student safety and social climate in Polish schools: Study report]. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
43.
ReijntjesA.KamphuisJ. H.PrinzieP.TelchM. J. (2010) Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect34(4): 244–252. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.009.
44.
RigbyK. (2003) Consequences of bullying in schools. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry48(9): 583–590. doi:10.1177/070674370304800904.
45.
Stefaniak, A., Bilewicz, M., & Winiewski, M. (Eds.). (2015). Uprzedzenia w Polsce [Prejudice in Poland]. Warszawa: Liberi Libri.
46.
Stefaniak, A., & Winiewski, M. (Eds.). (2018). Uprzedzenia w Polsce 2017: Oblicza przemocy kolektywnej [Prejudice in Poland 2017: Faces of intergroup violence.]. Warszawa: Liberi Libri.
47.
SteinleyD.BruscoM. J. (2007) Initializing K-means batch clustering: A critical evaluation of several techniques. Journal of Classification24(1): 99–121. doi:10.1007/s00357-007-0003-0.
48.
StoudtB. G. (2009) The role of language & discourse in the investigation of privilege: Using participatory action research to discuss theory, develop methodology, & interrupt power. The Urban Review41(1): 7–28. doi:10.1007/s11256-008-0093-y.
49.
SuC.HoltT. J. (2010) Cyber bullying in Chinese Web Forums: An examination of nature and extent. International Journal of Cyber Criminology4.
Tharp-TaylorS.HavilandA.D'AmicoE. J. (2009) Victimization from mental and physical bullying and substance use in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors34(6–7): 561–567. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.03.012.
52.
ThurlowC. (2001) Naming the “outsider within”: Homophobic pejoratives and the verbal abuse of lesbian, gay and bisexual high-school pupils. Journal of Adolescence24(1): 25–38. doi:10.1006/jado.2000.0371.
53.
TrochimW. M. (1989) An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning12(1): 1–16. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5.
54.
VissingY. M.StrausM. A.GellesR. J.HarropJ. W. (1991) Verbal aggression by parents and psychosocial problems of children. Child Abuse & Neglect15(3): 223–238. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(91)90067-N.
55.
Von MaréesN.PetermannF. (2010) Bullying in German primary schools: Gender differences, age trends and influence of parents' migration and educational backgrounds. School Psychology International31(2): 178–198. doi:10.1177/0143034309352416.
56.
WangJ.NanselT. R.IannottiR. J. (2011) Cyber and traditional bullying: Differential association with depression. Journal of Adolescent Health48(4): 415–417. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.012.
57.
WardJ. H. (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association58(301): 236–244. doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845.
58.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987) Doing gender. Gender & Society1(2): 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.
59.
WolkeD.CopelandW. E.AngoldA.CostelloE. J. (2013) Impact of bullying in childhood on adult health, wealth, crime, and social outcomes. Psychological Science24(10): 1958–1970. doi:10.1177/0956797613481608.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
