AppletonJ. J.ChristensenS. L.KimD.ReschlyA. L. (2006) Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology44: 427–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002.
2.
ArchambaultI.JanoszM.MorizotJ.PaganiL. (2009) Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health79(9): 408–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00428.x.
3.
BalfanzR.HerzogL.Mac IverD. J. (2007) Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist42(4): 223–235. doi: 10.1080/00461520701621079.
4.
CaiE. Y. L.LiemG. A. D. (2017) ‘Why do I study and what do I want to achieve by studying?’ Understanding the reasons and the aims of student engagement. School Psychology International38(2): 131–148.
5.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer.
6.
EcclesJ. S. (2004) Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In: LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (eds) Handbook of adolescent psychology, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 125–153.
7.
FinnJ. D. (1989) Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research59: 117–142.
8.
FinnJ. D.FishR. M.ScottL. A. (2008) Educational sequelae of high school misbehavior. The Journal of Educational Research101(5): 259–274. doi: 10.3200/JOER.101.5.259-274.
9.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004) School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research74(1): 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059.
10.
GreenJ.MartinA. J.MarshH. W. (2007) Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences17: 269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.003.
11.
HirschiT. (1969) The causes of delinquency, Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
12.
JangH.KimE. J.ReeveJ. (2016) Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory of dual-process model. Learning and Instruction43: 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.
13.
LeeJ.ShuteV. J. (2010) Personal and social-contextual factors in K–12 academic performance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychologist45(3): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.493471.
14.
LiemG. A. D.MartinA. J. (2012) The Motivation and Engagement Scale: Theoretical framework, psychometric properties, and applied yields. Australian Psychologist47(1): 3–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00049.x.
15.
LucioR.HuntE.BornovalovaM. (2012) Identifying the necessary and sufficient number of risk factors for predicting academic failure. Developmental Psychology48: 422–428. doi: 10.1037/a0025939.
16.
MartinT. G.MartinA. J.EvansP. (2017) Student engagement in the Caribbean region: Exploring its role in the motivation and achievement of Jamaican middle school students. School Psychology International38(2): 184–200.
17.
PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.AllenJ. P. (2012) Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In: ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 365–386.
18.
RafteryJ. N.GrolnickW. S.FlammE. S. (2012) Families as facilitators of student engagement: Toward a home-school partnership model. In: ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 343–364.
19.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017) Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness, New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
20.
SegallM. H.LonnerW. J.BerryJ. W. (1998) Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. American Psychologist53: 1101–1110. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.10.1101.
21.
ShernoffD. J.CsikszentmihalyiM.SchneiderB.ShernoffE. S. (2003) Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly18: 158–176. doi: 10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860.
22.
ShernoffD. J.RuzekE. A.SinhaS. (2017) The influence of the high school classroom environment on learning as mediated by student engagement. School Psychology International38(2): 201–218.
23.
SkinnerE. A.PitzerJ. R. (2012) Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping and everyday resilience. In: ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 21–44.
24.
WangM. T.DegolJ. (2014) Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives8(3): 137–143. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12073.
25.
WangM. T.HolcombeR. (2010) Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal47: 633–662. doi: 10.3102/0002831209361209.
26.
WangM. T.WillettJ. B.EcclesJ. S. (2011) The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology49: 465–480. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001.
27.
WattH. M. G.CarmichaelC.CallinghamR. (2017) Students’ engagement profiles in mathematics according to learning environment dimensions: Developing an evidence base for best practice in mathematics education. School Psychology International38(2): 166–183.
28.
ZhouM.RenJ. (2017) A self-determination perspective on Chinese fifth-graders’ task disengagement. School Psychology International38(2): 149–165.