Previous studies have demonstrated that several contextual factors influence the relationship between aggression and peer victimization in early adolescence, including gender of the same-sex peer group and gender composition of the school. The current study replicated and expanded on this research by examining the moderating influences of gender of the same-sex peer group, same-sex peer group norms, and classroom gender composition in a sample of early adolescents from Barranquilla, Colombia. Multilevel modeling analyses indicated that both relational and physical aggression were positive predictors of peer victimization. Relationally aggressive girls were at a lower risk for victimization while physically aggressive girls were at a higher risk. Relational aggression was a weaker predictor in classes with a larger proportion of girls. Additionally, relational aggression was a weaker predictor in same-sex peer groups with a greater prevalence of relational aggression. These findings provide further evidence of multiple forms of contextual influence on social behavior. Practical implications for these findings are also provided.
AdamsR. E.BartlettN. H.BukowskiW. M. (2010) Peer victimization and social dominance as intervening variables of the link between peer liking and relational aggression. The Journal of Early Adolescence30: 102–121. doi:10.1177/0272431609342985.
2.
ArcherJ. (2004) Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology8: 291–322. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291.
3.
BerkowitzA. D. (2003) Applications of social norms theory to other health and social justice issues. In: PerkinsH. W. (ed.) The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BilskyS. A.ColeD. A.DukewichT. L.MartinN. C.SinclairK. R.TranC. V. (2013) Does supportive parenting mitigate the longitudinal effects of peer victimization on depressive thoughts and symptoms in children?Journal of Abnormal Psychology122: 206–249. doi: 10.1037/a0032501.
5.
BjörkqvistK.LagerspetzK. M. J.KaukiainenA. (1992) Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior18: 117–127.
6.
BlockJ. (1983) Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures. Child Development54: 1335–1354. doi: 10.2307/1129799.
7.
BoivinM.DodgeK. A.CoieJ. D. (1995) Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: The social misfit revised. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology69: 269–279. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.269.
8.
BronfenbrennerU. (1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist32(7): 513–531. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513.
9.
BronfenbrennerU. (1986) Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology22: 723–742. doi: 0012-1649/86/$00.75.
10.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis.
11.
CardN. A.HodgesE. V. E. (2008) Peer victimization among schoolchildren: Correlations, causes, consequences, and considerations in assessment and intervention. School Psychology Quarterly23: 451–461. doi: 10.1037/a0012769.
12.
CardN.StuckyB.SawalaniG.LittleT. (2008) Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development79: 1185–1229. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27563548.
13.
ChangL. (2004) The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology40: 691–702. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691.
14.
ChenX.FrenchD. C.SchneiderB. H. (2006) Peer relationships in cultural context, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991) A focus theory of normative conduct. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology24: 201–234.
16.
CrickN. R.GrotpeterJ. K. (1995) Relational aggression, sex, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development66: 710–722. doi:1. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1131945 doi:1.
17.
DelveauxK. D.DanielsT. (2000) Children’s social cognitions: Physically and relationally aggressive strategies and children’s goals in peer conflict situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly46: 672–691. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23092570.
18.
DillE. J.VernbergE. M.FonagyP.TwemlowS. W.GammB. K. (2004) Negative affect in victimized children: The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and attitudes towards bullying. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology32: 159–173. doi: 0091-0627/04/0400-0159/0.
19.
GrahamS.JuvonenJ. (1998) Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology34: 587–599. doi:0012-1649/98/53.00.
20.
HarrisJ. (1995) Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review102: 458–489.
21.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010) The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences33: 61–135. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
22.
HenryD.GuerraN.HuesmannR.TolanP.VanAckerR.EronL. (2000) Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology28: 59–81.
23.
HindeR. A. (1987) Social relationships and their developmental significance. American Psychologist44: 120–126.
24.
HodgesE.BoivinM.VitaroF.BukowskiW. M. (1999) The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology35: 94–101.
25.
KlineR. B. (2013) Cognitive distortions in significance testing. In Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 95–120.
26.
KuppensS.GrietensH.OmghenaP.MichielsD.SubramanianS. V. (2008) Individuals and classroom variables associated with relational aggression in elementary-school aged children: A multilevel analysis. Journal of School Psychology46: 639–660. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.005.
27.
LansfordJ. E.SkinnerA. T.SorbringE.Di GuintaL.Deater-DeckardK.DodgeK. A. (2012) Boys and girls relational and physical aggression in nine countries. Aggressive Behavior38: 298–308. doi:10.1002/ab.21433.
28.
MaccobyE. E. (1998) The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
MastenA. S.MorisonP.PellegriniD. S. (1985) A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology21: 523–533. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.3.523.
30.
McLaughlinK. A.HatzenbuehlerM. L.HiltL. M. (2009) Emotion dysregulation as a mechanism linking peer victimization to internalizing symptoms in adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology77(5): 894–904. doi: 10.1037/a0015760.
31.
MillerD. T.PrenticeD. A. (1994) Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20: 541–550.
32.
NipedalC.NesdaleD.KillenM. (2010) Social group norms, school norms, and children’s aggressive intentions. Aggressive Behavior36(3): 195–204. doi: 10.1002/ab.20342.
33.
OstrovJ. M. (2010) Prospective associations between peer victimization and aggression. Child Development81: 1670–1677. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01501.x.
34.
OstrovJ. M.CrickN. R. (2007) Forms and functions of aggression during early childhood: A short-term longitudinal study. School Psychology Review36: 22–43.
35.
OstrovJ. M.GodleskiS. A. (2013) Relational aggression, victimization, and adjustment during middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology25: 801–815. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000187.
36.
PutallazM.GrimesC. L.FosterK. J.KupersmidtJ. B.CoieJ. D.DearingK. (2007) Overt and relational aggression and victimization: Multiple perspectives within the school setting. Journal of School Psychology45: 523–547. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.003.
37.
RuegerS. Y.JenkinsL. N. (2013) Effects of peer victimization on psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly. Advance online publication. 1–12. doi: 10.1037/spq0000036.
38.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW.ParkerJ. G. (2006) Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), and N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development. New York, NY: Wiley.
39.
ShawM. (1981) Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior, 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
40.
SullivanT. N.FarrellA. D.KliewerW. (2006) Peer victimization in early adolescence: Association between physical and relational victimization and drug use, aggression, and delinquent behaviors among urban middle school students. Development and Psychopathology18: 119–137. doi:10.10170S095457940606007X.
41.
ThomasD. E.BiermanK. L.The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (2006) The impact of classroom aggressive behavior problems in children. Development and Psychopathology18: 471–487. doi: 10.10170S0954579406060251.
42.
TomS. R.SchwartzD.ChangL.FarverJ. A. M.XuY. (2010) Correlates of victimization in Hong Kong children’s peer groups. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology31: 27–37.
43.
TomadaG.SchneiderB. H. (1997) Relational aggression, gender, and peer acceptance: Invariance across culture, stability over time, and concordance among informants. Developmental Psychology33: 601–609.
44.
UnderwoodM. (2007) Gender and children’s friendships: Do girls’ and boys’ friendships constitute different peer cultures, and what are the trade-offs for development?Merrill-Palmer Quarterly53: 319–324.
45.
VelasquezA. M.BukowskiW. M.SaldarriagaL. M. (2012) Adjusting for group size effects in peer nomination data. Social Development56: 283–302.
46.
VelasquezA. M.SantoJ. B.SaldarriagaL. M.LopezL. S.BukowskiW. M. (2010) Context-dependent victimization and aggression differences between all-girl and mixed-sex schools. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly56: 283–302. doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0054.
47.
WrightJ. C.GiammarinoM.ParadH. W. (1986) Social status in small groups: Individual-group similarity and the social misfit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50: 523–536.
