This study examined the moderating effect of Machiavellianism on the relationships between bullying, peer acceptance, and school adjustment (rule-following behavior and academic performance) among 216 middle school 7th-graders in Taipei, Taiwan. The participants were divided into two groups according to their Machiavellianism. Multi-group path analysis showed that for those who were low in Machiavellianism condition, physical and verbal bullying was negatively linked to peer acceptance and academic performance while no significant association was found for the high-Machiavellianism group. Bullying was negatively, yet non-significantly, associated with rule-following behavior for both groups. The results largely supported the buffering effect of Machiavellianism on the negative outcomes of bullying. Implications for school-violence prevention and for research on adaptive bullies are discussed.
AndreouE. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relationsto overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27(3), 339–351, doi: 10.1177/0143034306067286.
2.
AndreouE.BonotiF. (2010). Children’s bullying experiences expressed through drawings and self-reports. School Psychology International, 31(2), 164–177, doi: 10.1177/0143034309352421.
3.
AndreouE.MetallidouP. (2004). The relationship of academic and social cognition to behaviour in bullying situations among Greek primary school children. Educational Psychology, 24(1), 27–41, doi: 10.1080/0144341032000146421.
4.
AndreouE.VlachouA.DidaskalouE. (2005). The roles of self-efficacy, peer interactions and attitudes in bully-victim incidents: Implications for intervention policy-practices. School Psychology International, 26(5), 545–562, doi: 10.1177/0143034305060789.
5.
BarlowA.QualterP.StylianouM. (2010). Relationships between Machiavellianism, emotional intelligence and theory of mind in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(1), 78–82, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.021.
6.
BarnowS.LuchtM.FreybergerH. (2005). Correlates of aggressive and delinquent conduct problems in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 31(1), 24–39, doi: 10.1002/ab.20033.
7.
BaumanS.Del RioA. (2005). Knowledge and beliefs about bullying in schools: Comparing pre-service teachers in the United States and the United Kingdom. School Psychology International, 26(4), 428–442, doi: 10.1177/0143034305059019.
8.
BenbenishtyR.AstorR.MarachiR.FurlongM.JimersonS. (2006). A national study of school violence in Israel: Implications for theory, practice, and policy. Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice (pp. 481–497). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
9.
BesagV. E. (2006). Bullying among girls: Friends or foes?. School Psychology International, 27(5), 535–551, doi: 10.1177/0143034306073401.
10.
BjörkqvistK. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30(3/4), 177–188, doi: 10.1007/BF01420988.
11.
BlackS. A.JacksonE. (2007). Using bullying incident density to evaluate the Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme. School Psychology International, 28(5), 623–638, doi: 10.1177/0143034307085662.
12.
BoultonM. J.SmithP. K.CowieH. (2010). Short-term longitudinal relationships between children’s peer victimization/bullying experiences and self-perceptions: Evidence for reciprocity. School Psychology International, 31(3), 296–311, doi: 10.1177/0143034310362329.
13.
CaravitaS.Di BlasioP.SalmivalliC. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140–163, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x.
14.
CardN. A.HodgesE. (2007). Victimization within mutually antipathetic peer relationships. Social Development, 16(3), 479–496, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00394.x.
15.
CardN.LittleT. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(5), 466–480, doi: 10.1177/0165025406071904.
16.
CarlsonI.CornellD. (2008). Differences between persistent and desistent middle school bullies. School Psychology International, 29(4), 442–451, doi: 10.1177/0143034308096433.
17.
CassidyW.JacksonM.BrownK. N. (2009). Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students’ experiences with cyber-bullying. School Psychology International, 30(4), 383–402, doi: 10.1177/0143034309106948.
18.
CerezoF.AtoM. (2005). Bullying in Spanish and English pupils: A sociometric perspective using the BULL-S questionnaire. Educational Psychology, 25(4), 353–367, doi: 10.1080/01443410500041458.
19.
ChanJ. F. (2006). Systemic patterns in bullying and victimization. School Psychology International, 27(3), 352–369, doi: 10.1177/0143034306067289.
20.
ChristieR.GeisF. L.. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York, NY: Academic Press.
21.
CourtneyM.CohenR.DeptulaD.KitzmannK. (2003). An experimental analysis ofchildren’s dislike of aggressors and victims. Social Development, 12(1), 46–66, doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00221.
22.
CraigW.PeplerD.BlaisJ. (2007). Responding to bullying: What works. School Psychology International, 28(4), 465–477, doi: 10.1177/0143034307084136.
23.
CrickN. R.DodgeK. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993–1002, doi: 10.2307/1131875.
24.
CrickN.NelsonD. (2002). Relational and physical victimization within friendships: Nobody told me there’d be friends like these. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(6), 599–607, doi: 10.1023/A:1020811714064.
25.
CrothersL. M.KolbertJ. B.BarkerW. F. (2006). Middle school students’ preferences for anti-bullying interventions. School Psychology International, 27(4), 475–487, doi: 10.1177/0143034306070435.
26.
DueP.HolsteinB. (2008). Bullying victimization among 13 to 15 year old school children: Results from two comparative studies in 66 countries and regions. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 20(2), 209–221.
27.
EliotM.CornellD. G. (2009). Bullying in middle school as a function of insecure attachment and aggressive attitudes. School Psychology International, 30(2), 201–214, doi: 10.1177/0143034309104148.
28.
EspelageD.HoltM. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2), 123–142, doi: 10.1300/J135v02n02_08.
29.
FarisR.FelmleeD. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 48–73, doi: 10.1177/0003122410396196.
30.
FarrellP. (2010). School psychology: Learning lessons from history and moving forward. School Psychology International, 31(6), 581–598, doi: 10.1177/0143034310386533.
31.
FarrellP.JimersonS.KalamboukaA.BenoitJ. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of school psychologists in different countries. School Psychology International, 26(5), 525–544, doi: 10.1177/0143034305060787.
32.
GasserL.KellerM. (2009). Are the competent the morally good? Perspective taking and moral motivation of children involved in bullying. Social Development, 18(4), 798–816, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00516.x.
33.
GeorgiouS. N.StavrinidesP. (2008). Bullies, victims and bully-victims: Psychosocial profiles and attribution styles. School Psychology International, 29(5), 574–589, doi: 10.1177/0143034308099202.
34.
GestS.Graham-BermannS.HartupW. (2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10(1), 23–40, doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00146.
35.
GiniG. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong?. Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 528–539, doi: 10.1002/ab.20153.
36.
GrahamS.BellmoreA.MizeJ. (2006). Peer victimization, aggression, and their co-occurrence in middle school: Pathways to adjustment problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(3), 363–378, doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9030-2.
37.
HampelP.ManhalS.HayerT. (2009). Direct and relational bullying among children and adolescents: Coping and psychological adjustment. School Psychology International, 30(5), 474–490, doi: 10.1177/0143034309107066.
38.
HawleyP. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 279–309, doi: 10.1353/mpq.2003.0013.
39.
HawleyP.HawleyP. (2007). Social dominance in childhood and adolescence: Why social competence and aggression may go hand in hand. Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 1–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
40.
HeilbronN.PrinsteinM. (2008). A review and reconceptualization of social aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive correlates. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(4), 176–217, doi: 10.1007/s10567-008-0037-9.
41.
HolsenI.SmithB. H.FreyK. S. (2008). Outcomes of the social competence program Second Step in Norwegian elementary schools. School Psychology International, 29(1), 71–88, doi: 10.1177/0143034307088504.
42.
HungL.. (2000). Manual of the Adolescent Social Behavior Scale. Taipei: Psychological Publishing Company.
43.
JamesV. H.OwensL. D. (2005). ‘They turned around like I wasn’t there’: An analysis of teenage girls’ letters about their peer conflicts. School Psychology International, 26(1), 71–88, doi: 10.1177/0143034305050895.
44.
JantzerA. M.HooverJ. H.NarlochR. (2006). The relationship between school-aged bullying and trust, shyness and quality of friendships in young adulthood: A preliminary research note. School Psychology International, 27(2), 146–156, doi: 10.1177/0143034306064546.
45.
JonasonP. K.LiN. P.TeicherE. A. (2010). Who is James Bond? The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8(2), 111–120.
46.
JungW.StinnettT. A. (2005). Comparing judgements of social, behavioural, emotional and school adjustment functioning for Korean, Korean American and Caucasian American children. School Psychology International, 26(3), 317–329, doi: 10.1177/0143034305055976.
47.
KempesM.MatthysW.de VriesH.van EngelandH. (2005). Reactive and proactive aggression in children: A review of theory, findings and the relevance for child and adolescent psychiatry. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 14(1), 11–19, doi: 10.1007/s00787-005-0432-4.
48.
KimS.KamphausR.OrpinasP.KelderS. (2010). Change in the manifestation of overt aggression during early adolescence: Gender and ethnicity. School Psychology International, 31(1), 95–111, doi: 10.1177/0143034309352579.
49.
KokkinosC. M.PanayiotouG. (2004). Predicting bullying and victimization among early adolescents: Associations with disruptive behavior disorders. Aggressive Behavior, 30(6), 520–533, doi: 10.1002/ab.20055.
50.
KokkoK.TremblayR.LacourseE.VitaroF.NaginD. (2006). Trajectories of prosocial behavior and physical aggression in middle childhood: Links to adolescent school dropout and physical violence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(3), 403–428, doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00500.x.
51.
KooH.KwakK.SmithP. (2008). Victimization in Korean schools: The nature, incidence, and distinctive features of Korean bullying or wang-ta. Journal of School Violence, 7(4), 119–139, doi: 10.1080/15388220801974084.
52.
KumpulainenK.RäsänenE. (2000). Children involved in bullying at elementary school age: Their psychiatric symptoms and deviance in adolescence. An epidemiological sample. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(12), 1567–1577, doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00210-6.
53.
LarochetteA.MurphyA.CraigW. M. (2010). Racial bullying and victimization in Canadian school-aged children: Individual and school level effects. School Psychology International, 31(4), 389–408, doi: 10.1177/0143034310377150.
54.
LiY.WangM.WangC.ShiJ. (2010). Individualism, collectivism, and Chinese adolescents’ aggression: Intracultural variations. Aggressive Behavior, 36(3), 187–194, doi: 10.1002/ab.20341.
55.
LounsburyJ.SundstromE.LovelandJ.GibsonL. (2002). Broad versus narrow personality traits in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(1), 65–75, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2003.08.001.
56.
LovelandJ.LounsburyJ.WelshD.BuboltzW. (2007). The validity of physical aggression in predicting adolescent academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 167–176, doi: 10.1348/000709905X79563.
57.
MaL.PhelpsE.LernerJ. V.LernerR. M. (2009). The development of academic competence among adolescents who bully and who are bullied. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 628–644, doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2009.07.006.
58.
MerrellK.GueldnerB.RossS.IsavaD. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 26–42, doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.26.
59.
MintonS. J.O’ MooreA. M. (2008). The effectiveness of a nationwide intervention programme to prevent and counter school bullying in Ireland. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8(1), 1–12.
60.
MishnaF.WienerJ.PeplerD. (2008). Some of my best friends—Experiences of bullying within friendships. School Psychology International, 29(5), 549–573, doi: 10.1177/0143034308099201.
61.
Murray-HarveyR.SleeP. T. (2010). School and home relationships and their impact on school bullying. School Psychology International, 31(3), 271–295, doi: 10.1177/0143034310366206.
62.
NanselT.HaynieD.Simons-MortonB. (2003). The association of bullying and victimization with middle school adjustment. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 45–61, doi: 10.1300/J008v19n02_04.
63.
NordgrenL. F.BanasK.MacDonaldG. (2011). Empathy gaps for social pain: Why people underestimate the pain of social suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 120–128, doi: 10.1037/a0020938.
64.
OhI.HazlerR. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30(3), 291–310, doi: 10.1177/0143034309106499.
65.
PeetersM.CillessenA. N.ScholteR. J. (2010). Clueless or powerful? Identifying subtypes of bullies in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(9), 1041–1052, doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9478-9.
66.
Popović-ĆitiB.DjurićS.CvetkovićV. (2011). The prevalence of cyberbullying among adolescents: A case study of middle schools in Serbia. School Psychology International, 32(3), 1–13, doi: 10.1177/0143034311401700.
67.
RichardJ. F.SchneiderB. H.MalletP. (2011). Revisiting the whole-school approach to bullying: Really looking at the whole school. School Psychology International.
68.
RigbyK. (2005). Why do some children bully at school? The contributions of negative attitudes towards victims and the perceived expectations of friends, parents and teachers. School Psychology International, 26(2), 147–161, doi: 10.1177/0143034305052910.
69.
RigbyK.GriffithsC. (2011). Addressing cases of bullying through the Method of Shared Concern. School Psychology International, 32(3), 345–357, doi: 10.1177/0143034311402148.
70.
Rios-EllisB.BellamyL.ShojiJ. (2000). An examination of specific types of Ijime within Japanese schools. School Psychology International, 21(3), 227–241, doi: 10.1177/0143034300213001.
71.
RodkinP.FarmerT.PearlR.Van AckerR. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 14–24, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.14.
72.
RoseA.SwensonL.CarlsonW. (2004). Friendships of aggressive youth: Considering the influences of being disliked and of being perceived as popular. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88(1), 25–45, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.02.005.
73.
SalmivalliC.KaukiainenA.LagerspetzK. (2000). Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter?. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41(1), 17–24, doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00166.
74.
SchaefferC.PetrasH.IalongoN.KellamS.PoduskaJ. (2003). Modeling growth in boys’ aggressive behavior across elementary school: Links to later criminal involvement, conduct disorder, and antisocial personality disorder. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 1020–1035, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1020.
75.
SchwartzD.GormanA.NakamotoJ.McKayT. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116–1127, doi: 10.1037/0012–1649.42.6.1116.
76.
SentseM.ScholteR.SalmivalliC.VoetenM. (2007). Person-group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(6), 1009–1019, doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9150-3.
77.
ShinH. (2010). Does depression moderate or mediate the relations between deficits in competence and aggression? A short-term longitudinal study of Korean children. School Psychology International, 31(4), 331–352, doi: 10.1177/0143034310377139.
78.
ShinY. (2010). Psychosocial and friendship characteristics of bully/victim subgroups in Korean primary school children. School Psychology International, 31(4), 372–388, doi: 10.1177/0143034310377296.
79.
SijtsemaJ.VeenstraR.LindenbergS.SalmivalliC. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 57–67, doi: 10.1002/ab.20282.
80.
SlaughterV.BarryC. T.KerigP. K.StellwagenK. K.BarryT. D. (2011). Early adoption of Machiavellian attitudes: Implications for children’s interpersonal relationships. Narcissism and Machiavellianism in youth: Implications for the development of adaptive and maladaptive behavior (pp. 177–192). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
81.
SmithP. K.MonksC. P.CoyneI. (2011). Bullying in schools: Thirty years of research. Bullying in different contexts (pp. 36–60). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
82.
SmokowskiP.FraserM.DayS.BacallaoM.GalinskyM. (2004). School-based skills training to prevent aggressive behavior and peer rejection in childhood: Evaluating the making choices program. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25(2), 233–251, doi: 10.1023/B:JOPP.0000042392.57611.05.
83.
SongS.StoiberK. (2008). Children exposed to violence at school: An evidence-based intervention agenda for the ‘real’ bullying problem. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 8(1/2), 235–253, doi: 10.1080/10926790801986205.
84.
SpriggsA.IannottiR.NanselT.HaynieD. (2007). Adolescent bullying involvement and perceived family, peer and school relations: Commonalities and differences across race/ethnicity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(3), 283–293, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.009.
85.
StormshakE.BiermanK.BruschiC.DodgeK.CoieJ. (1999). The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Child Development, 70(1), 169–182, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00013.
86.
SuttonJ. (2001). Bullies: Thugs or thinkers?. The Psychologist, 14(10), 530–534.
87.
SuttonJ.KeoghE. (2000). Social competition in school: Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(3), 443–456, doi: 10.1348/000709900158227.
88.
SuttonJ.SmithP. K.SwettenhamJ. (1999). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation?. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 435–450, doi: 10.1348/026151099165384.
89.
SwaimR.HenryK.KellyK. (2006). Predictors of aggressive behaviors among rural middle school youth. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27(3), 229–243, doi: 10.1007/s10935-006-0031-2.
90.
ToblinR.SchwartzD.GormanA.Abou-ezzeddineT. (2005). Social-cognitive and behavioral attributes of aggressive victims of bullying. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 329–346, doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2005.02.004.
91.
VaillancourtT.HymelS. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 396–408, doi: 10.1002/ab.20138.
92.
VazsonyiA.KeileyM. (2007). Normative developmental trajectories of aggressive behaviors in African American, American Indian, Asian American, Caucasian, and Hispanic children and early adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(6), 1047–1062, doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9154-z.
93.
VeenstraR.LindenbergS.MunniksmaA.DijkstraJ. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81, 510–516, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01411.x.
94.
VeenstraR.LindenbergS.OldehinkelA.VerhulstF.OrmelJ.De WinterA. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 672–682, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.672.
95.
VidingE.SimmondsE.PetridesK. V.FredericksonN. (2009). The contribution of callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems to bullying in early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(4), 471–481, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02012.x.
96.
Von MaréesN.PetermannF. (2010). Bullying in German primary schools: Gender differences, age trends and influence of parents’ migration and educational backgrounds. School Psychology International, 31(2), 178–198, doi: 10.1177/0143034309352416.
97.
WardenD.MackinnonS. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 367–385, doi: 10.1348/026151003322277757.
98.
WeiH. S.Jonson-ReidM. (2011). Friends can hurt you: Examining the coexistence of friendship and bullying among early adolescents. School Psychology International, 32(3), 244–262, doi: 10.1177/0143034311402310.
99.
WeiH.Jonson-ReidM.TsaoH. (2007). Bullying and victimization among Taiwanese 7th graders: A multi-method assessment. School Psychology International, 28(4), 479–500, doi: 10.1177/0143034307084137.
100.
WnekA. C.KleinG.BrackenB. A. (2008). Professional development issues for school psychologists: What’s hot, what’s not in the United States. School Psychology International, 29(2), 145–160, doi: 10.1177/0143034308090057.
101.
WolkeD.WoodsS.BloomfieldL.KarstadtL. (2000). The association between direct and relational bullying and behaviour problems among primary school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(8), 989–1002, doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00687.
102.
YilmazH. (2011). Cyberbullying in Turkish middle schools: An exploratory study. School Psychology International, 32(6).
