Age, gender, and cross-national differences of children ages 9 through 16 in Pakistan (n = 463) and the United States (n = 500) are examined on four bipolar temperament styles: Extroversion-introversion, practical-imaginative, thinking-feeling, and organized-flexible. In general, Pakistani children prefer extroverted over introverted, practical over imaginative, and organized over flexible styles. Although their preference for thinking and feeling styles is balanced, gender differences are significant. Males generally prefer a thinking style and females generally prefer a feeling style. Gender and age differences are found on practical-imaginative and organized-flexible styles. Cross-national differences are found on practical-imaginative and organized-flexible styles. In contrast to children in the US, children in Pakistan are more likely to prefer practical and organized styles.
AchenbachT MRescorlaL A (2007) Multicultural understanding of child and adolescent psychopathology: Implications for mental health assessment. New York, NY: Oxford.
2.
BassettK (2005). Nature, nurture, and temperament: Comparisons of temperament Styles displayed by US students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida. Dissertation Abstracts International, 122(101/A), 8993–8993.
3.
BassettKOaklandT (2009). Temperament preferences for children ages 8 through 17 in a nationally represented sample. In KaufmanJ C (Ed.), Intelligent testing: Integrating psychological theory and clinical practice (pp. 30–52). Boston, MACambridge University Press.
4.
BatesJ EWachsT D (Eds.) (1994). Temperament: Individual differences of the interface of biology and behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
BensonNOaklandTShermisN (2009). Cross-national invariance of children's temperament. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(1), 3–16.
6.
BerryJ WPoortingaY HSegallM HDasenP R (1992) Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ByrneB MOaklandTLeongF T Lvan de VijverF J RHambletonR KCheungF MBartramD (2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(2), 94–105.
9.
CalluengC.de Carvalho FilhoM. K.IsobeM.OaklandT. (under review). Temperament styles of children from Japan and the United States.
10.
GoldsmithH HBussA HPlominRRothbartM KThomasAChessSHindeR AMcCallR B (1987). Roundtable: What is temperament? Four approaches. Child Development, 58(2), 505–529.
11.
HallC SLindzeyG (1978). Theories of personality, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
HallJ EAltmaierE (Eds.) (2008). Global promise: Quality assurance and accountability in professional psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
HofstedeG (1980) Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
HortonCOaklandT (1997) Student Styles Questionnaire classroom application booklet. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
15.
JoyceD (2010) Essentials of temperament assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.
16.
JoyceDOaklandT (2005). Temperament differences among children with conduct disorder and oppositional defiant disorder. The California School Psychologist, 10, 125–136.
17.
JungC.G. (1946). Psychological types (Trans. BaynesH.G.). New York, NY: Harcourt. (Original work published 1921).
18.
KaganJ (1994) Galen's prophecy: Temperament in human nature. New York, NY: Basic Books.
19.
KatonaNOaklandT (2000). The development of temperament in Hungarian children. Hungarian Journal of Psychology, 1, 17–29.
20.
KeirseyDBatesM (1984). Please understand me, 3rd ed. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Book Company.
21.
KeoghB K (2003) Temperament in the classroom. New York, NY: Paul Brooks Publishing Co.
22.
LawrenceG (1982). People types and tiger stripes: A practical guide to learning styles, 2nd ed. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
23.
LeonCOaklandTWeiYBerriosM (2009). Venezuelan children's temperament styles and comparison with their United States peers. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 43, 407–415.
24.
MacdaidGMcCaulleyMKainzR (1991) Atlas of type tables. Gainesville, FL: Center for the Application of Psychological Types.
25.
McCraeR RCosta JrP T (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516.
26.
MyersI BMcCaulleyM H (1985) Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
27.
OaklandTAlghoraniM ALeeD H (2006). Temperament-based learning styles of Palestinian and US children. School Psychology International, 28, 110–128.
28.
OaklandTBannerDLivingstonR (2000). Temperament-based learning styles of visually impaired children. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 94(1), 26–33.
29.
OaklandTFaulknerMBassettK (2005). Temperament styles of children from Australia and the United States. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 19, 35–51.
30.
OaklandTGluttingJHortonC (1996) Student Styles Questionnaire. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
31.
OaklandTHatzichristouS (2010). Temperament styles of children from Greece and the United States. School Psychology International, 31(4), 422–437.
32.
OaklandTIlliescuDDincaMDempseyA (2009). Temperament styles of Romanian children. Psihologia Sociala, 22(2), 70–84.
33.
OaklandTLeeD H (2010). Temperament styles of children from South Korea and the United States. School Psychology International, 31(1), 77–94.
34.
OaklandTLuL (2006). Temperament styles of children from the People's Republic of China and the United States. School Psychology International, 27, 192–208.
35.
OaklandTMataA (2007). Temperament styles of children from Costa Rica and the United States. Journal of Psychological Type, 67, 91–102.
36.
OaklandTMogajiADempseyJ (2006). Temperament Styles of Nigerian and US. Children. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 16, 27–34.
37.
OaklandTMpofuESulkowskiM (2007). Temperament styles of Zimbabwe and US. children. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 21, 139–153.
38.
OaklandTPretoriusJ (2009). Temperament styles of children from South Africa and the United States. School Psychology International, 29(5), 627–639.
39.
OaklandTStaffordMHortonCGluttingJ (2001). Temperament and vocational preferences: Age, gender, and racial-ethnic comparisons. Journal of Career Assessment, 9(3), 297–314.
40.
OaklandT.SinghK.CalluengC.GoenA. (2011). Temperament styles of Indian and US children. School Psychology International.
41.
PlominRDunnJ (1986) The study of temperament: Changes, continuities, and challenges. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
RothbartM KJonesL B (1998). Temperament, self-regulation, and education. School Psychology Review, 27(4), 479–491.
43.
StaffordMOaklandT (1996a). Validity of temperament constructs using the Student Styles Questionnaire: Comparisons for three racial-ethnic groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 109–120.
44.
StaffordMOaklandT (1996b). Racial-ethnic comparisons of temperament constructs for three age groups using the Student Styles Questionnaire. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 19(2), 100–110.
45.
StrelauJAngleitnerA (1994). Cross-cultural studies on temperament: Theoretical considerations and empirical studies based on the Pavlovian temperament survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(2), 331–342.
46.
TabachnickB GFidellL S (2006). Using multivariate statistics, 3rd ed. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
47.
TeglasiH (1998a). Introduction to the mini-series: Implications of temperament for the practice of school psychology. School Psychology Review, 27(4), 475–478.
48.
TeglasiH (1998b). Temperament constructs and measures. School Psychology Review, 27(4), 564–585.
49.
ThomasAChessS (1977) Temperament and development. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
50.
WeddingDStevensM (Eds.) (2004). The handbook of international psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
