Researchers, practitioners and theorists have raised concerns about the special education delivery and classification processes in the United States. The President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education report (PCESE: 2002) examined these concerns and existing special education research, reports and opinions to develop recommendations for the reauthorization of the Individuals with Disability Act. National Association of School Psychologists Position Statements and other publications support the basic findings of the PCESE report. If enacted as recommended, the proposals will fundamentally change special education classification and service delivery. The changes have the potential to alter in fundamental ways the prevailing school psychology practices in the US. This article: (a) outlines some of the concerns and research that lead to calls for radical special education reform; (b) identifies National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) Position Statements and PCESE findings that respond to identified special education issues and (c) presents information about school-based practices that will likely change if reform actually occurs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allington, R. , Stuetzel, H. , Shake, M. and Lamarche, S. (1986) ‘What is Remedial Reading? A Descriptive Study’ , Reading Research and Instruction26: 15-30 .
2.
Carnine, D. (1994) ‘Introduction to The Mini-Series: Diverse Learners and Prevailing, Emerging, and Research-Based Educational Approaches and Their Tools’ , School Psychology Review23: 341-350 .
3.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957) ‘The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology’ , American Psychologist12: 671-684 .
4.
Cronbach, L. J. (1975) ‘Beyond The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology’ , American Psychologist30: 116-127 .
5.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act (P.L. 94-142) (1975) 20 USC Sections 1401, et seq. (1982).
6.
Galloway, D. (1998) ‘Special Education in the United Kingdom: Educational Psychologists and the Effectiveness of Special Education’ , School Psychology Review27: 77-83 .
7.
Gottlieb, J. , Alter, M. , Gottlieb, B. W. and Wishner, J. (1994) ‘Special Education in Urban America: It’s Not Justifiable For Many’ , Journal of Special Education27: 453-465 .
8.
Graham, D. M. (1991) ‘Secondary Remedial Reading: What Instructional Goals Reveal’, Dissertation Abstracts International 52(11-A).
9.
Greenwood, C. R. , Carta, J. J. , Kamps, K. , Terry, B. and Delquandri, J. (1994) ‘Developmental and Validation of Standard Classroom Observation Systems for School Practitioners: Ecobehavioral Assessment Systems Software (EBASS)’ , Exceptional Children61: 197-210 .
10.
Gresham, F. M. , MacMillan, D. L. and Bocian, K. (1996) ‘Learning Disabilities, Low Achievement, and Mild Mental Retardation: More Alike Than Different?’ , Journal of Learning Disabilities29: 570-581 .
11.
Grossen, B. (1997) Thirty Years of Research: What We Now Know About How Children Learn to Read. Retrieved March 7, 2003, from http://www.daisy.ym.edu.tw/%7Ejrlee/30years.html
12.
Gutkin, T. B. and Conoley, J. C. (1990) ‘Reconceptualizing School Psychology From a Service Delivery Perspective: Implications for Practice, Training, and Research’ , Journal of School Psychology28: 203-223 .
13.
Hatzichristou, C. (2002) ‘A Conceptual Framework of the Evolution of School Psychology: Transnational Considerations of Common Phases and Future Perspectives’ , School Psychology International23: 266-282 .
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (P.L.105-17) 20 USC Chapter 33, Sections 1400 et seq.
15.
Kavale, K. A. (1990) ‘The Effectiveness of Special Education’, in T. B. Gutkin and C. R. Reynolds (eds) The Handbook of School Psychology, 2nd edn, pp. 868-898. New York: Wiley .
16.
Lynch, E. and Beare, P. L. (1990) ‘The Quality of IEP Objectives and Their Relevance to Instruction for Students With Mental Retardation and Behavioral Disorders’ , Remedial and Special Education11: 48-55 .
17.
MacMillan, D. L. and Reschly, D. J. (1998) ‘Overrepresentation of Minority Students: The Case For Greater Specificity or Reconsideration of the Variables Examined’ , The Journal of Special Education32: 15-24 .
18.
National Association of School Psychologists. (1986; 2002) Rights Without Labels. Retrieved March 7, 2003, from http://www.nasponline.org/information/position_paper.html
19.
National Association of School Psychologists. (1994) Position Statement on School Psychologists’ Involvement in the Role of Assessment. Retrieved March 7, 2003, from http://www.nasponline.org/information/position_paper.html
20.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2003) NASP Recommendations on LD Eligibility and Identification for IDEA Reauthorization. Retrieved August 3, 2004, from http://nasponline.org/advocacy/LDRecs_042803.pdf
21.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2002) Position Statement on Three-Year Reevaluations for Students with Disabilities. Retrieved March 7, 2003, from http://www.nasponline.org/information/position_paper.html
22.
New York State Education Department Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities. (1999) Prevention and Support Services in General Education. Albany, NY: Printing Office .
23.
President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002) A New Era: Revitalizing Special Education for Children and Their Families. Jessup, MD: US Department of Education .
24.
Reschly, D. J. and Ysseldyke, J. E. (1995) ‘School Psychology Paradigm Shift’, in A. Thomas and J. Grimes (eds) Best Practices in School Psychology III, pp. 17-31. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
25.
Reschly, D. J. and Ysseldyke, J. E. (2002) ‘Paradigm Shift: The Past is Not The Future’, in A. Thomas and J. Grimes (eds) Best Practices in School Psychology IV, pp. 3-20. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
26.
Shepard, J. and Dawson, M. M. (1998) ‘Educational and School Psychology in the United Kingdom and the United States: An Introduction’ , School Psychology Review27: 7-13 .
27.
Shepard, L. A. , Smith M. L. and Vojir, C. P. (1983) ‘Characteristics of Pupils Identified as Learning Disabled’ , Educational Research Quarterly20: 309-331 .
28.
Shinn, M. R. and McConnell, S. (1994) ‘Improving General Education Instruction: Relevance to School Psychologists’ , School Psychology Review23: 351-371 .
29.
Truscott, S. D. , McDougal, J. L. and MacKinnon, K. L. (1996, March) ‘WISC-R and WISC-III Verbal-Performance Discrepancy and Subtest Stability Over Time: Implications for Practice and Research’ , paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Atlanta, GA.
30.
Truscott, S. D. , Phelps L. , Sanborn, K. and Lewis, M. (2002, March) ‘An Investigation of the Flynn Effect Using the Woodcock Johnson with a LD Sample’ , paper in symposium presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago, IL.
31.
United Nations Education and Scientific Cultural Organization. (1994) The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Retrieved December 2, 2003, from http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA_E.PDF
32.
United Nations Education and Scientific Cultural Organization. (2001) The Flagship on Education for All and the Right to Education for Persons With Disabilities: Towards Inclusion. Retrieved December 2, 2003, from http://www.unesco.org/education/efa/know_sharing/flagship_initiatives/disability_last_version.shtml
33.
Ysseldyke, J. E. and Algozzine, B. (1982) ‘Bias Among Professionals who Erroneously Declare Students Eligible for Special Services’ , Journal of Experimental Education50: 223-228 .
34.
Ysseldyke, J. E. , Algozzine, B. , Richey, L. and Graden, J. (1982) ‘Declaring Students Eligible for Learning Disability Services: Why Bother With the Data?’ , Learning Disability Quarterly5: 37-44 .
35.
Ysseldyke, J. E. , Christensen, S. L. , Thurlow, M. L. and Bakewell, D. (1989) ‘Are Different Kinds of Instructional Tasks Used By Different Categories of Students in Different Settings?’ , School Psychology Review18: 98-111 .
