In this study of the access process in analogical problem solving, preschoolers, first graders and third graders repeatedly listened to a variety of similar types of source stories until they could recall them completely. They then listened to a target story, were asked to retrieve the source story, were directed to solve a problem in a target story and to verify their responses. We found the following developmental differences: (1) the child could not access structural similarity at all; or the child could not maintain it until he/she reached a solution to the problem; (2) the child did not access structural similarity at first, but he/she re-accessed it during later processes of problem solving; (3) the child accessed structural similarity from the first and was able to maintain it with sound analogy. We described hypothetical reasons for such differences in analogical problem solving and provided suggestions for further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blanchette, T. and Dunbar, K. (2000) `How Analogies are Generated: The Roles of Structural and Superficial Similarity' , Memory and Cognition28: 108-124 .
2.
Brown, A. L., Kane, M. J. and Echols, C. H. (1986) `Young Children's Mental Models Determine Analogical Transfer Across Problems with a Common Goal Structure' , Cognitive Development1: 103-121 .
3.
Chen, Z. and Daehler, M. W. (2000) `External and Internal Instantiation of Abstract Information Facilitates Transfer in Insight Problem Solving' , Contemporary Educational Psycholog, 25: 423-449 .
4.
Chen, Z., Sanchez, R. P. and Campbell, T. (1997) `From Beyond to Within their Grasp: The Rudiments of Analogical Problem Solving in 10-and 13-Montholds' , Developmental Psychology33: 790-801 .
5.
Chen, Z., Yanowitz, K. L. and Daehler, M. W. (1995) `Constraints on Accessing Abstract Source Information: Instantiation of Principles Facilitates Children's Analogical Transfer' , Journal of Educational Psychology87: 445-454 .
6.
Clement, C.A. and Gentner, D. (1991) `Systematicity as a Selection Constraint in Analogical Mapping' , Cognitive Science15: 89-132 .
7.
Daehler, M. W. and Chen, Z. (1993) `Protagonist, Theme, and Goal Object: Effects of Surface Features on Analogical Transfer' , Cognitive Development8: 211-229 .
8.
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D. and Law, K. (1995) `MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval' , Cognitive Science19: 141-205 .
9.
Gentner, D. (1983) `Structure Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy' , Cognitive Science7: 155-170 .
10.
Gentner, D. (1989) `The Mechanisms of Analogical Learning', in S. Vosniaduo and A. Ortony (eds) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, pp. 197-241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
11.
Gentner, D. and Clement, C. (1988) `Evidence for Relational Selectivity in the Interpretation of Analogy and Metaphor', in G.H. Bower (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, vol. 22, pp. 307-358. New York: Academic Press .
12.
Gentner, D. and Markman, A. B. (1997) `Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity' , American Psychologist52: 45-56 .
13.
Gentner, D. and Toupin, C. (1986) `Systematicity and Surface Similarity in the Development of Analogy' , Cognitive Science10: 277-300 .
14.
Gentner, D., Rattermann. M. J. and Forbus. K. D. (1993) `The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability from Inferential Soundness' , Cognitive Psychology25: 524-575 .
15.
Gick, M. L. and Holyoak, K. J. (1980) `Analogical Problem Solving' , Cognitive Psychology12: 306-355 .
16.
Gick, M. L. and Holyoak, K. J. (1983) `Schema Induction and Analogical Transfer' , Cognitive Psychology15: 1-38 .
17.
Goldstone, R. L. (1994) `Similarity Interactive Activation, and Mapping' , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition20: 3-28 .
18.
Goswami, U. (1996) `Analogical Reasoning and Cognitive Development', in H. W. Reese (ed.) Advances in Child Development and Behavior, pp. 91-139. San Diago: Academic Press .
19.
Goswami, U. (2001) `Analogical Reasoning in Children', in D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak and B. N. Kokinov (eds) The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, pp. 437-470. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
20.
Holyoak, K. J. and Thagard, P. (1989) `Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction' , Cognitive Science13: 295-355 .
21.
Holyoak, K. J. and Thagard, P. (1995) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
22.
Holyoak, K. J. and Thagard, P. (1997) `The Analogical Mind' , American Psychologist52:, 35-44 .
23.
Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E. N. and Billman, D. O. (1984) `Development of Analogical Problem-Solving' , Child Development55: 2042-2055 .
24.
Hummel, J. E. and Holyoak, K. J. (1997) `Distributed Representations of Structure: A Theory of Analogical Access and Mapping' , Psychological Review104: 427-466 .
25.
Kim, M. and Choi, K.S. (2001) `The Effect of Similarity on Analogical Retrieval and Transfer' , Korean Journal of Psychology: Development14: 37-62 .
26.
Kokinov, B. N. and Petrov, A. (2001) `Integrating Memory and Reasoning in Analogy-Making: The AMBR Model', in D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak and B. N. Kokinov (eds) The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, pp. 59-124. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
Markman, A.B. and Gentner, D. (1993) `Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons' , Cognitive Psychology23: 431-467 .
29.
Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L. and Gentner, D. (1993) `Respects for Similarity' , Psychological Review100: 254-278 .
30.
Pauen, S. and Wilkening, F. (1997) `Children's Analogical Reasoning about Natural Phenomena' , Journal of Experimental Child Psychology67: 90-113 .
31.
Ross, B. H. (1987) `This is Like That: The Use of Earlier Problems and the Separation of Similarity Effects' , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition13: 629-739 .
32.
Ross, B. H. (1989) `Distinguishing Types of Superficial Similarities: Different Effect on the Access and Use of Earlier Problems' , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition15: 456-468 .
33.
Thagard, P., Holyoak, K. J., Nelson, G. and Gochfeld, D. (1990) `Analog Retrieval by Constraint Satisfaction' , Artificial Intelligence46: 259-310 .
34.
Wharton, C. M., Holyoak, K. J., Downing, P. E., Lange, T. E., Wickens, T. D. and Melz, E. R. (1994) `Below the Surface: Analogical Similarity and Retrieval Competition in Reminding' , Cognitive Psychology26: 64-101 .
