This article discusses how Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) is incorporated into testing practices to define a relatively new addition to the assessment repertory called dynamic assessment. Dynamic assessment (DA) typically follows a pre-test-intervene-posttest format. The author has designed procedures where the intervention portion offers mediational interactions that are designed to promote higher mental functioning in the student. The response of the student to these interventions provides important information about the student's abilities and functioning within a teaching/learning situation. The article first operationalizes MLE in a rating scale and then describes four approaches to DA: a group administered screening procedure; a generic curriculum-based approach; an individual assessment for pre-school children and a procedure for determining eligibility for gifted programming demonstrated to be successful with students from ethnic and linguistic minority backgrounds. Some concluding thoughts about the contribution of MLE to assessment are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aranov, Z. (1999) Reliability and Validity of the Behavioral Observation Rating Scale of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale. Unpublished Master's Thesis: Touro College, New York, USA.
2.
Brooks, N.D. (1997) An Exploratory Study into the Cognitive Modifiability of Preschool Children using DynamicAssessment. Unpublished Master's Thesis: University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne; Newcastle, UK.
3.
Campione, J.C. and Brown, A.L. (1987) 'Linking Dynamic Assessment with School Achievement', in C.S. Lidz (ed.) Dynamic Assessment: An Interactional Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential, pp. 52-81. New York: Guilford.
4.
Carlson,J.S. andWiedl, K.H. (1980)'Applications of aDynamicTestingApproach in Intelligence Assessment: Empirical Results and Theoretical Formulations', Zeitschrift fur Differentiele und Diagnostische Psychologie1: 303-318.
5.
Das, J.P. and Naglieri, J.A. (1997) Das and Naglieri: The Cognitive Assessment System. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing.
6.
Feuerstein, R. and Feuerstein, S. (1991) 'Mediated Learning Experience: A Theoretical Review', in R. Feuerstein, P.S. Klein and Abraham J. Tannenbaum (eds) Mediated Learning Experience (MLE): Theoretical, Psychosocial and Learning Implications, pp. 3-51. London: Freund.
7.
Feuerstein, R. , Rand, Y. and Hoffman, M.B. (1979) The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
8.
Feuerstein, R. , Rand, Y., Hoffman, M.B. and Miller, R. (1980) Instrumental Enrichment:An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
9.
Jepsen, R.H. and Lidz, C.S. (2000) 'Group Dynamic Assessment Procedure: Reliability and Validity of a Cognitive Assessment Procedure with Adolescents with Developmental Disabilities', Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology1(1) (via www.iace.coged.org).
10.
Jitendra, A.K. and Rohena-Diaz, E. (1996) 'Language Assessment of Students who are Linguistically Diverse: Why a Discrete Approach is not the Answer', School Psychology Review25: 40-56.
11.
Jitendra, A.K. , Rohena-Diaz, E. and Nolet, V. (1998) 'A Dynamic CurriculumBased Language Assessment: Planning Instruction for Special Needs Students who are Linguistically Diverse', Preventing School Failure42: 182-185.
12.
Kahn, R.J. (2000) 'Dynamic Assessment of Infants and Toddlers', in C.S. Lidz and J.G. Elliott (eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.
13.
Kaufman, A.S. and Kaufman, N.L. (1983) K-ABC. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children: Administration and Scoring Manual and Interpretive Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14.
Levy, C. (1999) The Discriminant Validity of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): A Performance Comparison Between Typically Developing and Special Needs Preschool Children. Unpublished Master's Thesis: Touro College, New York, USA.
15.
Lidz, C.S. (1981) ImprovingAssessment of School Children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Lidz, C.S. (1991a) 'MLE Components and Their Roots in Theory and Research', in R. Feuerstein, P.S. Klein and A.J. Tannenbaum (eds) Mediated Learning Experience (MLE): Theoretical, Psychosocial and Learning Implications, pp. 271-291. London: Freund.
17.
Lidz, C.S. (1991b) Practitioners' Guide to Dynamic Assessment. New York: Guilford.
18.
Lidz, C.S. and Greenberg, K.H. (1997) 'Criterion Validity of a Group Dynamic Assessment Procedure with Rural First Grade Regular Education Students', Journal of Cognitive Education6: 89-99.
19.
Lidz, C.S. and Jepsen, R.H. (1997) 'Relationships Between Cognitive Processes and Academic Achievement: Application of a Group Dynamic Assessment Procedure with Multiply Handicapped Adolescents', Educational and Child Psychology14: 56-67.
20.
Lidz, C.S. and Jepsen, R.H. (1999) Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS). New York: Touro College [available from the author, C.S. Lidz].
21.
Lidz, C.S. and Macrine, S.L. (2000) 'An Alternative Approach to the Identification of Gifted Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners: The Contribution of Dynamic Assessment', School Psychology International22(1): 74-96.
22.
Naglieri, J.A. (1997) Nonverbal Ability Test: Multilevel Technical Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
23.
Shurin, R. (1998) Validity and Reliability of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale with Preschool Children with Disabilities. Unpublished Master's Thesis: Touro College, New York, USA.
24.
Tzuriel, D. , Samuels, M.T. and Feuerstein, R. (1988) 'Non-Intellective Factors in Dynamic Assessment', in R.M. Gupta and P. Coxhead (eds) Cultural Diversity and Learning Efficiency, pp. 141-163. New York: MacMillan.
25.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner and E. Souberman, eds). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
