Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2002-02
A Thinking Journey Based on Constructivism and Mediated Learning Experience as a Vehicle for Teaching Science to Low Functioning Students and Enhancing Their Cognitive Skills
An Experimental Astronomy Curriculum or Thinking Journey was developed on the basis of a combination of Constructivism and Mediated Learning Experience (MLE). The Thinking Journey was designed to serve as a vehicle for promoting a process of conceptual change in a wide range of students. Its theoretical background, curriculum and an experiment to test its effectiveness with a class of low functioning high school girls are documented here. The study included an experimental (E) and control (C) group, each of which comprised 16 9th grade students. E focused on the concept of Earth within the framework of the Thinking Journey, while C was exposed to the conventional approach to the study of Earth within the Earth Studies curriculum. The results indicated the relative effectiveness of the Thinking Journey in promoting a process of positive change in the students' conceptualization of Earth, improving their knowledge of astronomy, enhancing their general scientific knowledge and developing their cognitive functioning and problem solving abilities. These findings are discussed in terms of the usefulness of utilizing a scientific subject as part of an educational intervention designed to enhance the cognitive abilities of low functioning students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baxter, J. (1989) 'Children's Understanding of Familiar Astronomical Events', International Journal of Science Education11 (Special Issue): 502-513.
2.
Driver, R. and Oldham, V. (1985) 'A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Design in Science', Studies in Science Education13: 105-122.
3.
Driver, R. , Guesne, E. and Tiberghien, A. (1985a) 'Children's Ideas and the Learning of Science', in R. Driver, E. Guesne and A. Tiberghien (eds) Children's Ideas in Science, Chapter 1. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
4.
Driver, R. , Guesne, E. and Tiberghien, A. (1985b) 'Some Features of Children's Ideas and their Implications for Teaching', in R. Driver, E. Guesne and A. Tiberghien (eds) Children's Ideas in Science, Chapter 10. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
5.
Feuerstein, R. (1998) 'The Theory of Mediated Learning Experience About Human as a Modifiable Being'. Tel Aviv. Ministry of Defence.
6.
Feuerstein, R. , Feuerstein, Ra. and Schur, Y. (1997) 'Process as Content in Regular Education and in Particular in Education of the Low Functioning Retarded Performer', in A.L. Costa and R.M. Liebmann (eds) Supporting the Spirit of Learning: When Process is Content. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7.
Feuerstein, R. and Feuerstein, S. (1991) 'MLE: A Theoretical Review' in R. Feuerstein, P. Klein and A. Tannenbaum (eds) Mediated Learning Experience: Theoretical, Psychological and Educational Implications, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mediated Learning Experience. London: Freund.
8.
Feuerstein, R. , Rand, Y. and Hoffman, M.B. (1979) The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments and Techniques, Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
9.
Feuerstein, R. , Rand, Y., Hoffman, M.B. and Miller, R. (1980) Instrumental Enrichment:An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
10.
Feuerstein, R. , Rand, Y., Hoffman, M.B., Egozi, M. and Ben-Shachar-Segev, N. (1991) 'Intervention Programs for Retarded Performers: Goals, Means and Expected Outcomes', in L. Idol and B. Jones (eds) Educational Values and Cognitive Instruction: Implication for Reform (Vol 2), pp. 139-178. Hillsboro NJ: Erlbaum with NCREL.
11.
Feuerstein, R. , Rand, Y. and Rynders, J.E. (1988) Don't Accept Me as I Am Helping 'Retarded'People to Excel. New York: Plenum.
12.
Gavish, T. (1997) 'Developing Mathematical Thinking with the Help of Instrumental Enrichment', inA. Kozulin (ed.) The Ontogeny of Cognitiue Modifiability, pp. 37-46. Jerusalem: ICELP.
13.
Howe, A.C. (1996) 'Development of Science Concepts within a Vygotskian Framework', Science Education80(1): 35-51.
14.
Mehl, M.C. (1985) The Cognitive Difficulties of First Year Physics Students at the University of Western Cape and Various Compensatory Programs. South Africa, University of Cape Town.
15.
Mehl, M.C. (1991) 'Mediated Learning Experience at University Level A Case Study', in R. Feuerstein, P.S. Klein and A.J. Tannenbaum (eds) Mediated Learning Experience (MLE): Theoretical, Psychological and Learning Implications, pp. 157-178. London: Freund.
16.
Myklebust, H.R. (1983) 'Toward a Science of Learning Disabilities', Journal of Learning Disabilities16(1): 17-18.
17.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (1993) 'A Reaction to Full Inclusion: A Reaffirmation of the Right of Students with Learning Disabilities to a Continuum of Services', Journal of Learning Disabilities26(9): 596-596.
18.
Nussbaum, J. (1971) An Approach to Teaching and Assessment: The Earth Concept at the Second Grade Level. PhD Thesis, Cornell University.
19.
Nussbaum, J. (1985) 'The Earth as a Cosmic Body', in R. Driver, E. Guesne and A. Tiberghien (eds) Children's Ideas in Science, Chapter 9. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
20.
Perrig, W. and Kintsch, W. (1985) 'Propositional and Situational Representations of Text', Journal of Memory and Language24: 503-518.
21.
Schur, Y. (1998)A Thinking Journey to the Moon. Tel-Aviv: Ma'alot. [in Hebrew]
22.
Sharoni-Dagan, N. (1979) The Influence of Instruction on the Concept of Earth of Second Grade ChildrenIsrael Science Teaching Center: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. [in Hebrew]
23.
Strang, J. and Shayer, M. (1993) 'Enhancing High School Students' Achievement in Chemistry Through a Thinking Skills Approach', International Journal of Science Education15(3): 319-337.
24.
Strauss, S. (1987) 'Educational-Developmental Psychology and School Learning' in L. Liben (ed.) Development and Learning: Conflict or Convergence?Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Tamir, P. , Levine, T., Levi, A., Chen, D. and Zozovski, R. (1988) Science Teaching in Israel in the 80s. Jerusalem: The Amos De-Shalit Israeli Center for Science Teaching. [in Hebrew]
26.
Vosniadou, S. (1994) 'Capturing and Modeling the Process of Conceptual Change', Learning and Instruction4: 45-69.
27.
Vosniadou, S. and Brewer, W.F. (1990) 'A Cross Cultural Investigation of Children's Conceptions about the Earth, the Sun and the Moon: Greek and American data', in H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennett and H.F. Friedrid (eds) Learning and Instruction. European Research in an International Context, Volume 2.2. Papers of the Second Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction held at the University of Tubingen, 1987. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
28.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1986) Thought and Language (rev. edn). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
Williams, M. and Burden, R.L. (1997) Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
