This paper provides an overview of some of the advantages of the Principles and Parameters approach to language acquisition research, and suggests that modularity is a particularly helpful feature of this approach. It argues that serious attention to modularity clarifies research thinking, encouraging us to examine the boundaries between modules in constructive ways. Particular attention is paid to the boundary between syntax and pragmatics as illustrative of such boundary issues in general. Researchers are encouraged to examine other frameworks for their contributions to a more eclectic view of language acquisition than currently popular, with the anticipation that it will lead to a healthy interaction between the contributions of different approaches.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, M. (1982). Explanations in the Study of Child Language Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
2.
— (1987). Mechanisms for language acquisition. First Language, 7(1), 3-30.
3.
— (1992). Children's Syntax: An Introduction to Principles and Parameters Theory (Oxford: BasilBlackwell).
4.
Braine, M. (1994). Is nativism sufficient? Journal of Child Language, 21(1), 9-31
5.
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages ( London: George Allen & Unwin).
6.
Cairns, H., McDaniel, D., Hsu, J.R. & Rapp, M. (1994). A longitudinal study of principles of control and pronominal reference in child English. Language, 70 (2), 260-88.
7.
Chien, Y-C. & Wexler, K. (1990). Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1(3), 225-95.
8.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
9.
— (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding ( Dordrecht: Foris).
10.
— (1986). Barriers (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
11.
— (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & J. Keyser (eds), The View From Building 20 ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
12.
Crain, S. & McKee, C. (1985). Acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora . Proceedings of New England Linguistic Society, 16, 94-110.
13.
Demuth, K. (1989). Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language, 65 (1), 56-80.
14.
Fodor, J.A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
15.
Foster, S. (1990a). Developmental pragmatics. In H. Winitz (ed.), Human Communication and Its Disorders: A Review-1990 (Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation).
16.
— (1990b). The Communicative Competence of Young Children (Harlow: Longman Group).
17.
Foster-Cohen, S. (1994). Exploring the boundary between syntax and pragmatics: relevance and the binding of pronouns. Journal of Child Language , 21, 237-55.
18.
Gass, S. (1989). Language universals and second language acquisition . Language Learning, 39, 497-534.
19.
Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form (New York: Academic Press).
20.
Goodluck, H. (1991). Language Acquisition: A Linguistic Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell).
21.
Greenfield, P. & Smith, J. (1976). The Structure of Communication in Early Language Development (London: Academic Press ).
22.
Grimshaw, J. & Rosen, S. (1990). Knowledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2), 187-222.
23.
Gunnar, M.R. & Maratsos, M. (eds) (1992). Modularity and Constraints in Language and Cognition. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 25 (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
24.
Huang, C.-T.J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns . Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4),531-74.
25.
Hyams, N. (1986). Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters (Dordrecht: Foris).
26.
— (1992). A reanalysis of null subjects in child language . In J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck & T. Roeper (eds), Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition: Continuity and Change in Development (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
27.
Lebeaux, D. (1988). Language acquisition and the form of the grammar . PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
28.
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
29.
Maratsos, M. (1992). Constraints, modules, and domain specificity: an introduction. In M. R. Gunnar & M. Maratsos (eds), Modularity and Constraints in Language and Cognition. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 25 (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
30.
McDaniel, D., Cairns, H.S. & Hsu, J.R. (1990/1991). Control principles in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition, 1(4), 297-335.
31.
McKee, C. (1992). A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition. Language Acquisition, 2(1), 21-54.
32.
Miller, J.F., Chapman, R., Bronston, M. & Reichle, J. (1980). Language comprehension in sensorimotor stages V and VI. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 284-311.
33.
Otsu, Y. (1981). Universal grammar and syntactic development in children: toward a theory of syntactic development. PhD dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology.
34.
Peters, A. (1985). Language segmentation: operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical Issues (Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum).
35.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.) (1980). Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ).
36.
Pinker, S. (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
37.
— (1988). Learnability theory and the acquisition of a first language. In F. Kessel (ed.), The Development of Language and Language Researchers: Essays in Honor of Roger Brown (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ).
38.
— (1989). Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
39.
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of Englash Syntax (Oxford: Basil Blackwell ).
40.
Reinhart, T. (1981). Definite NP anaphora and c-command domains. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 605-35.
41.
Roeper, T. (1988). Theory and explanation in acquisition. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 27, 162-67.
42.
Slobin, D. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical Issues (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ).
43.
(1988 ). Confessions of a wayward Chomskyan. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 27, 131-36.
44.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
45.
Weissenborn, J. (1992). Null subjects in early grammars: implications for parameter-setting theories. In J. Weissenborn , H. Goodluck & T. Roeper (eds), Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition: Continuity and Change in Development (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
