Although several researchers have claimed that overgeneralization of progressive markers rarely, if ever, occurs, the validity of such claims has been questioned. In this study, the spontaneous speech of three children acquiring English, and of their mothers, was analysed for their use of verbs with respect to stativity and progressive marking. The results show that overgeneralization of progressive inflections to stative verbs does occur, and that the mother of a child who frequently produced stative progressives also used stative progressives substantially, while the other two mothers never used them in speech addressed to their children. The strong association observed between maternal speech and the pattern of children's use of verb morphology casts doubts on the claim that the lack of overgeneralization is innate (Bickerton 1981). A prototype account of the phenomenon is proposed as an alternative.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aitchison, J. (1983). On roots of languageLanguage & Communication, 3, 83-97.
2.
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of Language (Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma).
3.
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child languageLanguage, 56, 386-412.
4.
Brinton, L.J. (1988). The Development of English Aspectual Systems Aspectualizers and Post-verbal Particles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
5.
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
6.
Clark, H. & Clark, E.V. (1977). Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich ).
7.
Cziko, G.A. (1989). A review of the state-process and punctual-nonpunctual distinctions in children's acquisition of verbs. First Language, 9, 1-31.
8.
Cziko, G.A. & Koda, K. (1987). A Japanese child's use of stative and punctual verbsJournal of Child Language, 14, 99-111.
9.
Dowty, D.R. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).
10.
Horiguchi, S. (1981). Nenshooyoo no asupekuto In M. Hori & F. Peng (eds), Aspects of Language Acquisition : Gengo Shuutoku no Shosoo (Hiroshima: Bunka Hyooron).
11.
Kuczaj, S.A. (1976). -ing, -s, and -ed. a study of the acquisition of certain verb inflections. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
12.
- ( 1978). Why do children fail to overgeneralize the progressive inflection?Journal of Child Language , 5, 167-171.
13.
- ( 1989). On the search for universals of language acquisition: a commentary on CzikoFirst Language, 9, 39-44
14.
Labov, W. (1975). What is a Linguistic Fact? ( Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press).
15.
Li, P. (1989). Aspect and aktionsart in child Mandarin Doctoral dissertation, Leiden, Netherlands: University of Leiden.
16.
MacWhinney, B. (1991). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ).
17.
MacWhmney, B. & Snow, C.E. (1985). The Child Language Data Exchange SystemJournal of Chald Language, 12, 271-296.
18.
- ( 1990). The Child Language Data Exchange System: an updateJournal of Child Language, 17, 457-472.
19.
Mapstone, E.R. & Harris, P.L. (1985). Is the English present progressive unique?Journal of Chald Language, 12, 431-441.
20.
Meisel, J.M. (1983). Language development and linguistic theory. (Review of: Derek Bickerton, Roots of Language)Lingua , 61, 231-257.
21.
Mourelatos, A.P. (1981). Events, processes, and states In P. J. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (eds), Syntax and Semantics , Vol. 14: Tense and Aspect ( New York: Academic Press).
22.
Rispoli, M. (1990). Lexical assignability and perspective switch: the acquisition of verb subcategorization for aspectual inflectionsJournal of Child Language, 17, 375-392.
23.
Sachs, J. (1983). Talking about the there and then: the emergence of displaced reference in parent-child discourse In K. E. Nelson (ed.), Children's Language, Vol. 4 (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ) .
24.
Sag, I.A. (1973). On the state of progress on progressives and statives In C. J. N. Bailey & R. Shuy (eds), New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press).
25.
Shirai, Y. (1991). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition: simplified input and prototype. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
26.
Slobin, D.I. (1981). The origins of grammatical encoding of events In W. Deutsch (ed.), The Child's Construction of Language (London: Academic Press).
27.
Smith, C.S. (1983). A theory of aspectual choiceLanguage, 59, 479-501.
28.
- ( 1991). The Parameter of Aspe(t (Dordrecht : Kluwer).
29.
Snow, C.E. (1977). Mother's speech research: from input to interaction In C. E. Snow & C. A. Ferguson (eds), Talking to Children- Language Input and Acquisition (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press).
30.
Taylor, J.R. (1989). Linguistic Categorization Prototypes in Linguistic Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
31.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in Philosophy ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
32.
Weist, R.M. (1989). Aspects of the roots of language: commentary on CzikoFirst Language, 9, 45-49
33.
Weist, R.M., Wysocka, H., Witkowska-Stadnik, K., Buczowska, E. & Komeczna, E. (1984). The defective tense hypothesis: on the emergence of tense and aspect in child PolishJournal of Child Language, 11, 347-374.
34.
Youseff, V. (1988). The language bioprogram hypothesis revisitedJournal of Child Language, 15, 451-458.
35.
- ( 1990). On the confirmation of bioprogramsJournal of Child Language, 17 , 233-235.
