Abstract
Children's use of the connective and during narration was studied. Semantic analyses of the relationships between connected sentences showed that and is heavily used for a range of meanings, including those for which more specific connectives (such as causal or temporal ones) would be more appropriate. Few differences were found bet ween juxtaposed narrative sentences that had no connective and those that were joined by and. It was concluded that semantic relationship is not an adequate explanation for why and is used. Rather, pragmatic functions seem to be important: and is more commonly used when the child is producing thematically related speech (i.e., within versus between narratives) and is associated with longer conversational turns. And seems to function as a generalized signal of cohesion between sentences and an indication that the narrator's conversational turn is not over.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
