Sentences conveying either non-redundant or increasingly redundant information about number were presented to 22 nursery school children. Comprehension of sentential number was tested by means of a picture-pointing and an acting-out task. Overall findings showed that sentences containing several number markers were interpreted more reliably than those with only one number marker, and that number markers occurring in a noun phrase were better understood than those occurring in a verb phrase. Analysis of individual data revealed three different response patterns, showing that redundant number marking is used in more than one way during the acquisition of the number system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Crystal, D. (1980). A First Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (London: Deutsch).
2.
Dewart, H. (1975). A psychological investigation of sentence comprehension by children. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of London.
3.
Harris, M. (1976). The influence of reversibility and truncation on the interpretation of the passive voice by young children. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 419-428.
4.
— (1977). Syntactic and semantic factors in the acquisition of the passive voice by young children. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of London.
5.
— (in press). The acquisition of number markers. In K. Durkin (ed.), Language Development during the School Years (London: Croom Helm).
6.
Keeney, T.J. & Smith, N.S. (1971). Young children's imitation and comprehension of sentential singularity and plurality. Language and Speech , 14, 372-382.
7.
Keeney, T.J. & Wolfe, J. (1972). The acquisition of agreement in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 698-705.
8.
Kuczaj, S.A. (1982). On the nature of syntactic development. In S. A. Kuczaj (ed.), Language Development Volume 1: Syntax and Semantics (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum).
9.
Maratsos, M.P. (1982). The child's construction of grammatical categories . In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (eds), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
10.
Maratsos, M.P. & Chalkley , M.A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories . In K. E. Nelson (ed.), Children's Language Volume 2 ( New York: Gardner Press).
11.
Maratsos, M.P. & Kuczaj, S.A. (1976). Preschool children's use of not and n't. Papers and Reports in Child Language Research (Stanford University). 12, 157-168.
12.
Nicolaci-da-Costa, A.M. (1983). Number markers in non-redundant and redundant sentences: interpretation and use by young children. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
13.
Nicolaci-da-Costa, A. & Harris, M. (1983). Redundancy of syntactic information: an aid to young children's comprehension of sentential number. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 343-352.
14.
— (1984). Young children's comprehension of number markers . British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2,105-111.
