The spontaneous speech of fifteen children was examined in order to test two hypotheses: (1) newly acquired forms are first used to express previously acquired meanings; (2) newly acquired meanings are first expressed by pre viously acquired forms. The data provide support for these hypotheses, but also demonstrate other relations between the acquisition of linguistic forms and meanings. The implications of the findings for theories of language development are briefly considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bloom, L. (1970). Language Development. Form and Function in Emerging Grammars (Cambndge, MassM I T Press )
2.
Brown, R. (1973) A First Language. The Early Stages ( Cambndge, Mass.Harvard University Press).
3.
Cassirer, E. (1955) The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Vol. I (New Haven, Conn.Yale University Press )
4.
Cromer, R. (1968) 'The development of temporal reference during the acquisition of language'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
5.
Cromer, R. (1974) ' The development of language and cognition the cognition hypothesis'. In B Foss (ed.), New Perspectives in Child Development (Harmondsworth, MiddlesexPenguin Books)
6.
Flavell, J. (1971) 'Stage-related properties of cognitive development ' Cognitive Psychology, 2, 421-453.
7.
Flavell, J. (1972) 'An analysis of cognitive-developmental sequences'Genetic Psychology Monographs, 86, 279-350
8.
Greenfield, P. ,& Smith,J. (1976) The Structure of communication in Early Language Development ( New YorkAcademic Press)
9.
Schlesinger, I. (1975) 'Grammatical development — the first steps' In E Lenneberg & E Lenneberg (eds), Foundations of Language Development, Vol. 1 (New YorkAcademic Press)
10.
Slobm, D. (1973) 'Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar' In C Ferguson & D. Slobm (eds), Studies of Child Language DevelopmentNew YorkHolt, Rinehart, & Winston)
11.
Werner, H. , & Kaplan, B. (1963) Symbol Formation (New York : Wiley )
