This study investigates prosodic modulation in the spontaneous canonical babble of congenitally deaf infants with cochlear implants (CI) and normally hearing (NH) infants. Research has shown that the acoustic cues to prominence are less modulated in CI babble. However acoustic measurements of individual cues to prominence give incomplete information about prosodic modulation. In the present study, raters are asked to judge prominence since they simultaneously take into account all prosodic cues. Disyllabic utterances produced by CI and NH infants were presented to naive adult raters who had to indicate the degree and direction of prosodic modulation between syllables on a visual analogue scale. The results show that the babble of infants with CI is rated as having less prosodic modulation. Moreover, segmentally more variegated babble is rated as having more prosodic modulation. Raters do not perceive the babble to be predominantly trochaic, which indicates that the predominant stress pattern of Dutch is not yet apparent in the children’s productions.
BaayenH. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB. M.WalkerS. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
3.
CarterA.DillonC.PisoniD. (2002). Imitation of nonwords by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants: Suprasegmental analyses. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16, 619–638.
4.
ClementC. J. (2004). Development of vocalizations in deaf and normally hearing children (Doctoral dissertation). Universiteit van Amsterdam, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
DaelemansW.GillisS.DurieuxG. (1994). The acquisition of stress: A data-oriented approach. Computational Linguistics, 20, 421–451.
7.
DavisB.MacNeilageP.MatyearC.PowellJ. (2000). Prosodic correlates of stress in babbling: An acoustical study. Child Development, 71, 1258–1270.
8.
De Boysson-BardiesB.HalléP.SagartL.DurandC. (1989). A crosslinguistic investigation of vowel formants in babbling. Journal of Child Language, 6, 1–17.
9.
De Boysson-BardiesB.VihmanM. (1991). Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language, 67, 297–319.
10.
De ClerckI.PettinatoM.VerhoevenJ.GillisS. (2017). Is prosodic production driven by lexical development? Longitudinal evidence from babble and words. Journal of Child Language, 44, 1248–1273.
11.
DettmanS.DowellR.ChooD.ArnottW.AbrahamsY.DavisA.. . . BriggsR. (2016). Long-term communication outcomes for children receiving cochlear implants younger than 12 months: A multicenter study. Otology & Neurotology, 37(2), e82–e95.
12.
DrennanW. R.RubinsteinJ. T. (2008). Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45, 779–789.
13.
EngstrandO.WilliamsK.LacerdaF. (2003). Does babbling sound native? Listener responses to vocalizations produced by Swedish and American 12- and 18-month-olds. Phonetica, 60, 17–44.
14.
FaganM. K. (2015). Why repetition? Repetitive babbling, auditory feedback, and cochlear implantation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 125–136.
15.
FlegeJ. E.BohnO. S. (1989). An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 35–62.
16.
FriedericiA.FriedrichM.ChristopheA. (2007). Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specfic. Current Biology, 17, 1208–1211.
17.
FryD. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language & Speech, 1, 126–152.
18.
GreenT.FaulknerA.RosenS. (2004). Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2298–2310.
19.
HalléP.De Boysson-BardiesB.VihmanM. (1991). Beginnings of prosodic organization: Intonation and duration patterns of disyllables produced by Japanese and French infants. Language & Speech, 34, 299–318.
20.
HideO. (2013). Acoustic features of speech by young cochlear implant users. A comparison with normal-hearing and hearing-aided age mates (Doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
21.
JulienH.MunsonB. (2012). Modifying speech to children based on their perceived phonetic accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 55, 1836–1849.
22.
JusczykP.CutlerA.RedanzN. (1993). Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675–687.
23.
KentR. D.OsbergerM. J.NetsellR.HusteddeC. G. (1987). Phonetic development in identical twins differing in auditory function. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 52, 64–75.
24.
Koopmans-van BeinumF.ClementC.van den Dikkenberg-PotI. (2001). Babbling and the lack of auditory speech perception: A matter of coordination?Developmental Science, 4, 61–70.
25.
LendenJ.FlipsenP. (2007). Prosody and voice characteristic of children with cochlear implants. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40, 66–81.
26.
LevineD.Strother-GarciaK.GolinkoffR. M.Hirsh-PasekK. (2016). Language development in the first year of life: What deaf children might be missing before cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 37(2), e56–e62.
27.
LiF.EdwardsJ.BeckmanM. (2009). Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 111–124.
28.
LiebermanP. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 451–454.
29.
McAllister ByunT.HarelD.HalpinP. F.SzerediD. (2016). Deriving gradient measures of child speech from crowdsourced ratings. Journal of Communication Disorders, 64, 91–102.
30.
MeisterH.LandwehrM.PyschnyV.WagnerP.WalgerM. (2011). The perception of sentence stress in cochlear implant recipients. Ear & Hearing, 32, 459–467.
31.
MolemansI. (2011). Sounds like babbling: A longitudinal investigation of aspects of the prelexical speech repertoire in young children acquiring Dutch (Doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
32.
MolemansI.Van den BergR.Van SeverenL.GillisS. (2011). How to measure the onset of babbling reliably?Journal of Child Language, 39, 523–552.
33.
MooreB. C. J. (2003). Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants. Otology & Neurotology, 24, 243–254.
34.
MunsonB.CarlsonK. U. (2016). An exploration of methods for rating children’s productions of sibilant fricatives. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 19, 36–45.
35.
MunsonB.PayestehB. (2013, November14–16). Clinical feasibility of visual analog scaling. Paper presented at the 2013 Convention of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, Chicago, IL.
36.
MunsonB.SchellingerS. K.CarlsonK. U. (2012). Measuring speech-sound learning using visual analog scaling. SIG 1 Perspectives on Language Learning & Education, 19, 19–30.
37.
NittrouerS.Caldwell-TarrA.LowensteinJ. H. (2013). Working memory in children with cochlear implants: Problems are in storage, not processing. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 77, 1886–1898.
38.
O’HalpinR. (2010). The perception and production of stress and intonation by children with cochlear implants (Doctoral dissertation). University College London, London, England.
39.
OllerD.EilersR. (1988). The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Development, 59, 441–449.
40.
PettinatoM.De ClerckI.VerhoevenJ.GillisS. (2017). Expansion of prosodic abilities at the transition from babble to words: A comparison between children with cochlear implants and normally hearing children. Ear & Hearing, 38, 475–486.
41.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org
42.
RamusF. (2002). Language discrimination by newborns: Teasing apart phonotactic, rhythmic, and intonational cues. Annual Review of Language Acquisition, 2, 85–115.
43.
SchauwersK. (2006). Early speech and language development in deaf children with a cochlear implant: A longitudinal investigation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
44.
SchauwersK.GillisS.GovaertsP. J. (2008). The characteristics of prelexical babbling after cochlear implantation between 5 and 20 months of age. Ear & Hearing, 29, 627–637.
45.
ScobbieJ. M.GibbonF.HardcastleW. J.FletcherP. (1996). Covert contrast as a stage in the acquisition of phonetics and phonology. QMC Working Papers in Speech and Language Sciences, 1, 13–62.
Stoel-GammonC.OtomoK. (1986). Babbling development of hearing impaired and normally hearing subjects. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 51, 33–41.
48.
TomblinJ.BarkerB.SpencerL.ZhangX.GantzB. (2005). The effect of age at cochlear implant initial stimulation on expressive language growth in infants and toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 48, 853–867.
49.
TorppaR.FaulknerA.HuotilainenM.JarvikiviJ.LipsanenJ.LaasonenM.VainioM. (2014). The perception of prosody and associated auditory cues in early-implanted children: The role of auditory working memory and musical activities. International Journal of Audiology, 53, 182–191.
50.
Van den BergR. (2012). Syllables inside out. A longitudinal study of the development of syllable types in toddlers acquiring Dutch: A comparison between hearing impaired children with a cochlear implant and normally hearing children (Doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
51.
van den Dikkenberg-PotI.Koopmans-van BeinumF.ClementC. (1998, August23–27). Influence of lack of auditory speech perception on sound productions of deaf infants. Paper presented at the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
52.
Van SeverenL. (2012). A large-scale longitudinal survey of consonant development in toddlers’ spontaneous speech (Doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Beglium.
53.
WhalenD.LevittA.WangQ. (1991). Intonational differences between the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language, 18, 501–516.
54.
ZinkI.LejaegereM. (2001). N-CDIs: lijsten voor communicatieve ontwikkeling. Aanpassing en hernormering van de MacArthur CDI’s van Fenson et al. [N-CDIs: Lists for communicative development. Adaptation and re-standardization of the MacArthur CDIs of Fenson et al.] Leuven, Belgium: ACCO.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
