Three experiments examined whether the experience of individuating an object would affect the way that children of different ages would interpret its label. Participants were asked to remember a novel object and pick it out from sets containing either two similar objects (similar condition) or no similar objects (dissimilar condition). They were then taught a label for the object and tested for how broadly they generalized it. Because children in the similar condition had formed a more detailed representation of the object, they were expected to generalize its label less broadly. For artifacts, this effect was observed in 4- and 5-year-olds as well as first and second graders, but not in 3-year-olds or adults. For toy animals, no age group showed this effect, and the three oldest groups of children showed the opposite effect. Various explanations for why the consequences of individuating an object for the interpretation of its label depend on age of the learner and the object’s ontological kind are discussed.
BoothA. E.WaxmanS. R. (2002). Word learning is ‘smart’: Evidence that conceptual information affects preschoolers’ extension of novel words. Cognition, 84, B11–B22. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00015
2.
BrandoneA. C.GelmanS. A. (2009). Differences in preschoolers’ and adults’ use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide. Cognition, 110, 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.005
3.
CarrollM. V.ByrneB.KirsnerK. (1985). Autobiographical memory and perceptual learning: A developmental study using picture recognition, naming latency, and perceptual identification. Memory & Cognition, 13, 273–279.
4.
CycowiczY. M.FriedmanD.SnodgrassJ. G.DuffM. (2001). Recognition and source memory for pictures in children and adults. Neuropsychologia, 39, 255–267. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00108-1
5.
GelmanS. A. (1988). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 65–95. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90025-4
6.
GelmanS. A.O’ReillyA. W. (1988). Children’s inductive inferences within superordinate categories: The role of language and category structure. Child Development, 59, 876–887. doi:10.2307/1130255
7.
GelmanS. A.RamanL. (2003). Preschool children use linguistic form class and pragmatic cues to interpret generics. Child Development, 74, 308–325. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00537
8.
GelmanS. A.TaylorM. (1984). How two-year-old children interpret proper and common names for unfamiliar objects. Child Development, 55, 1535–1540. doi:10.2307/1130023
9.
GentnerD.AnggoroF. K.KlibanoffR. S. (2011). Structure-mapping and relational language support children’s learning of relational categories. Child Development, 82, 1173–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01599
10.
GentnerD.NamyL. L. (1999). Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development, 14, 487–513. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(99)00016-7
11.
Goldin-MeadowS.GelmanS. A.MylanderC. (2005). Expressing generic concepts with and without a language model. Cognition, 96, 109–126. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.003
12.
HammerR.DiesendruckG. (2005). The role of dimensional distinctiveness in children’s and adults’ artifact categorization. Psychological Science, 16, 137–144. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00794
13.
HerrmannP.WaxmanS. R.MedinD. L. (2010). Anthropocentricism is not the first step in children’s reasoning about the natural world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 9979–9984. doi:10.1073/panas.1004440107
Houston-PriceC.PlunkettK.HarrisP. (2005). ‘Word-learning wizardry’ at 1;6. Journal of Child Language, 32, 175–189. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006610
16.
ImaiM.HaryuE.OkadaH. (2005). Mapping novel nouns and verbs onto dynamic action events: Are verb meanings easier to learn than noun meanings for Japanese children?Child Development, 76, 340–355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00849_a.x
17.
JonesS. S.SmithL. B. (2002). How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names. Developmental Science, 5, 219–232. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00224
18.
JonesS. S.SmithL. B.LandauB. (1991). Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning. Child Development, 62, 499–516. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01547.x
19.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
KatzN.BakerE.MacnamaraJ. (1974). What’s in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper names. Child Development, 45, 469–473.
21.
KerstenA. W.GoldstoneR. L.ShaffertA. (1998). Two competing attentional mechanisms in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1437–1458. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1437
22.
KerstenA. W.SmithL. B. (2002). Attention to novel objects during verb learning. Child Development, 73, 93–109. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00394
23.
KruschkeJ. K. (1996). Dimensional relevance shifts in category learning. Connection Science, 8, 225–247. doi:10.1080/095400996116893
24.
LandauB.SmithL. B.JonesS. S. (1998). Object shape, object function, and object name. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 1–27.
25.
MacnamaraJ. (1982). Names for things: A study of child language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
MerrimanW. E. (1999). Competition, attention, and young children’s lexical processing. In MacWhinneyB. (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 331–358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
MerrimanW. E.SchusterJ. M.HagerL. (1991). Are names ever mapped onto preexisting categories?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 288–300. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.120.3.288
28.
MerrimanW. E.ScottP.MarazitaJ. (1993). An appearance-function shift in children’s object naming. Journal of Child Language, 20, 101–118.
29.
NamyL. L.GentnerD. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears: Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 5–15. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.5
30.
NewcombeN.RogoffB.KaganJ. (1977). Developmental changes in recognition memory for pictures of objects and scenes. Developmental Psychology, 13, 337–341. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.13.4.337
31.
RigneyJ. C.CallananM. A. (2011). Patterns in parent–child conversations about animals at a marine science center. Cognitive Development, 26, 155–171. doi:10.1016/cogdev.2010.12.002
32.
WoodwardA.MarkmanE.FitzsimmonsC. M. (1994). Rapid word learning in 13- to 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 30, 553–566. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.4.553
33.
XuF.TenenbaumJ. B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245–272. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.245
34.
YoshidaH.SmithL. B. (2001). Early noun lexicons in English and Japanese. Cognition, 82, 63–74. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00153-6
35.
ZelazoP. D. (2004). The development of conscious control in childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 12–17. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.001
