During the first years of language development, toddlers coordinate multiple cues in order to acquire the plural form. The aim of this study was to manipulate object similarity as well as set size in order to determine whether these variables impact children’s comprehension of plurality. One-hundred-and-fifty children ranging in age from 22 to 36 months were provided puzzles with pieces containing arrays of similar or identical objects. Each puzzle was composed of pieces displaying sets of two, four, six, or eight items familiar to two-year-olds (e.g., chairs, dogs, shoes) alongside puzzle pieces depicting the singular form of the objects. It was predicted that large set sizes of identical objects would increase children’s comprehension of plurality. The results establish that smaller set sizes, not similarity, boost children’s comprehension of the plural form.
Arias-TrejoN.Abreu-MendozaR. A.Aguado-ServínO. A. (2014). Spanish-speaking children’s production of number morphology. First Language, 34, 372–384.
2.
BarnerD.LuiT.ZapfJ. (2012). Is two a plural marker in early child language?Developmental Psychology, 48, 10–17. doi:10.1037/a0025283
3.
BerkoJ. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.
4.
BrownR.CazdenC.BellugiU. (1969). The child’s grammar from I to III. In HillJ. P. (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 28–73). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
CockingR. R. (1977). Measures of language comprehension: Relations to performance. Child Study Journal, 7, 165–178.
6.
CockingR. R.McHaleS. (1981). A comparative study of the use of pictures and objects in assessing children’s receptive and productive language. Journal of Child Language, 8, 1–13.
7.
DeaconS. H.Lalji-SamjiN.LeungD.WerkerJ. F. (2004, May). ‘More or less’: The specificity of 18- and 24-month old infants’ knowledge of the plural. Paper presented at the 14th Biennial International Conference of Infant Studies, Chicago, IL.
8.
EttlingerM.ZapfJ. A. (2011). The role of phonology in children’s acquisition of the plural. Language Acquisition, 18, 294–313.
9.
FensonL.DaleP. S.ReznickJ. S.ThalD.BatesE.HartungJ. P. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User’s guide and technical manual. San Diego, CA: Singular.
10.
FraserC.BellugiU.BrownR. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 2, 121–135. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80076-6
11.
HöhleB.vandeVijverR.WeissenbornJ. (2006). Word processing at 19 months and its relation to language performance at 30 months: A retrospective analysis of data from German learning children. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 8, 356–363. doi:10.1080/14417040600970614
12.
KouiderS.HalberdaJ.WoodJ.CareyS. (2006). Acquisition of English number marking: The singular-plural distinction. Language Learning and Development, 2, 1–25. doi:10.1207/s15473341lld0201_1
13.
NaiglesL. R. (2004). Comprehension matters: A commentary on ‘a multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition’. Journal of Child Language, 31, 936–940. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006403
14.
NationK.SnowlingM. J.ClarkeP. (2005). Production of the English past tense by children with language comprehension impairments. Journal of Child Language, 32, 117–137. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006555
15.
RoschE. H. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.
16.
SarneckaB. W.KamenskayaT. O.YamanaY.YudovinaJ. B. (2004). Language as lens: Plural marking and numeral learning in English, Japanese, and Russian. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
17.
SchaefferB.EgglestonV. H.ScottJ. L. (1974). Number development in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 57–379.
18.
TareM.ShatzM.GilbertsonL. (2008). Maternal uses of non-object terms in child-directed speech: color, number and time. First Language, 28, 87–100.
19.
ThelenE.SmithL. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
WinitzH.SandersR.KortJ. (1981). Comprehension and production of the /-ez/ plural allomorph. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 259–271. doi:10.1007/BF01067507
21.
WynnK. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36, 155–193.
22.
WynnK. (1992). Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 220–251. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90008-P
23.
ZapfJ. A. (2004). Frequency in the input and children’s mastery of the regular English plural. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.
24.
ZapfJ. A.SmithL. B. (2008). Meaning matters in children’s plural productions. Cognition, 108, 466–476. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.008
25.
ZapfJ. A.SmithL. B. (2010, March). The plural: What it means and when it matters. Presentation at the 17th Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Baltimore, MD.
