Narrative competence can be considered an indicator of children’s knowledge about other people’s minds. The present study investigates the relations between, on the one hand, children’s narrative competence and their second order language of mind (comprehension of deception) and, on the other, their developmental trends from kindergarten to primary school. Participants in the study included 142 Italian-speaking children (63 attending their last year in kindergarten and 79 attending first grade in primary school). Children were given a narrative task containing a deception. The ability to detect and comprehend deception increased significantly from kindergarten to primary school. Regression analyses showed that narrative competence influences the comprehension of deception. Findings confirm the importance of narratives as a research tool and the possibility to use mental language to assess different levels of theory of mind mastery.
AntoniettiA.Liverta-SempioO.MarchettiA. (Eds.). (2006). Theory of mind and language in developmental context. New York, NY: Springer.
2.
AntoniettiA.Liverta-SempioO.MarchettiA.AstingtonJ. (2006). Mental language and understanding of epistemic and emotion mental states. In AntoniettiA.Liverta-SempioO.MarchettiA. (Eds.), Theory of mind and language in developmental context (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Springer.
3.
AstingtonJ. W.PelletierJ. (1996). The language of mind: Its role in teaching and learning. In OlsonD. R.TorranceN. (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 593–619). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
4.
BartschK.EstesD. (1996). Individual differences in children’s developing theory of mind and implications for metacognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 281–304.
5.
BrethertonI.BeeghleyM. (1982). Talking about internal states: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 18, 906–921.
6.
BrunerJ. (1986). Acting minds: Possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
CamaioniL.LongobardiE. (1997). Referenze a stati mentali interni nella produzione linguistica spontanea a venti mesi [Reference to internal mental states in spontaneous speech production in children aged 20 months]. Età evolutiva, 56, 16–24.
8.
CameronC. A.HutchinsonJ. (2009). Telephone-mediated communication effects on young children’s oral and written narratives. First Language, 29, 347–371.
9.
ChandlerM.FritzA. S.HalaS. (1989). Smallscale deceit: Deception as a marker of two-, three- and four-year-olds’ theories of mind. Child Development, 60, 1263–1277.
10.
CharmanT.Shmueli-GoetzY. (1998). The relationship between theory of mind, language, and narrative discourse: An experimental study. Current Psychology of Cognition, 17, 245–271.
11.
DunnJ. (1994). Changing minds and changing relationships. In LewisC.MitchellP. (Eds.), Children’s early understanding of mind: Origins and development (pp. 297–310). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
FeldmanC. F.KalmarD. A. (1996). Some educational implications of genre-based mental models: The interpretive cognition of text understanding. In OlsonD. R.TorranceN. (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 434–460). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13.
FernándezC. (2013). Mindful storytellers: Emerging pragmatics and theory of mind development. First Language, 33, 20–46.
14.
FodorJ. A. (1992). A theory of the child’s theory of mind. Cognition, 44, 283–296.
15.
GarnerP. W.Carlson JonesD.GaddyG.RennieK. M. (1997). Low-income mother’s conversations about emotions and their children’s emotional competence. Social Development, 6, 37–52.
16.
GuajardoN. R.WatsonA. C. (2002). Narrative discourse and theory of mind development. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 305–325.
17.
HallidayM. A. K.HasanR. (1976). Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.
18.
HowardA. A.MayeuxL.NaiglesL. R. (2008). Conversational correlates of children’s acquisition of mental verbs and a theory of mind. First Language, 28, 375–402.
19.
HudsonJ. A.ShapiroL. R. (1991). Children’s scripts, stories and personal narratives. In McCabeA.PetersonC. (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp. 89–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
JenkinsJ. M.AstingtonJ. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 70–78.
21.
LecceL.ZocchiS.PagninA.PalladinoP.TaumoepeauM. (2010). Reading minds: The relation between children’s mental state knowledge and their metaknowledge about reading. Child Development, 81, 1876–1893.
22.
LeeK.CameronC. A.DoucetteJ.TalwarV. (2002). Phantoms and fabrications: Young children’s detection of implausible lies. Child Development, 73, 1688–1702.
23.
McKeoughA. (1992). A neo-structural analysis of children’s narrative and its development. In CaseR. (Ed.), The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thoughts and knowledge (pp. 171–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
MillerC. A. (2006). Developmental relationships between language and theory of mind. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 142–154.
25.
MilliganK.AstingtonJ. W.DackL. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622–646.
26.
MooreC.FurrowD. (1991). The development of the language of belief: The expression of relative certainty. In FryeD.MooreC. (Eds.), Children’s theory of mind (pp. 1–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
PernerJ. (2000). About + belief + counterfactual. In MitchellP.RiggsK. L. (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 367–401). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
28.
PintoG.BigozziL.Accorti GamannossiB.VezzaniC. (2009). Emergent literacy and learning to write: A predictive model for Italian language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXIV, 61–78.
29.
RuffmanT.SladeL.CroweE. (2002). The relation between children’s and mothers’ mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 734–751.
30.
ShapiroL. R.HudsonJ. A. (1997). Coherence and cohesion in children’s stories. In CostermansJ.FayolM. (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships. Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 23–48). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
ShatzM.WellmanH. M.SilberS. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the firs reference to mental state. Cognition, 14, 301–321.
32.
SladeL.RuffmanT. (2005). How language does (and does not) relate to theory of mind: A longitudinal study of syntax, semantics, working memory and false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 117–141.
33.
SodianB.TaylorC.HarrisP. L.PernerJ. (1991). Early deception and the child’s theory of mind: False trails and genuine markers. Child Development, 62, 468–483.
34.
SymonsD. K.PetersonC. C.SlaughterV.RocheJ.DoyleE. (2005). Theory of mind and mental state discourse during book reading and story-telling tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 81–102.
35.
TaumoepeauM.ReeseE. (2013). Maternal reminiscing, elaborative talk, and children’s theory of mind: An intervention study. First Language, 33, 388–410.
36.
WellmanH. M.CrossD.WatsonJ. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false-belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.
37.
WellmanH. M.LiuD. (2004). Scaling of theory of mind tasks. Child Development, 75, 523–541.
38.
WimmerH.PernerJ. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representations and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
