The ability to organize the referential content of narrative has usually been investigated as a mark of the development of discourse skills. In this study, the pragmatic use of pronominal and nominal forms of reference in written stories was considered instead as a mark of literacy development in deaf and hearing students. Participants in the study were 17 deaf high-school students, 17 school-age matched hearing controls, and 16 hearing second-graders (novice writers) who were asked to write a picture-story, Frog, Where are you?, for a hearing reader who was unacquainted with it. Results revealed that deaf students appear to use the same variety of referential devices as hearing students when writing and, in most cases, these devices are used appropriately. However, the referential strategies of the deaf students were more nominal and less anaphoric than those of their hearing peers. It is concluded that the referential strategies of deaf writers are only superficially similar to those of hearing novice writers, suggesting that deaf students' referential strategies in writing are not merely the product of a delay in development of discourse skills.
Albertini, J. (2000). Advances in literacy research and practice. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 123-125.
2.
Antia, S.D., Reed, S. & Kreimeyer, K.H. (2005). Written language of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in public schools. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 244-255.
3.
Arfé, B. (2006). La valutazione delle abilità di scrittura nei bambini sordi [The assessment of writing ability in deaf children]. In D. Fabbretti and E. Tomasuolo (Eds), Scrittura e Sordità [Writing and Deafness] (pp. 117-137). Roma: Carocci.
4.
Arfé, B. & Boscolo, P. (2006). Causal coherence in deaf and hearing students' written narratives. Discourse Processes, 42, 271-300.
5.
Bamberg, M. (1987). The acquisition of narratives. Learning to use language. Berlin: de Gruyter.
6.
Bartlett, E.J. (1984). Anaphoric reference in written narratives of good and poor elementary school writers. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 540-552.
7.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
8.
Berninger, V.W., Fuller, F. & Whitaker, D. (1993). A process model of writing development across life span. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 193-217.
9.
Berninger, V.W. & Swanson, L.H. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower's model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, 2, 57-81.
10.
Boscolo, P. (1990). The construction of expository text. First Language, 10, 217-230.
11.
De Villiers, P.A. & Pomerantz, S.B. (1992). Hearing-impaired students learning new words from written context. Applied Psycholinguistics , 13, 409-431.
12.
Emmorey, K. & Lillo-Martin, D. (1995). Processing spatial anaphora: Referent reactivation with overt and null pronouns in American Sign Language . Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 631-653.
13.
Fabbretti, D. (2000). L'italiano scritto dai sordi: Un'indagine sulle abilità di scrittura di sordi adulti segnanti nativi [Italian written by the deaf: An investigation of adult deaf signers' writing skills]. Rassegna di Psicologia, 17, 73-93.
14.
Fabbretti, D., Volterra, V. & Pontecorvo, C. (1998). Written language abilities in deaf Italians. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education , 3, 231-244.
15.
Fiestas, C. & Peña, E.D. (2004). Narrative discourse in bilingual children: Language and tasks effects. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 155-168.
16.
Gutierrez-Clellen, V.F. & Heinrichs-Ramos, L. (1993). Referential cohesion in the narratives of Spanish-speaking children: A developmental study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 559-567.
17.
Hickmann, M. & Hendriks, H. (1999). Cohesion and anaphora in children's narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Child Language, 26, 419-452.
18.
Hickmann, M., Kail, M. & Roland, F. (1995) Cohesive anaphoric relations in French children's narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language , 15, 277-300.
19.
Hunt, K.W. (1965). Grammatical structure written at three grade levels . Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, Research Report No. 3.
20.
Kail, M. & Hickmann, M. (1992). French children's ability to introduce references in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language , 12, 73-94.
21.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production. In W. Deutsch (Ed.), The child's construction of language. London: Academic Press.
23.
Liles, B., Duffy, R., Merritt, D. & Purcell, S. (1995). Measurement of narrative discourse ability in children with language disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 415-425.
24.
Marsharck, M., Mouradian, V. & Halas, M. (1994). Discourse rules in the language (production of deaf and hearing children). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 89-107.
25.
Mayer, C. (1999). Shaping at the point of utterance: An investigation of the composing processes of the deaf student writer. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 37-49.
26.
Mayer, C. & Akamatsu, C. (1999). Bilingual-bicultural models of literacy education for deaf students: Considering the claims. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 1-8.
27.
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you?New York : Dial Press.
28.
McAffe, M., Kelly, J.F. & Samar, V.J. (1990). Spoken and written errors of postsecondary students with severe hearing impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 55, 628-634.
29.
Millogo, V.E. (2005). The use of anaphoric pronouns by French children in narrative: Evidence from constrained text production. Journal of Child Language, 35, 439-461.
30.
Musselman C.R. & Szanto, G. (1998). The written language of deaf adolescents: Patterns of performance. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education , 3, 245-257.
31.
Orsolini, M., Rossi, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (1996). Re-introduction of referents in Italian children's narratives. Child Language, 23, 465-486.
32.
Paul, P. (1998). Reading vocabulary and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 3-15.
33.
Power, D. & Leigh, G. (2000). Principles and practices of literacy development for deaf learners: A historical overview. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 3-8.
34.
Raven, J.C. (1996). SPM, Standard Progressive Matrices. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
35.
Rustioni Metz-Lancaster, D. & Associazione "La nostra famiglia" (1994). Prove di valutazione della comprensione linguistica [Test for the assessment of linguistic comprehension]. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
36.
Schirmer, B.R. (2001). Using research to improve literacy practice and practice to improve literacy research. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 83-91.
37.
Scott, C.M. (1988). Spoken and written syntax. In M. A. Nippold (Ed.), Lateral language development. Ages 9 through 19 (pp. 49-95). Boston: College Hill Press.
38.
Shapiro, L.R. & Hudson, J.A. (1991). Tell me a make-believe story: Coherence and cohesion in young children's picture elicited narratives. Developmental Psychology, 27, 960-974.
39.
Shapiro, L. & Hudson, J. (1997). Coherence and cohesion in children's stories. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds), Processing interclausal relationship. Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 23-49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40.
Simone, R. (1990). Fondamenti di linguistica [Fundamentals of linguistics] . Bari: Editori Laterza.
41.
Singleton, J.L., Morgan, D., DiGello, E., Wiles, J. & Rivers, R. (2004). Vocabulary use by low, moderate, and high ASL-proficient writers compared to hearing ESL and monolingual speakers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 86-103.
42.
Spencer, L.J., Barker, B.A. & Tomblin, J.B. (2003). Exploring the language and literacy outcomes of pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 24, 236-247.
43.
Wigglesworth, G. (1990) Children's narrative acquisition: A study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First Language, 10, 105-125.
44.
Wigglesworth, G. (1991). Reference tracking strategies of young children in extended narrative discourse. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 119-137.
45.
Wigglesworth, G. (1997). Children's individual approaches to the organization of narrative. Child Language, 24, 279-309.
46.
Wilbur, R.B. (1977). An explanation of deaf children's difficulty with certain syntactic structures in English. The Volta Review , 79, 85-92.
47.
Wilbur, R.B. (2000). The use of ASL to support the development of English and literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 81-104.
48.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C. & Downey, D. (1992). When a story is not a story: A process analysis of the written language of hearing-impaired children. The Volta Review, 94, 131-158.
49.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C. & Downey, D. (1996). The effect of the hearing loss on the development of metacognitive strategies in written language. The Volta Review, 98, 97-143.
50.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Snyder, L.S. & Mayberry, R. (1996). How deaf and normally hearing students convey meaning within and between written sentences. The Volta Review , 98, 9-38.
