An experiment with 64 twelve-month-olds investigated the influence of object naming
on their formation of novel object categories. Stimuli were constructed to represent
2 broad categories consisting of 3 narrow categories each. Objects representing the
same narrow or broad category were presented with either a labelling or
non-labelling phrase in a modified word extension procedure. Only infants in the
narrow category-level condition who heard labelling phrases demonstrated
categorization, and categorization performance in the narrow label condition was
superior to that in the narrow no-label condition. Consistent with studies utilizing
conventional objects, results indicate that object naming can facilitate infants'
formation of novel object categories early in the process of lexical acquisition.
Balaban, M. T.
&
Waxman, S. R.
(1997).
Do words facilitate object categorization in 9-month-old infants?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64,
3–26
.
2.
Behl-Chada, G.
(1996).
Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy
. Cognition, 60,
105–141
.
3.
Booth, A. E.
&
Waxman, S. R.
(2002).
Object names and object functions serve as cues to categories for infants
. Developmental Psychology, 38,
948–957
.
4.
Campbell, A. L.
&
Namy, L. L.
(2003).
The role of social-referential context in verbal and nonverbal symbol learning
. Child Development, 74,
549–563
.
5.
Eimas, P. D.
,
Quinn, P. C.
&
Cowan, P.
(1994).
Development of exclusivity in perceptually-based categories of young infants
. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58,
418–431
.
6.
Fenson, L.
,
Dale, P. S.
,
Reznick, J. S.
,
Bates, E.
,
Thal, D. J.
&
Pethick, S. J.
(1994).
Variability in early communicative development
. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,
52 (5, Serial No. 242).
7.
Fulkerson, A. L. (1997). New words for new things: The relationship between
novel labels and twelve-month-oldś categorization of novel objects.
Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.
8.
Fulkerson, A. L.
&
Haaf, R. A.
(2003).
The influence of labels, non-labeling sounds, and source of eauditory input
on 9-and 15-month-oldś object categorization
. Infancy, 4,
349–369
.
9.
Fulkerson, A. L.
&
Haaf, R. A.
(2004, May).
Auditory source influences the effect of object naming on
9-month-oldś object categorization
. Paper presented in a symposium entitled “The
conceptual power of naming: Categorization, individuation, and inductive
inference” at the International Conference on Infant Studies,
Chicago, IL, organized by S. R. Waxman.
10.
Fulkerson, A. L.
,
Waxman, S. R.
&
Seymour, J. M.
(2006).
Linking object names and object categories: Words (but not tones)
facilitate object categorization in 6-and 12-month-olds
. Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on
Language Development [Electronic supplement]. Retrieved from: http://www.bu.edu/linguistics/APPLIED/BUCLD/proc.html.
11.
Houston-Price, C.
,
Plunkett, K.
&
Harris, P.
(2005).
Word-learning wizardry at 1;6
. Language, 32,
175–189
.
12.
Mandler, J. M.
&
Bauer, P. J.
(1988).
The cradle of categorization: Is the basic level basic?Development, 3,
247–264
.
13.
Mandler, J. M.
,
Bauer, P. J.
&
McDonough, L.
(1991). Separating the sheep from the goats: Differentiating
global categories. 263–298.
14.
Mandler, J. M.
&
McDonough, L.
(1993). Concept formation in infancy. 8,
291–318
.
15.
Markman, E. M.
&
Hutchinson, J. E.
(1984). Children's sensitivity to constraints on
word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. 1–27.
16.
Mervis, C. B.
&
Crisafi, M. A.
(1982). Order of acquisition of subordinate-, basic-, and
superordinate-level categories. 258–266.
17.
Oakes, L. M.
&
Spalding, T. L.
(1997). The role of exemplar distribution in
infantś differentiation of categories. 457–475.
18.
Quinn, P. C.
&
Eimas, P. D.
(1996). Perceptual cues that permit categorical
differentiation of animal species by infants, 189–211.
19.
Quinn, P. C.
,
Eimas, P. D.
&
Rosenkrantz, S. L.
(1993).
Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by
3-month-old and 4-month-old infants
. Perception, 22,
463–475
.
20.
Rakison, D. H.
(2000).
When a rose is just a rose: The illusion of taxonomies in infant categorization
. Infancy, 1,
77–90
.
21.
Rosch, E.
,
Mervis, C. B.
,
Gray, W. D.
,
Johnson, D. M.
&
Boyes-Braem, P.
(1976).
Basic objects in natural categories
. Cognitive Psychology, 8,
382–439
.
22.
Ross, G. S.
(1980).
Categorization in 1-to 2-year-olds
. Developmental Psychology, 16,
391–396
.
23.
Ruff, H. A.
(1986).
Components of attention during infantś manipulative exploration
. Child Development, 57,
105–114
.
24.
Shi, R.
&
Werker, J. F.
(2001).
Six-month-old infantś preference for lexical words
. Psychological Science, 12,
70–75
.
25.
Shi, R.
,
Werker, J. F.
&
Morgan, J. L.
(1999).
Newborn infantś sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and
grammatical words
. Cognition, 72,
B11–B21
.
26.
Waxman, S. R.
(2002). Early word learning and conceptual development:
Everything had a name, and each name gave birth to a new thought. In
U. Goswami, U.
(Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp.
102–126).
Oxford: Blackwell
.
27.
Waxman, S. R.
&
Booth, A.
(2001).
Seeing pink elephants: Fourteen-month-oldś interpretations of
novel nouns and adjectives
. Cognitive Psychology, 43,
217–242
.
28.
Waxman, S. R.
&
Braun, I.
(2005).
Consistent (but not variable) names as invitations to form object
categories: New evidence from 12-month-old infants
. Cognition, 95,
B59–B68
.
29.
Waxman, S. R.
&
Hall, D. G.
(1993).
The development of a linkage between count nouns and object categories:
Evidence from fifteen-to twenty-one-month-old infants
. Child Development, 64,
1224–1241
.
30.
Waxman, S. R.
&
Markow, D. B.
(1995).
Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12-to 13-month-old infants
. Cognitive Psychology, 29,
257–302
.
31.
Woodward, A. L.
&
Hoyne, K. L.
(1999).
Infantś learning about words and sounds in relation to objects
. Child Development, 70,
65–77
.
