This study examines the phonological form of ten Finnish-speaking children's productive vocabulary in the period of transition into speech, with primary focus on the number of syllables in a word. The results showed that Finnish children produced relatively few monosyllables and a large number of disyllables in their early words. This seemed to reflect the predominance of disyllabic target words over monosyllabic ones in Finnish. Furthermore, it appeared that the reduction of disyllabic words was very uncommon, whereas polysyllabic words were considerably more often deformed. Finally, the polysyllabic words were quite often truncated in such a way that they fitted a trochaic pattern, which may partly be due to the fact that primary word stress in Finnish falls on the first syllable. Additionally, the segmental content of the target word and the use of a favourite template may have an effect on the selection of syllables. Thus, the present results suggest that the target language affects the syllabicity of children's early word productions and that differences in the linguistic features of the input may influence the strategies that children use when producing their first words.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenG. D.HawkinsS. (1980). Phonological rhythm: definition and development. in Yeni-KomshianG.KavanaghJ.FergusonC. (eds), Child Phonology, Vol. 1 (New York: Academic Press), 227–56.
2.
Boysson-BardiesB. deVihmanM. M.Roug-HellichiusL.DurandC.LandbergI.AraoF. (1992). Material evidence of infant selection from the target language: a cross-linguistic phonetic study. in FergusonC. A.MennL.Stoel-GammonC. (eds), Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications (Timonium, MD: York Press), 369–91.
3.
CrystalD. (1997). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language, 2nd edn (New York: Cambridge University Press).
4.
DemuthK. (1996). The prosodic structure of early words. in MorganJ.DemuthK. (eds), From Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press), 171–84.
5.
DemuthK.FeeE. J. (1995). Minimal prosodic words in early phonological development. Unpublished paper, Brown University & Dalhousie University, Canada.
6.
EcholsC. (1993). A perceptually-based model of children's earliest productions. Cognition, 46, 245–96.
7.
EcholsC.NewportE. (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition, 2, 189–220.
8.
FeeJ.IngramD. (1982). Reduplication as a strategy of phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 9, 41–54.
9.
FikkertP. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
10.
GardnerM.AltmanD. (1989). Estimation rather than hypothesis testing: confidence intervals rather than P values. in GardnerM.AltmanD. (eds), Statistics with Confidence (London: British Medical Journal), 6–19.
11.
GerkenL. (1994). A metrical template account of children's weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21, 565–84.
12.
IivonenA. (1998). Intonation in Finnish. in HirstD.Di CristoA. (eds), Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages (Cambridge: University Press), 311–27.
13.
IngramD. (1977). Phonological Disability in Children (London: Edward Arnold).
14.
JakobsonR. (1968). Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals (The Hague: Mouton).
15.
JohnsonJ. S.LewisL. B.HoganJ. C. (1997). A production limitation in syllable number: a longitudinal study of one child's early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 24, 327–49.
16.
KehoeM.Stoel-GammonC. (1997 a). Truncation patterns in English-speaking children's word productions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 526–41.
17.
KehoeM.Stoel-GammonC. (1997 b). The acquisition of prosodic structure: an investigation of current accounts of children's prosodic development. Language, 73, 113–44.
18.
KleinH. (1981). Productive strategies for the pronunciation of early polysyllabic lexical items. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 24, 389–405.
19.
KunnariS.NakaiS.VihmanM. M. (2001). Cross-linguistic evidence for acquisition of geminates. Psychology of Language and Communication, 5, 13–24.
20.
LaaloK. (1994). Kaksitavuvaihe lapsen kielen kehityksessä [The two-syllable stage in language acquisition]. Virittäjä, 98, 430–48.
21.
McGregorK. K.JohnsonA. C. (1997). Trochaic template use in early words and phrases. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 1220–31.
22.
McGregorK. K.LeonardL. B. (1994). Subject pronoun and article omissions in the speech of children with specific language impairment: a phonological interpretation. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 37, 171–81.
23.
National Board of Health (1990). Lastenneuvolaopas [Guide to child welfare clinics] (Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus).
24.
RichardsonU. (1998). Familial Dyslexia and Sound Duration in the Quantity Distinctions of Finnish Infants and Adults (Jyväskylä: Studia Philologica Jyväskyläensia, University of Jyväskylä).
25.
Savinainen-MakkonenT. (1998). Ensisanojen kauden fonologiaa: tapaustutkimus [Phonology at the first-words stage: a case study]. in KarjalainenM. (ed.), Kielen ituja (Oulu: Suomen ja saamen kielen ja logopedian laitoksen julkaisuja, 10, University of Oulu), 44–83.
26.
Savinainen-MakkonenT. (2000 a). Word-initial consonant omissions – a developmental process in children learning Finnish. First Language, 20, 161–85.
27.
Savinainen-MakkonenT. (2000 b). Learning long words – a typological perspective. Language and Speech, 43, 205–25.
28.
ToivainenJ. (1994). Mistä lapsi aloittaa kielensä opettelun? Lingvistisiä lähtökohtia [Which linguistic units does the Finnish child begin with?]. Publication of the Finnish Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 14, 73–80.
29.
VellemanS. (1998). Making Phonology Functional: What do I do First? (Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann).
30.
VihmanM. M. (1980). Sound change and child language. in TraugottE. C.LabrumR.ShepardS. (eds), Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Historical Linguistics (Amsterdam: John Benjamins B. V.), 303–20.
31.
VihmanM. M. (1993). Variable paths to early word production. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 61–82.
32.
VihmanM. M. (1996). Phonological Development: The Origins of Language in the Child (Oxford: Blackwell).
33.
VihmanM. M.DePaolisR. A.DavisB. L. (1998). Is there a ‘trochaic bias’ in early word learning? Evidence from infant production in English and French. Child Development, 69, 933–47.
34.
VihmanM. M.KayE.Boysson-BardiesB.DurandC.SundbergU. (1994). External sources of individual differences? A cross-linguistic analysis of the phonetics of mothers' speech to 1-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 30, 651–62.
35.
VihmanM. M.McCuneL. (1994). When is a word a word?Journal of Child Language, 21, 517–42.
36.
VihmanM. M.MillerR. (1988). Words and babble at the threshold of language acquisition. in SmithM. D.LockeJ. L. (eds), The Emergent Lexicon: The Child's Development of a Linguistic Vocabulary (New York: Academic Press). 151–83.
37.
WijnenRKrikhaarE.Den OsE. (1994). The (non)realization of unstressed elements in children's utterances: evidence for a rhythmic constraint. Journal of Child Language, 21, 59–83.
