This paper investigates a novel electric vehicle (EV) propulsion system utilizing a single five-leg inverter (FLI) to control two permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) for improved stability and efficiency. To achieve this, an electric differential (ED) algorithm is implemented within the control scheme. The system employs space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM) and field-oriented control (FOC) with a merging algorithm to optimize switching sequences for the FLI. The effectiveness of the proposed system is evaluated through comprehensive simulation studies, analyzing speed, torque, and current control. The simulation results demonstrate significant improvements in system stability and robustness compared to conventional two-inverter approaches. This research suggests the feasibility of a single FLI architecture for powering dual motors in EVs while maintaining exceptional stability and control performance.
ÇelikISonugurG (2022) The test of electric vehicle with electronic differential system in different road conditions. Politeknik Dergisi25(3): 1021–1030. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.873068
2.
ChakrabortyPParkerRHoqueT, et al. (2022) Addressing the range anxiety of battery electric vehicles with charging en route. Scientific Reports12(1): 5588. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08942-2
3.
ChenCXiaoXSunQ, et al. (2020) Predictive control of five-leg inverter-double permanent magnet synchronous motor system with error feedback model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1650(2): 022091. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1650/2/022091
4.
ChenYDongZSongZ, et al. (2024a) Predictive control of five-leg inverter driving dual PMSMs for overcurrent suppression. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications60(5): 6949–6958. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2024.3420821
5.
ChenYLiuCLiuS, et al. (2024b) Predictive control scheme with adaptive overmodulation for a five-leg VSI driving dual PMSMs. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics71(1): 71–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2023.3245221
6.
DujicDJonesMSlobodanN, et al. (2009) A general PWM method for a $(2n + 1)$ -leg inverter supplying $n$ three-phase machines. Industrial Electronics IEEE Transactions on56: 4107–4118. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2014909
7.
EhsaniMSinghKVBansalHO, et al. (2021) State of the art and trends in electric and hybrid electric vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE109(6): 967–984. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2021.3072788
8.
FrikhaMACroonenJDeepakK, et al. (2023) Multiphase motors and drive systems for electric vehicle powertrains: State of the art analysis and future trends. Energies16(2): 768. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020768
9.
GengQLiZJuY, et al. (2022) An improved PWM method of Five-Leg VSI fed dual-PMSM system with duty cycles regulation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics27(6): 5771–5779. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2022.3190690
10.
Ghaderi TalkhabSAsadR (2023) Reviewing and comparing different algorithms and topologies to control the speed of multi electric train motors by a drive system. International Journal of Railway Research10(1): 45–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22068/ijrare.324
11.
HagemCKverndokkSNævdalE, et al. (2023) Policies for electrification of cars in the short and long run. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment117: 103606. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103606
12.
HarishSPSridharSIndelaO, et al. (2021) Analysis of five leg voltage source inverter fed dual motor drive system. ES3 Web of Conferences (ed. STummala) 309: 01142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130901142
13.
HartaniKMiloudYMiloudiA, et al. (n.d.) Electric vehicle stability with rear electronic differential traction.
14.
HuYZhuZQWuZ (2021) Modelling and vector control of dual three-phase PMSM with one-phase open. IET Electric Power Applications15(7): 847–860. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1049/elp2.12064
15.
IbrahimZLaziJMSulaimanM (2012a) Independent speed sensorless control of dual parallel PMSM based on Five-Leg Inverter. In: International Multi-conference on Systems Signals & Devices. IEEE, pp. 1–6. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6198021/ (accessed 29 November 2023).
16.
IbrahimZYaakopNYMSulaimanM, et al. (2012b) Electric differential with SVPWM direct torque control using five-leg inverter for electric vehicles. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology46: 599–609.
17.
JingGZhouC (2020) Control strategy for a five-leg inverter supplying dual three-phase PMSM. IEEE Access 8: 174480–174488. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025392
18.
KondratenkoDLewickiA (2023) A simplified SVPWM technique for five-leg inverter with dual three-phase output. In: 2023 3rd International Conference on Electrical Computer Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME). 2023 3rd International Conference on Electrical Computer Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME), pp. 1–6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCME57830.2023.10252832
19.
LaziJMIbrahimZSulaimanM, et al. (2015) Independent control for dual-PMSM drives using Five-Leg Inverter. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Energy Conversion (CENCON). 2015 IEEE Conference on Energy Conversion (CENCON), pp. 143–148. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/CENCON.2015.7409529
20.
LeviEVukosavicSNDujicD, et al. (2008) Five-leg inverter PWM technique for reduced switch count two-motor constant power applications. IET Electric Power Applications2(5): 275–287. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa:20070497
21.
LIMCSRahimNAHewWP, et al. (2013) Model predictive control of a two-motor drive with five-leg-inverter supply. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics60: 54–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2012.2186770
22.
MeiYFengS (2016) An optimized modulation method for a five-leg-inverter for dual Induction motor drives. In: 2016 IEEE 8th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC-ECCE Asia). 2016 IEEE 8th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC-ECCE Asia), pp. 660–663. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/IPEMC.2016.7512363
23.
NjehATrabelsiH (2015) Design of PMSMs topologies based on FEA for In-Wheel motor hybrid propulsion application. In: 2015 IEEE 12th International Multi-Conference on Systems Signals & Devices (SSD15). 2015 IEEE 12th International Multi-Conference on Systems Signals & Devices (SSD15), pp. 1–5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2015.7348144
24.
OkaKNozawaYOmataR, et al. (2007) Characteristic comparison between five-leg inverter and nine-switch inverter. In: 2007 Power Conversion Conference—Nagoya. 2007 Power Conversion Conference, Nagoya, pp. 279–283. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCON.2007.372981
25.
PillayPKrishnanR (1989) Modeling, simulation, and analysis of permanent-magnet motor drives. I. The permanent-magnet synchronous motor drive. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications25(2): 265–273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/28.25541
26.
SabaradJKulkarniGH (2020) Novel switching technique for five leg inverter in dual motor control. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science19: 644. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v19.i2.pp644-651
27.
TahaWAzerPCallegaroetAD, et al. (2022) Multiphase traction inverters: State-of-the-art review and future trends. IEEE Access10: 4580–4599. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3141542
28.
VukosavicSJonesMDujicD, et al. (2008) An improved PWM method for a five-leg inverter supplying two three-phase motors, pp. 160–165. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2008.4676881
29.
ZhangYZhaoCDaiB, et al. (2022) Dynamic simulation of permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) electric vehicle based on simulink. Energies15(3): 1134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031134
