This study addresses the bi-level multi-objective optimization problems raised in reliability-based robust design optimization (RBRDO) of engineering applications through establishing a state-of-the-art game theoretic scenario. A novel bi-level decentralized decision-making approach is proposed using the synergy of RBRDO, game theory, Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), and genetic programming (GP). The application of the proposed approach is elaborated in a case study of robust synthesis of high-speed path-generating four-bar mechanisms. The four performance criteria, namely, accuracy (TE), robustness (TE and 2TE), reliability (fG) at the upper level, and quality of motion (TA) at the lower level are assigned to four players so that each of whom is in charge of one objective criterion. The peak input driving torque (TS) is associated with the upper-level problem. The GP meta-model is used to capture the Stackelberg protocol that is, constructing the follower’s rational reaction set (RRS) and the Nash bargaining function is hired to model the cooperative behavior. The obtained results show a considerable enhancement in reliability and robust behavior of mechanism, while the deterministic criteria of accuracy and quality of motion are preserved.
AcharyyaSKMandalM (2009) Performance of EAs for four-bar linkage synthesis. Mechanism and Machine Theory44(9): 1784–1794.
2.
AhmadiBAhmadiBNezamivandS (2023) An analytical game-based design of crank-rocker mechanisms with optimum stroke, time ratio and transmission angle. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science237(10): 2306–2315.
3.
AhmadiBAhmadiBCheginiSN, et al. (2021) Multi-objective reliability-based optimal synthesis of path generating four-bar mechanisms: A cooperative game theoretic approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science236: 2298–2311.
4.
AhmadiBNariman-ZadehNJamaliA (2017) Path synthesis of four-bar mechanisms using synergy of polynomial neural network and Stackelberg game theory. Engineering Optimization49(6): 932–947.
5.
AhmadiBNariman-ZadehNJamaliA (2019) A Stackelberg game theoretic multi-objective synthesis of four-bar mechanisms. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization60(2): 699–710.
6.
Ashraf TaleshSNariman-ZadehNJamaliA (2022) Multi-objective parametric design of PI/PID controllers via multi-level game-theoretic optimization for systems with time delay. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control44(13): 2532–2544.
7.
BureeratSSleesongsomS (2021) Constraint handling technique for four-bar linkage path generation using self-adaptive teaching–Learning-based optimization with a diversity archive. Engineering Optimization53(3): 513–530.
8.
CabreraJAOrtizANadalF, et al. (2011) An evolutionary algorithm for path synthesis of mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory46(2): 127–141.
9.
CabreraJASimonAPradoM (2002) Optimal synthesis of mechanisms with genetic algorithms. Mechanism and Machine Theory37(10): 1165–1177.
10.
ChenM-FTzengG-HTangT-I (2005) Fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of expatriate assignments. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making4(2): 277–296.
11.
ChenWAllenJKTsuiK-L, et al. (1996) A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. Journal of Mechanical Design: Transactions of the ASME118: 478–485.
12.
EbrahimiSPayvandyP (2015) Efficient constrained synthesis of path generating four-bar mechanisms based on the heuristic optimization algorithms. Mechanism and Machine Theory85: 189–204.
13.
EhrgottMGandibleuxX (2003) Multiple objective combinatorial optimization—A tutorial. In: TaninoTTanakaTInuiguchiM (eds) Multi-Objective Programming and Goal Programming. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 3–18.
14.
EqraNAbiriAHVatankhahR (2018) Optimal synthesis of a four-bar linkage for path generation using adaptive PSO. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering40(9): 469.
15.
GhotbiE (2016) Multi-objective optimization of mechanism design using a bi-level game theoretic formulation. Concurrent Engineering24(3): 266–274.
16.
HajilooANariman-ZadehNMoeiniA (2008) Pareto optimum design of robust controllers for systems with parametric uncertainties. In: PecherkovaPFlidrMDunikJ (eds) Robotics, Automation and Control, vol. 12. Vienna: I-Tech, pp. 205–226.
17.
HernandezGMistreeF (2000) Integrating product design and manufacturing: A game theoretic approach. Engineering Optimization32(6): 749–775.
18.
HobbsBFMetzlerCBPangJ-S (2000) Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: An MPEC approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems15(2): 638–645.
19.
JamaliAAhmadiBGhamatiM, et al. (2015) Reliability-based optimal controller design for systems with probabilistic uncertain parameters using fuzzy limit state function. Journal of Vibration and Control21(7): 1413–1429.
20.
JamaliAGhamatiMAhmadiB, et al. (2013) Probability of failure for uncertain control systems using neural networks and multi-objective uniform-diversity genetic algorithms (MUGA). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence26(2): 714–723.
21.
JamaliAKhaleghiEGholaminezhadI, et al. (2016) Modelling and prediction of complex non-linear processes by using Pareto multi-objective genetic programming. International Journal of Systems Science47(7): 1675–1688.
22.
KhorshidiMSoheilypourMPeyroM, et al. (2011) Optimal design of four-bar mechanisms using a hybrid multi-objective GA with adaptive local search. Mechanism and Machine Theory46(10): 1453–1465.
23.
KunjurAKrishnamurtyS (1997) Genetic algorithms in mechanism synthesis. Journal of Applied Mechanisms and Robotics4(2): 18–24.
24.
LaribiMAMlikaARomdhaneL, et al. (2004) A combined genetic algorithm–Fuzzy logic method (GA–FL) in mechanisms synthesis. Mechanism and Machine Theory39(7): 717–735.
25.
LiJYuJWangQ, et al. (2022) Differentiable bilevel programming for Stackelberg congestion games. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07618
26.
LinW-Y (2010) A GA–DE hybrid evolutionary algorithm for path synthesis of four-bar linkage. Mechanism and Machine Theory45(8): 1096–1107.
27.
LiuSZhuM (2022) Distributed inverse constrained reinforcement learning for multi-agent systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35: 33444–33456.
28.
McDougallRNoklebyS (2010) Grashof mechanism synthesis using multi-objective parallel asynchronous particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Society for mechanical engineering forum (CSME FORUM 2010), Victoria, BC, Canada, 7–9 June.
29.
MarlerRTAroraJS (2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization26(6): 369–395.
30.
MatekarSFulambarkarA (2021) Robust design of deterministically synthesized four-bar mechanism. In: NarasimhamGSVLBabuAVReddySS, et al (eds) Recent Trends in Mechanical Engineering. Singapore: Springer, pp. 397–405.
31.
MottaRdSAfonsoSM (2016) An efficient procedure for structural reliability-based robust design optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization54(3): 511–530.
32.
Naebi ToutounchiASeyed ShenavaS-JTaheriSS, et al. (2018) MPEC approach for solving preventive maintenance scheduling of power units in a market environment. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(2): 436–445.
33.
Nariman-ZadehNFeleziMJamaliA, et al. (2009) Pareto optimal synthesis of four-bar mechanisms for path generation. Mechanism and Machine Theory44(1): 180–191.
34.
PickardJKCarreteroJAMerletJ-P (2020) Appropriate synthesis of the four-bar linkage. Mechanism and Machine Theory153: 103965.
35.
RostonGPSturgesRH (1996) Genetic algorithm synthesis of four-bar mechanisms. AI EDEM: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing10(5): 371–390.
36.
SchuëllerGIJensenHA (2008) Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties —An overview. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering198(1): 2–13.
37.
SmailiADiabN (2007) Optimum synthesis of hybrid-task mechanisms using ant-gradient search method. Mechanism and Machine Theory42(1): 115–130.
38.
StarostaR (2008) Application of genetic algorithm and Fourier coefficients (GA-FC) in mechanism synthesis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics46: 395–411.
39.
WenU-PHsuS-T (1991) Linear bi—level programming problems—A review. Journal of the Operational Research Society42(2): 125–133.
40.
YangMWangY-LZengD, et al. (2020) Game theoretic-based optimal load frequency control of power systems with network-induced delays. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control42(1): 22–30.
41.
YuHDangCWangS-Y (2006) Game theoretical analysis of buy-it-now price auctions. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making5(3): 557–581.
42.
ZhouHCheungEHM (2001) Optimal synthesis of crank–Rocker linkages for path generation using the orientation structural error of the fixed link. Mechanism and Machine Theory36(8): 973–982.
