High observer gain is the key to ensuring the full-order active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) performance for electro-hydraulic servo (EHS) systems. However, the noise sensitivity and output time delay limit the observer gain. In this paper, a lower-order linear ADRC is proposed with lower gain and uncompromised disturbance rejection ability. First, the internal nonlinear dynamics and external unknown disturbances of the EHS system are eliminated by introducing the structural invariance compensation (SIC). Then, the original EHS model is transformed into a one-order integral chain structure. A one-order linear ADRC, solving the compensation error of SIC caused by model parameter uncertainty, could be directly developed based on the equivalent model. In addition, a practical and novel b0 tuning method and frequency-domain stability analysis technology are developed. Extensive comparative experiments are carried out to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
AhmadSAliA (2021) On active disturbance rejection control in presence of measurement noise. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics69(11): 11600–11610.
2.
CaoYZhaoQYeY, et al. (2020) ADRC-based current control for grid-tied inverters: Design, analysis, and verification. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics67(10): 8428–8437.
3.
ChenSBaiWHuY, et al. (2020) On the conceptualization of total disturbance and its profound implications. Science China (Information Sciences)63(2): 221–223.
4.
DengHLuoJDuanX, et al. (2017) Adaptive inverse control for gripper rotating system in heavy-duty manipulators with unknown dead zones. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(10): 7952–7961.
5.
DengWYaoJMaD (2017) Robust adaptive precision motion control of hydraulic actuators with valve dead-zone compensation. ISA Transactions70: 269–278.
6.
DengWYaoJJiaoZ, et al. (2022) High dynamic output feedback robust control of hydraulic flight motion simulator using a novel cascaded extended state observer. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics35(7): 300–309.
7.
FengHQiaoWYinC, et al. (2019) Identification and compensation of nonlinear friction for an electrohydraulic system. Mechanism and Machine Theory141: 1–13.
8.
FengHYinCCaoD (2023) Trajectory tracking of an electro-hydraulic servo system with a new friction model-based compensation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics28(1): 473–482.
9.
GaoZ (2003) Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning. In: Proceedings—IEEE 2003 American control conference, Denver, CO, 4–6 June, pp. 4989–4996. New York: IEEE.
10.
GuoYZhangZLiuQ, et al. (2021) Decoupling-based adaptive sliding-mode synchro-position control for a dual-cylinder driven hydraulic support with different pipelines. ISA Transactions123: 357–371.
11.
HanJ (2009) Form PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics56(3): 900–906.
12.
HuangCZhaoH (2023) Error-based active disturbance rejection control for wind turbine output power regulation. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy14(3): 1692–1701.
13.
HuangYXueW (2014) Active disturbance rejection control: Methodology and theoretical analysis. ISA Transactions53(4): 963–976.
14.
IzciD (2021) Design and application of an optimally tuned PID controller for DC motor speed regulation via a novel hybrid Lévy flight distribution and Nelder–Mead algorithm. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control43(14): 3195–3211.
15.
JiYZhangJHeC (2023) Wheel braking pressure control based on central booster electrohydraulic brake-by-wire system. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification9(1): 222–235.
16.
JinHGaoZ (2023) On the notions of normality, locality, and operational stability in ADRC. Control Theory and Technology21(1): 97–109.
17.
LinYShiYBurtonR (2013) Modeling and robust discrete-time sliding-mode control design for a fluid power electrohydraulic actuator (EHA) system. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics18(1): 1–10.
18.
LuSJiangYXuX, et al. (2024) Adaptive heading control strategy for unmanned ground vehicle with variable wheelbase based on robust-active disturbance rejection control. Control Engineering Practice142: 105786.
19.
MadonskiRHerbstGStankovicM (2023) ADRC in output and error form: Connection, equivalence, performance. Control Theory and Technology21(1): 56–71.
20.
MohantyAYaoB (2011) Integrated direct/indirect adaptive robust control of hydraulic manipulators with valve deadband. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics16(4): 707–715.
21.
NaJLiYHuangY, et al. (2019) Output feedback control of uncertain hydraulic servo systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics67(1): 490–500.
22.
ShenWPanJ (2023) Angle tracking control of integrated hydraulic transformer inner loop servo system. ISA Transactions134: 312–321.
23.
TianMWangBYuY, et al. (2024) Adaptive active disturbance rejection control for uncertain current ripples suppression of PMSM drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics71(3): 2320–2331.
24.
WangCQuanLZhangS, et al. (2017) Reduced-order model based active disturbance rejection control of hydraulic servo system with singular value perturbation theory. ISA Transactions67: 455–465.
25.
WangLZhaoDZhangZ, et al. (2021) Model-free linear active disturbance rejection output feedback control for electro-hydraulic proportional system with unknown dead-zone. IET Control Theory and Applications15(16): 2081–2094.
26.
WangMLiHGaoY, et al. (2023) Active disturbance rejection decoupling control for independent-metering electro-hydraulic system with online compensation information. IEEE Access11: 121539–121555.
27.
WosPDindorfR (2013) Adaptive control of the electro-hydraulic servo-system with external disturbances. Asian Journal of Control15(4): 1065–1080.
28.
WratGBholaMRanjanP, et al. (2020) Energy saving and fuzzy-PID position control of electro-hydraulic system by leakage compensation through proportional flow control valve. ISA Transactions101: 269–280.
29.
XuZDengWShenH, et al. (2022) Extended-state-observer-based adaptive prescribed performance control for hydraulic systems with full-state constraints. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics27(6): 5615–5625.
30.
YanZDengSYangZ, et al. (2023) An ADRC strategy with sequential output stacking extended state observers to evaluate hydraulic torque for a continuous-wave pulse generator. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics20(3): 4259–4270.
31.
YangGYaoJ (2020) Nonlinear adaptive output feedback robust control of hydraulic actuators with largely unknown modeling uncertainties. Applied Mathematical Modelling79: 824–842.
32.
YaoBBuFReedyJ, et al. (2000) Adaptive robust motion control of single-rod hydraulic actuators: Theory and experiments. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics5(1): 79–91.
33.
YaoZLiangXZhaoQ, et al. (2022) Adaptive disturbance observer-based control of hydraulic systems with asymptotic stability. Applied Mathematical Modelling105: 226–242.
34.
ZhangZGuoYGongD, et al. (2022) Hybrid extended state observer-based integral sliding mode control of the propulsion for a hydraulic roofbolter. Control Engineering Practice126: 105260.
35.
ZhengJZhaoSWeiS (2009) Application of self-tuning fuzzy PID controller for an SRM direct drive volume control hydraulic press. Control Engineering Practice17(12): 1398–1404.
36.
ZhuangHSunQChenZ (2021) Sliding mode control for electro-hydraulic proportional directional valve-controlled position tracking system based on an extended state observer. Asian Journal of Control23(4): 1855–1869.
