To improve the following performance in large curve path and time-varying drift angle, a reduced-order extended state observer is added to the Improved Stanley Guidance Law (EISGL). Combining with the dynamic surface control (DSC), an adaptive auxiliary system is simultaneously built to compensate for the effect of the state constraints on the system. A barrier Lyapunov function combined with a prescribed performance function is designed to constrain the heading angle error of path following. Adaptive laws are also designed to approximate errors, estimating perturbation in poor sea condition. Lyapunov stability analysis shows that all signals are semi-global coherent and eventually bounded. In conclusion, the numerical comparison simulation experiments verify that the scheme has a strong anti-jamming capability and achieves good path following in large curve path.
BechlioulisCPRovithakisGA (2008) Prescribed performance adaptive control of SISO feedback linearizable systems with disturbances. In: 2008 16th Mediterranean conference on control and automation, Ajaccio, 25–27 June, pp. pp. 1035–1040. New York: IEEE.
2.
CaoYWenCSongY (2019) A unified event-triggered control approach for uncertain pure-feedback systems with or without state constraints. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics51(3): 1262–1271.
3.
ChuZZhuDYangSX (2016) Observer-based adaptive neural network trajectory tracking control for remotely operated vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems28(7): 1633–1645.
4.
DoKDPanJ (2006) Global robust adaptive path following of underactuated ships. Automatica42(10): 1713–1722.
5.
DongSShenZZhouL, et al. (2022) Nonlinear gain-based event-triggered tracking control of a marine surface vessel with output constraints. Ocean Engineering262: 112144.
6.
DuJHuXKrstićM, et al. (2016) Robust dynamic positioning of ships with disturbances under input saturation. Automatica73: 207–214.
7.
EncarnacaoPPascoalAArcakM (2000) Path following for autonomous marine craft. IFAC Proceedings Volumes33(21): 117–122.
8.
FossenTIBreivikMSkjetneR (2003) Line-of-sight path following of underactuated marine craft. IFAC Proceedings Volumes36(21): 211–216.
9.
FossenTIPettersenKYGaleazziR (2014) Line-of-sight path following for Dubins paths with adaptive sideslip compensation of drift forces. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology23(2): 820–827.
10.
FuMDongLXuY, et al. (2022) A novel asymmetrical integral barrier Lyapunov function-based trajectory tracking control for hovercraft with multiple constraints. Ocean Engineering263: 112132.
11.
LapierreLSoetantoD (2007) Nonlinear path-following control of an AUV. Ocean Engineering34(11–12): 1734–1744.
12.
LekkasAMFossenTI (2014) Integral los path following for curved paths based on a monotone cubic Hermite Spline Parametrization. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology22(6): 2287–2301.
13.
LiJDuJSunY, et al. (2019) Robust adaptive trajectory tracking control of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles with prescribed performance. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control29(14): 4629–4643.
14.
LinMZhangZPangY, et al. (2022) Underactuated USV path following mechanism based on the cascade method. Scientific Reports12(1): 1461.
15.
LiuTDongZDuH, et al. (2017) Path following control of the underactuated USV based on the improved line-of-sight guidance algorithm. Polish Maritime Research24(1): 3–11.
16.
OhSRSunJ (2010) Path following of underactuated marine surface vessels using line-of-sight based model predictive control. Ocean Engineering37(2–3): 289–295.
17.
ShenZBiYWangY, et al. (2020a) MLP neural network-based recursive sliding mode dynamic surface control for trajectory tracking of fully actuated surface vessel subject to unknown dynamics and input saturation. Neurocomputing377: 103–112.
18.
ShenZWangYYuH, et al. (2020b) Finite-time adaptive tracking control of marine vehicles with complex unknowns and input saturation. Ocean Engineering198: 106980.
19.
ThrunSMontemerloMDahlkampH, et al. (2006) Stanley: The robot that won the DARPA grand challenge. Journal of Field Robotics23(9): 661–692.
20.
WangNSuSF (2019) Finite-time unknown observer-based interactive trajectory tracking control of asymmetric underactuated surface vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology29(2): 794–803.
21.
WanLSuYZhangH, et al. (2020) An improved integral light-of-sight guidance law for path following of unmanned surface vehicles. Ocean Engineering205: 107302.
22.
XiangXLapierreLJouvencelB (2015) Smooth transition of AUV motion control: From fully-actuated to under-actuated configuration. Robotics and Autonomous Systems67: 14–22.
23.
XuJXJinX (2012) State-constrained iterative learning control for a class of MIMO systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control58(5): 1322–1327.
24.
YangXYanXLiuW, et al. (2022) An improved Stanley guidance law for large curvature path following of unmanned surface vehicle. Ocean Engineering266: 112797.
25.
ZhangGZhangX (2013) Concise robust adaptive path-following control of underactuated ships using DSC and MLP. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering39(4): 685–694.
26.
ZhangGZhangX (2015) A novel DVS guidance principle and robust adaptive path-following control for underactuated ships using low frequency gain-learning. ISA Transactions56: 75–85.
27.
ZhangSSangHSunX, et al. (2023) Research on the maneuverability and path following control of the wave glider with a propeller-rudder system. Ocean Engineering278: 114346.
28.
ZhaoZHeWGeSS (2013) Adaptive neural network control of a fully actuated marine surface vessel with multiple output constraints. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology22(4): 1536–1543.
29.
ZhouLShenZNieY, et al. (2023) Event-triggered adaptive dynamic programming for optimal tracking control of unmanned surface vessel with input constraints. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control45: 2835–2847.
