This paper presents a novel robust adaptive dual layer sliding mode control (ADLSMC) for the problem of high accuracy tracking trajectory of robot manipulator in the presence of uncertainties and external disturbances. This new control scheme has a dual layer structure. The first layer drives the robot manipulator system reaches the global nonlinear sliding surface in finite time, and the second layer tackles the values of the two control gains overestimation problem. Moreover, compared with the traditional super-twisting with time delay estimation algorithm, the proposed controller can realize not only set-point tracking but also dynamic tracking, which is very widely used in practice. The stability of the closed–loop system and the finite time convergence are analyzed using Lyapunov techniques. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by simulations and experimental studies.
AlwiYEdwardsC (2013) An adaptive sliding mode differentiator for actuator oscillatory failure case reconstruction. Automatica49(2): 642–651.
2.
AnkurGAkhileshS (2017) MIMO uncertain nonlinear system control via adaptive high-order super twisting sliding mode and its application to robotic manipulator. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems28(1): 36–49.
3.
BarthAReichhartingerKWulffK (2016) Certainty equivalence adaptation combined with super-twisting sliding-mode control. International Journal of Control89(9): 1767–1776.
4.
BoikoIFridmanL (2005) Analysis of chattering in continuous sliding-mode controllers. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control50(9): 1442–1446.
5.
CastanedaLAJuarezAL (2015) Robust trajectory tracking of a delta robot through adaptive active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology23(4): 1387–1398.
6.
ChenMWuQ XJiangCS (2012) Disturbance-observer-based robust synchronization control of uncertain chaotic systems. Nonlinear Dynamics70(4): 2421–2432.
7.
ChenCZhangCRHuT l, et al. (2019) Finite-time tracking control for uncertain robotic manipulators using backstepping method and novel extended state observer. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems16(3): 1–15.
8.
ChenXBMeiYFWuYL (2020) Observer-based boundary control for an asymmetric output constrained flexible robotic manipulator. SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences. DOI: 10.1007/s11432-2893-y.
9.
ChenZHuangFHSunWC, et al. (2020) RBF-neural-network-based adaptive robust control for nonlinear bilateral teleoperation manipulators with uncertainty and time delay. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics25(2): 906–918.
10.
CuongPVWangYN (2016) Adaptive trajectory tracking neural network control with robust compensator for robot manipulators. Neural Computing and Applications27(2): 525–536.
11.
EdwardsCShtesselY (2014) Dual layer adaptive sliding modecontrol. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, 4–6 June, pp. 4524–4529. IEEE.
12.
EdwardsCShtesselY (2015) Adaptive dual layer second-order sliding mode control and observation. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, 1–3 July, pp. 5853–5858. IEEE.
13.
EdwardsCShtesselY (2016a) Adaptive dual-layer super-twisting control and observation. International Journal of Control89(9): 1759–1766.
FengYYuXHManZH (2002) Non-singular terminal sliding mode control of rigid manipulators. Automatica38(12): 2159–2167.
16.
GalickiM (2016) Finite-time trajectory tracking control in a task space of robotic manipulators. Automatica67(3): 165–170.
17.
GolestaniMMobayenSTchierF (2016) Adaptive finite-time tracking control of uncertain non-linear n-order systems with unmatched uncertainties. IET Control Theory & Applications10(14): 1675–1683.
18.
GuoZY (2018) On a novel equivalent control based-adaptive sliding mode approach for autopilot design of BTT missiles. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(2): 1–13.
19.
GuoZYZhouJGuoJG (2017) Robust autopilot design for bank-to-turn missiles using adaptive dual-layer sliding mode control. Optik131(6): 383–398.
20.
HuJFLiCChenZ, et al. (2020) Precision motion control of 6-Dofs industrial robot with accurate payload estimation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics25(4): 1821–1829.
21.
HuQXuLZhangAH (2012) Adaptive backstepping trajectory tracking control of robot manipulator. Journal of the Franklin Institute349(3): 1087–1105.
22.
HuangPFWangDKMengZJ (2016) Impact dynamic modeling and adaptive target capturing control for tethered space robots with uncertainties. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics21(5): 2260–2271.
23.
KaliYSaadMBenjellounK (2018) Optimal super-twisting algorithm with time delay estimation for robot manipulator based on feedback linearization. Robotics and Autonomous Systems108(6): 87–99.
24.
KhalilH K (1992) Nonlinear Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
KobayshiSFurutaK (2007) Frequency characteristics of Levant’s differentiator and adaptive sliding mode control differentiator. International Journal of Systems Science38(10): 825–832.
26.
LevantA (2003) Higher-order sliding modes, differentiation and output feedback control. International Journal of Control76(9–10): 924–941.
27.
LevantA (2006) Quasi-continuous higher order sliding mode controller. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control50(3): 1812–1816.
28.
MehdiHBoubakerO (2011) Impedance controller tuned by particle swarm optimization for robotic arms. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems8(5): 93–103.
29.
MobayenSTchierFRagoubL (2017) Design of an adaptive tracker for n-link rigid robotic manipulators based on super-twisting global nonlinear sliding mode control. International Journal of Systems Science48(9): 1990–2002.
30.
MorenoJAOsorioM (2008) A Lyapunov approach to second order sliding mode controllers and observers. In: Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, 9–11 December, pp. 2856–2861. IEEE.
31.
PlestanFShetesselYBregeaultV (2010) New methodologies for adaptive sliding mode control. International Journal of Control83(9): 1907–1919.
32.
ShtesselYMorenoJAPlestanF (2010) Super-twisting adaptive sliding mode control: A Lyapunov design. In: Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlanta, GA, USA, 15–17 December, pp. 5109–5113. IEEE.
33.
ShtesselYTalebMPlestanF (2012) A novel adaptive-gain super-twisting sliding mode controller: Methodology and application. Automatica48(5): 759–769.
34.
SunLLiuYJ (2020) Extended state observer augmented finite-time trajectory tracking control of uncertain mechanical systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing139(15): 1–14.
35.
SunTPeiHLPanYP (2011) Neural network-based sliding mode adaptive control for robot manipulators. Neurocomputing74(14): 2377–2384.
36.
UtkinVIPoznyakAS (2013) Adaptive sliding mode control with application to super-twist algorithm: Equivalent control method. Automatica49(1): 39–47.
37.
VanMMavrovouniotisMGeSS (2019) An adaptive backstepping nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control for robust fault tolerant control of robot manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems49(7): 1448–1458.
38.
YangCGJiangYMHeW (2018) Adaptive parameter estimation and control design for robot manipulator with finite-time convergence. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics65(10): 8112–8123.
39.
YangZJFukushimaYQinP (2012) Decentralized adaptive robust control of robot manipulator using disturbance observers. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology20(5): 1357–1365.
40.
YassineKMaaroufSKhalidB (2018) Super-twisting algorithm with time delay estimation for uncertain robot manipulaors. Nonlinear Dynamics93(2): 557–569.
41.
YuSYuXShirinzadehB (2005) Continuous finite-time control for robotic manipulators with terminal sliding mode. Automatica41(11): 1957–1964.
42.
ZhangLYLiuLZWangZ (2018) Continuous finite-time control for uncertain robot manipulators with integral sliding mode. IET Control Theory & Applications12(11): 1621–1627.
43.
ZhaoDLiSZhuQ (2010) Robust finite-time control approach for robotic manipulators. IET Control Theory & Applications4(1): 1–15.
