This paper develops a distributed adaptive event-triggered iterative learning controller over a filtering network for a class of tracking control systems. The proposed distributed control method is more robust than centralized control in terms of node failure and transmission constraints. In view of the limited network bandwidth, adaptive event-triggered mechanisms (AETMs) have been considered in the network communication process. The proposed AETM is characterized by introducing the dynamic threshold parameter, which provides benefits in data scheduling. The existence of filters and controllers is analyzed by Lyapunov stability theory and linear matrix inequality techniques, and their parameters are finally obtained. Moreover, some simulation results on a numerical example and a irrigation canal are presented to show the applicability of the obtained results.
AlirezaeiGTaghizadehOMatharR (2015) Optimum power allocation in sensor networks for active radar applications. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications14(5): 2854–2867.
2.
AndreassonMDimarogonasDJohanssonK, et al. (2013) Distributed vs. centralized power systems frequency control. In: Proceedings of European Control Conference (ECC), Zurich, Switzerland, 17–19 July 2013, pp. 3524–3529. IEEE.
3.
BahreiniMZareiJRazaviFarR, et al. (2019) Robust finitetime stochastic stabilization and faulttolerant control for uncertain networked control systems considering random delays and probabilistic actuator faults. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(12): 3550–3561.
4.
BaiXWangZShengL, et al. (2019) Reliable data fusion of hierarchical wireless sensor networks with asynchronous measurement for greenhouse monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology27(3): 1036–1046.
5.
GeXHanQDingL, et al. (2020) Dynamic event-triggered distributed coordination control and its applications: A survey of trends and techniques. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems50(9): 3112–3125.
6.
GrahamRCortsJ (2012) Adaptive information collection by robotic sensor networks for spatial estimation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control57(6): 1404–1419.
7.
HespanhaJPNaghshtabriziPXuY (2007) A survey of recent results in networked control systems. Proceedings of the IEEE95(1): 138–172.
8.
HuangLSunM (2018) Improved analysis and control for networked control systems with time-varying delays and packet dropout. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(14): 3923–3932.
9.
HuangNSunZAndersonBDO, et al. (2020) Distributed and adaptive triggering control for networked agents with linear dynamics. Information Sciences517: 297–314.
10.
LiBWangYFengL, et al. (2020) Observer-based iterative learning control for linear time-varying systems using LMI. The Journal of Engineering2020(13): 643–646.
11.
LiMChenY (2019) Challenging research for networked control systems: A survey. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(9): 2400–2418.
12.
LiTJFujimotoY (2008) Control system with high-speed and real-time communication links. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics55(4): 1548–1557.
13.
LiQKLiXWangJ, et al. (2018) Stabilization of networked control systems using a mixed-mode based switched delay system method. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica5(6): 1089–1098.
14.
LiXMZhouQLiP, et al. (2020) Event-triggered consensus control for multi-agent systems against false data-injection attacks. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics50(5): 1856–1866.
15.
LiXWTangYKarimiHR (2020) Consensus of multi-agent systems via fully distributed event-triggered control. Automatica116: 108898-1–108898-9.
16.
LuoDWangJRShenD (2020) Iterative learning control for locally Lipschitz nonlinear fractional-order multi-agent systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute357(11): 6671–6693.
17.
MobayenS (2014) Design of LMI-based sliding mode controller with an exponential policy for a class of underactuated systems. Complexity21(5): 117–124.
18.
MobayenSMaJ (2018) Robust finite-time composite nonlinear feedback control for synchronization of uncertain chaotic systems with nonlinearity and time-delay. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals114: 46–54.
19.
MobayenSTchierF (2017) Nonsingular fast terminal sliding-mode stabilizer for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems based on disturbance observer. Scientia Iranica24(3): 1410–1418.
20.
NegenbornRRDe SchutterB (2008) A distributed model predictive control approach for the control of irrigation canals. In: Proceedings of the 1th International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA), Rotterdam, Netherlands, 10–12 November 2008, pp. 1–6. IEEE.
21.
NithyaVSakthivelRAlzahraniF (2020) Dissipative-based non-fragile filtering for fuzzy networked control systems with switching communication channels. Applied Mathematics and Computation373: 125011-1–125011-16.
22.
PersechiniMAMJotaFG (2013) Centralized and distributed control architectures under Foundation Fieldbus network. ISA Transactions52(1): 149–161.
23.
ShaoXShiYZhangW (2020) Input-and-measurement event-triggered control for flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicles with asymmetric partial-state constraints. Nonlinear Dynamics102(1): 163–183.
24.
ShenBWangZHungYS (2010) Distributed -consensus filtering in sensor networks with multiple missing measurements: The finite-horizon case. Automatica46(10): 1682–1688.
25.
SinopoliBSharpCSchenatoL, et al. (2003) Distributed control applications within sensor networks. Proceedings of the IEEE91(8):1235–1245.
26.
SuscaSBulloFMartinezS (2008) Monitoring environmental boundaries with a robotic sensor network. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology16(2): 288–296.
27.
WangHXieSZhouB, et al. (2020) Non-fragile robust filtering of takagi-sugeno fuzzy networked control systems with sensor failures. Sensors20(1): 27-1–27-15.
28.
WenJNguangSKZhaoX (2018) Collaborative distributed design for wireless control systems with Markovian-type control network and distributed network-induced time delays. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control28(17): 5464–5480.
29.
WengSYueDShiJ (2016) Distributed cooperative control for multiple photovoltaic generators in distribution power system under event-triggered mechanism. Journal of the Franklin Institute353(14): 3407–3427.
30.
XiaYQGaoYLYanLP, et al. (2015) Recent progress in networked control systems: A survey. International Journal of Automation and Computing12(4): 343–367.
31.
XiaoXParkJZhouL, et al. (2020)Event-triggered control of discrete-time switched linear systems with network transmission delays. Automatica111: 108585-1–108585-6.
32.
XuXLiZGaoL (2017) Distributed adaptive tracking control for multi-agent systems with uncertain dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics90(4): 2729–2744.
33.
YangWLiuMShiP (2012) filtering for nonlinear stochastic systems with sensor saturation, quantization and random packet losses. Signal Processing92(6): 1387–1396.
34.
YassineSNajibEKFatimaL (2019) A survey: Centralized, decentralized, and distributed control scheme in smart grid systems. In: Proceedings of 7th Mediterranean Congress of Telecommunications (CMT), Fez, Morocco, 24–25 October 2019, pp. 1–11. IEEE.
35.
ZhangXMHanQLYuX (2016) Survey on recent advances in networked control systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics12(5): 1740–1752.
36.
ZierhutEJBattistiRMachadoRAF, et al. (2020) Distributed control strategy with Smith’s predictor in a pilot-scale diabatic distillation unit. Chemical Engineering and Technology43(9): 1884–1896.
37.
ZhouQTianZShahidehpourM, et al. (2020) Distributed control and communication strategies in networked microgrids. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials22(4): 2586–2633.
38.
ZhuMYeLMaX (2020) Estimation-based quadratic iterative learning control for trajectory tracking of robotic manipulator with uncertain parameters. IEEE Access8: 43122–43133.
