This paper concerns the improvement on proportional-integration-derivative (PID) control for the electro-optical tracking system for high-mobility targets. To achieve higher tracking precision and stronger disturbance rejection while fully utilizing the existing PID loop, the add-on integration module is proposed and seamlessly integrated into the conventional PID loop. It is proven that for any given conventional PID controller parameters, the add-on integration module based PID control can improve the ability of error attenuation at low frequency and keep the stability of resulting closed-loop system. More importantly, the feasible set of all parameters in the added module is explicitly given. Based on the feasible set, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is adopted to obtain the globally optimal controller’s parameter under certain performance indices. The experiments are carried out for a typical electro-optical tracking test bed with several reference signals. It is shown that the proposed method has much smaller tracking errors than the existing PID method.
AlibejiNSharmaN (2017) A PID-type robust input delay compensation method for uncertain Euler–Lagrange systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology25(6): 2235–2242.
2.
ÅströmKJHägglundT (1995) PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning, volume 2. Instrument Society of America Research Triangle Park, NC.
3.
AthertonDPBozAF (2009) Time scaling in PID controller tuning. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control31(5): 425–433.
4.
ChenYFeiSLiY (2015) Stabilization of neutral time-delay systems with actuator saturation via auxiliary time-delay feedback. Automatica52: 242–247.
5.
ChuMXuCChuJ (2019) Graphic IMC-PID tuning based on maximum sensitivity for uncertain systems. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(8): 2196–2204.
6.
CvejnJVrančićD (2018) The magnitude optimum tuning of the PID controller: Improving load disturbance rejection by extending the controller. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(5): 1669–1680.
7.
DebKPratapAAgarwalSMeyarivanT (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation6(2): 182–197.
8.
DengCMaoYRenG (2016) Mems inertial sensors-based multi-loop control enhanced by disturbance observation and compensation for fast steering mirror system. Sensors16(11): 1920.
9.
DengCRenWMaoYRenG (2017) Plug-in module acceleration feedback control for fast steering mirror-based beam stabilization systems. Optical Engineering56(8): 084105.
10.
DorfRCBishopRH (2011) Modern Control Systems. Pearson.
11.
DuanXGDengHLiHX (2012) A saturation-based tuning method for fuzzy PID controller. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics60(11): 5177–5185.
12.
GaffardJBoyerC (1990) Adaptive optics: Effect of sampling rate and time lags on the closed loop bandwidth. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, August 1990, volume 1271. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 33–50.
13.
HeQLuoYMaoYZhouX (2018) An acceleration feed-forward control method based on fusion of model output and sensor data. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical284: 186–193.
14.
JiangYYinS (2018) Recursive total principle component regression based fault detection and its application to vehicular cyber-physical systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics14(4): 1415–1423.
15.
MaDChenJ (2018) Delay margin of low-order systems achievable by PID controllers. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control64(5): 1958–1973.
16.
MaDChenJLiuA, et al. (2019) Explicit bounds for guaranteed stabilization by PID control of second-order unstable delay systems. Automatica100: 407–411.
17.
MorariMZafiriouE (1989) Robust Process Control. Prentice Hall: Morari.
18.
NieZYZhuCWangQG, et al. (2020) Design, analysis and application of a new disturbance rejection PID for uncertain systems. ISA Transactions101: 281–294.
19.
PapadopoulosKGMargarisNI (2012) Extending the symmetrical optimum criterion to the design of PID type-p control loops. Journal of Process Control22(1): 11–25.
20.
PapadopoulosKGPapastefanakiENMargarisNI (2012) Explicit analytical PID tuning rules for the design of type-III control loops. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics60(10): 4650–4664.
21.
PapadopoulosKGTselepisNDMargarisNI (2013) Type-III closed loop control systems-digital PID controller design. Journal of Process Control23(10): 1401–1414.
22.
PengTZhouJZhangCSunN (2018) Modeling and combined application of orthogonal chaotic NSGA-II and improved topsis to optimize a conceptual hydrological model. Water Resources Management32(11): 3781–3799.
23.
PerezArancibiaNOGibsonJSTsaoT (2011) Observer-based intensity-feedback control for laser beam pointing and tracking. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology20(1): 31–47.
24.
ShiLMiaoXWangH (2020) An improved nonlinear proportional-integral-differential controller combined with fractional operator and symbolic adaptation algorithm. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control42(5): 927–941.
25.
SunLJinYPanL, et al. (2019) Efficiency analysis and control of a grid-connected PEM fuel cell in distributed generation. Energy Conversion and Management195: 587–596.
26.
SunLLiDLeeKY (2016) Optimal disturbance rejection for PI controller with constraints on relative delay margin. ISA Transactions63: 103–111.
27.
TahounA (2017) Anti-windup adaptive PID control design for a class of uncertain chaotic systems with input saturation. ISA Transactions66: 176–184.
28.
TanKLeeTMamunA, et al. (2001) Composite control of a gyro mirror line-of-sight stabilization platform-design and auto-tuning. ISA Transactions40(2): 155–171.
29.
TangTDengCYangT, et al. (2017) Error-based observer of a charge couple device tracking loop for fast steering mirror. Sensors17(3): 479.
30.
TangTGeRMaJFuC (2010) Compensating for some errors related to time delay in a charge-coupled-device-based fast steering mirror control system using a feedforward loop. Optical Engineering49(7): 073005.
31.
TangTMaJGeR (2011) PID-I controller of charge coupled device-based tracking loop for fast-steering mirror. Optical Engineering50(4): 043002.
32.
TeoYRRussellDAphaleSSFlemingAJ (2014) Optimal integral force feedback and structured PI tracking control: Application for objective lens positioner. Mechatronics24(6): 701–711.
33.
Vander VeldeWE (1968) Multiple-input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
WangQSunC (2016) Conditions for consensus in directed networks of agents with heterogeneous output saturation. IET Control Theory & Applications10(16): 2119–2127.
35.
WangRLiXAhmedQ, et al. (2018) Speed control of a marine engine using predictive functional control based PID controller. In: 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, USA, 27–29 June 2018, IEEE, pp. 3908–3914.
36.
WangXCaiXSuZ, et al. (2015) Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon. Nature518(7540): 516–519.
37.
XueWMadonskiRLakomyK, et al. (2017) Add-on module of active disturbance rejection for set-point tracking of motion control systems. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications53(4): 4028–4040.
38.
ZhangHZhouXWangZYanH (2019a) Maneuvering target tracking with event-based mixture kalman filter in mobile sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics50(10): 1–12.
39.
ZhangHZhouXWangZ, et al. (2019b) Adaptive consensus-based distributed target tracking with dynamic cluster in sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics49(5): 1580–1591.
40.
ZhouXMaoYZhangCHeQ (2018) A comprehensive performance improvement control method by fractional order control. IEEE Photonics Journal10(5): 1–11.
41.
ZieglerJGNicholsNB (1993) Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-transactions of The Asme115: 220–222.
