This paper studies the attitude-tracking control problem of spacecraft considering on-orbit refuelling. A time-varying inertia model is developed for spacecraft on-orbit refuelling, which actually includes two processes: fuel in the transfer pipe and fuel in the tank. Based upon the inertia model, an adaptive attitude-tracking controller is derived to guarantee the stability of the resulted closed-loop system, as well as asymptotic convergence of the attitude-tracking errors, despite performing refuelling operations. Finally, numerical simulations illustrate the effectiveness and performance of the proposed control scheme.
BoydSSastrySS (1986) Necessary and sufficient conditions for parameter convergence in adaptive control. Automatica22(6): 629–639.
2.
BaezEBravoYChavezD, et al. (2018) Tuning parameters optimization approach for dynamical sliding mode controllers. IFAC-PapersOnLine51(13): 656–661.
3.
ChatoD (2000) Technologies for refueling spacecraft on-orbit. In: Space 2000 Conference and Exposition, p. 5107.
4.
DunnBP (1987) High-energy orbit refueling for orbital transfer vehicles. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets24(6): 518–522.
5.
DuttaATsiotrasP (2010) Network flow formulation for cooperative peer-to-peer refueling strategies. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics33(5): 1539–1549.
6.
GeSSWangJ (2003) Robust adaptive tracking for time-varying uncertain nonlinear systems with unknown control coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control48(8): 1463–1469.
7.
HuQLDongHYZhangYM, et al. (2015) Tracking control of spacecraft formation flying with collision avoidance. Aerospace Science and Technology42: 353–364.
8.
JiangBYHuQLFriswellMI (2016). Fixed-time attitude control for rigid spacecraft with actuator saturation and faults. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology24(5): 1892–1898.
9.
KarasonSPAnnaswamyAM (1993) American Control Conference – Adaptive Control in the Presence of Input Constraints. American Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2–4 June 1993, pp.1370–1374. IEEE.
LiBQinKXiaoB, et al. (2019a) Finite-time Extended State Observer based fault tolerant output feedback control for attitude stabilization. ISA Transactions91: 11–20.
12.
LiBHuQLYangYS (2019b) Continuous finite-time extended state observer-based fault tolerant control for attitude stabilization. Aerospace Science and Technology84: 204–213.
13.
McNairS LTragesserS (2012) Dynamics of a thrusting, spinning satellite with changing center of mass position. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, p. 5014.
14.
MiddletonRHGoodwinGC (1988) Adaptive control of time-varying linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control33(2): 150–155.
15.
MorganL (2013) Orbital tanker designs and operational modes for orbit launch programs. In: 2nd Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 26 July–29 July 1965, p. 383. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1965-383
16.
OuyangYQYaoWChenXQ (2010) Mission programming of on-orbit re-fueling for geosynchronous satellites. Journal of Astronautics31: 2629–2634.
17.
SalehJHHastingsDENewmanDJ (2002) Spacecraft design lifetime. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets39(2): 244–257.
18.
SeoDAkellaM R (2008) High-performance spacecraft adaptive attitude-tracking control through attracting-manifold design. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics31(4): 884–891.
19.
ShaoXDHuQLShiY, et al. (2018) Fault-tolerant prescribed performance attitude tracking control for spacecraft under input saturation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology28(2): 574–582.
20.
ShenHTsiotrasP (2005) Peer-to-peer refueling for circular satellite constellations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics28(6): 1220–1230.
21.
SpucklerCM (1972) Liquid inflow to initially empty cylindrical tanks in low gravity. OH, United States: NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720021588
22.
SunLHuoW (2011) Satellite attitude robust nonlinear stabilization and tracking control with constrained inputs. Aerospace Control and Application37(4): 24–30.
23.
ThakurDSrikantSAkellaMR (2014) Adaptive attitude-tracking control of spacecraft with uncertain time-varying inertia parameters. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics38(1): 41–52.
24.
WallsgroveRJAkellaM R (2005) Globally stabilizing saturated attitude control in the presence of bounded unknown disturbances. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics28(5): 957–963.
25.
WangHChenLJinZH, et al. (2018) Adaptive momentum distribution jitter control for microsatellite. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics42(3): 632–641.
26.
WangLLiYZMaY, et al. (2016) On-orbit refilling technologies and schemes of liquid propellant. Journal of Aerospace Power31(8).
27.
WieBWeissHArapostathisA (1989) Quarternion feedback regulator for spacecraft eigenaxis rotations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics12(3): 375–380.
28.
XiaoBHuQLShiP (2013) Attitude stabilization of spacecrafts under actuator saturation and partial loss of control effectiveness. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology21(6): 2251–2263.
29.
XiaoBHuQLZhangY (2012) Adaptive sliding mode fault tolerant attitude tracking control for flexible spacecraft under actuator saturation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology20(6): 1605–1612.
30.
ZhaiGZhengHMLiangB (2018). Attitude dynamics of spacecraft with time-varying inertia during on-orbit refueling. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics41(8): 1744–1754.
31.
ZhangYIoannouPA (1997) Adaptive control of linear time varying systems. IEEE Conference on Decision & Control39(4): 651–659.
