This paper presents a stabilization control for positive, Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems subject to Markov jump parameters. In the continuous-time formulation, the approach guarantees mean-square stability with constraints on the control—the main condition hinges upon linear matrix inequalities. The proposed method’s usefulness is illustrated by a practical-oriented example, which was designed to control the output voltage of a DC-DC boost converter subject to both voltage and load variations driven by a Markov chain.
AzzoliniJATaoM (2018) A control strategy for improved efficiency in direct-coupled photovoltaic systems through load management. Applied Energy231: 926–936.
2.
BenzaouiaAMesquineFBenhayounM, et al. (2014). Stabilization of positive constrained T–S fuzzy systems: Application to a buck converter. Journal of the Franklin Institute351(8): 4111–4123.
3.
BolzernPColaneriP (2015) Positive Markov Jump Linear Systems. Hanover, MA: now Publishers Inc.
4.
BolzernPColaneriPDe NicolaoG (2014) Stochastic stability of positive Markov jump linear systems. Automatica50(4): 1181–1187.
5.
BoukasEK (2006) Stochastic Switching Systems: Analysis and Design. Boston: Birkhäuser.
6.
ChenYBoYDuB (2018) Stochastic stability of positive Markov jump linear systems with completely/partially known transition rates. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(9): 2724–2731.
7.
ChiuCSOuyangYL (2011) Robust maximum power tracking control of uncertain photovoltaic systems: A unified T–S fuzzy model-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology19(6): 1516–1526.
8.
CostaOLVFragosoMDTodorovMG (2013) Continuous-Time Markov Jump Linear Systems. Probability and Its Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
De JongH (2002) Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: A literature review. Journal of Computational Biology9(1): 67–103.
10.
DongSWuZGSuH, et al. (2019) Asynchronous control of continuous-time nonlinear Markov jump systems subject to strict dissipativity. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control64(3): 12501256.
11.
EricksonRWMaksimovicD (2001) Fundamentals of Power Electronics. New York: Springer.
12.
FragosoMDCostaOLV (2005) A unified approach for stochastic and mean square stability of continuoustime linear systems with Markovian jumping parameters and additive disturbances. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization44(4): 1165–1191.
13.
GuoY (2016) Stabilization of positive Markov jump systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute353(14): 3428–3440.
14.
KaczorekT (2002) Positive 1D and 2D Systems. London: Springer-Verlag.
15.
KhabouHSouissiMAitoucheA (2020) MPPT implementation on boost converter by using T–S fuzzy method. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation167: 119–134.
16.
KimSH (2017) H2 control of Markovian jump LPV systems with measurement noises: Application to a dc-motor device with voltage fluctuations. Journal of the Franklin Institute354(4): 1784–1800.
17.
LiSXiangZLinHKarimiHR (2016) State estimation on positive Markovian jump systems with time-varying delay and uncertain transition probabilities. Information Sciences369: 251–266.
18.
LiYSunHZongGHouL (2017) Composite anti-disturbance resilient control for Markovian jump nonlinear systems with partly unknown transition probabilities and multiple disturbances. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control27(14): 2323–2337.
19.
LinZLiuJWuQNiuY (2018) Mixed pitch control of wind turbine with a Markovian jump model. International Journal of Control91(1): 156–169.
20.
MaoX (1999) Stability of stochastic differential equations with Markovian switching. Stochastic Processes and their Applications79(1): 45–67.
21.
MaritonM (1990) Jump Linear Systems in Automatic Control. New York: Marcel Dekker.
22.
Márquez-VeraMARamos-VelascoLBalderrama-HernándezB (2018). Stable fuzzy control and observer via LMIs in a fermentation process. Journal of Computational Science27: 192–198.
23.
Moreno-ValenzuelaJGuzman-GuemezJ (2016) Experimental evaluations of voltage regulators for a saturated boost DC-to-DC power converter. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control38(3): 327–337.
24.
ParkISKwonNKParkP (2018) A linear programming approach for stabilization of positive Markovian jump systems with a saturated single input. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems29: 322–332.
25.
QiWGaoX (2016) Finite-time L1 control for positive Markovian jump systems with constant time delay and partly known transition rates. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control38(3): 348–355.
26.
QiWGaoXKaoY, et al. (2017) Stabilization for positive Markovian jump systems with actuator saturation. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing36(1): 374–388.
27.
Ramos-HernanzJLopez-GuedeJMBarambonesO, et al. (2017) Novel control algorithm for MPPT with boost converters in photovoltaic systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy42(28): 17831–17855.
28.
ShawPGaranayakP (2019) Analysis, design and implementation of analog circuitry-based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic boost DC/DC converter. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(3): 668–686.
29.
ShenHLiFWuZG, et al. (2018) Fuzzy-model-based nonfragile control for nonlinear singularly perturbed systems with semi-Markov jump parameters. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems26(6): 3428–3439.
30.
ShenHMenYWuZG, et al. (2019) Network-based quantized control for fuzzy singularly perturbed semi-Markov jump systems and its application. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers66(66): 1130–1140.
31.
SolimanHMYousefHA (2015) Saturated robust power system stabilizers. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems73: 608–614.
32.
SreekumarCAgarwalV (2008) A hybrid control algorithm for voltage regulation in DC–DC boost converter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics55(6): 2530–2538.
33.
SuLYeD (2018) Mixed H∞ and passive event-triggered reliable control for T–S fuzzy Markov jump systems. Neurocomputing281: 96–105.
34.
TanakaKWangH (2002) Fuzzy Control Systems Design and Analysis: A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
VargasANPujolGAchoL (2017) Stability of Markov jump systems with quadratic terms and its application to RLC circuits. Journal of the Franklin Institute354(1): 332–344.
36.
VargasANSampaioLPAchoL, et al. (2016) Optimal control of DC-DC buck converter via linear systems with inaccessible Markovian jumping modes. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology24(5): 1820–1827.
37.
WeiYYangQ (2018) Dynamics of the stochastic low concentration trimolecular oscillatory chemical system with jumps. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation59: 396–408. John Wiley & Sons.
38.
WuFGrigoriadisKMPackardA (2000) Anti-windup controller design using linear parameter-varying control methods. International Journal of Control73(12): 1104–1114.
39.
WuZGDongSSuHLiC (2018) Asynchronous dissipative control for fuzzy Markov jump systems. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics48(8): 2426–2436.
40.
WuZGShenYShiP, et al. (2019) H∞ control for 2-D Markov jump systems in roesser model. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control64(1): 427–432.
41.
ZhaiSSunYCuiH, et al. (2019) Adjustable loads control and stochastic stability analysis for multi-energy generation system based on Markov model. Neural Computing and Applications32(6): 1–13.
ZhangLGaoHKaynakO (2013) Network-induced constraints in networked control systems–A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics9(1): 403–416.
44.
ZhangLNingZShiP (2015) Input–output approach to control for fuzzy Markov jump systems with time-varying delays and uncertain packet dropout rate. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 45(11): 2449–2460.
45.
ZhangL.PrieurC. (2017). Stochastic stability of Markov jump hyperbolic systems with application to traffic flow control. Automatica, 86:29–37.
46.
ZongG.LiY.SunH. (2019). Composite anti-disturbance resilient control for Markovian jump nonlinear systems with general uncertain transition rate. Science China Information Sciences, 62(2):22205.
