Decentralized observer-based optimal control using two-point boundary value successive approximation approach application for a multimachine power system
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2020
Decentralized observer-based optimal control using two-point boundary value successive approximation approach application for a multimachine power system
In this paper, we present a new decentralized observer for a class of nonlinear interconnected systems, based on an optimal control law using the two-point boundary value (TPBV) successive approximation approach. This technique, used previously to develop a nonlinear decentralized suboptimal control for a multimachine power system, inspired us to develop a new method to design a decentralized observer-based suboptimal control law for the same system. The TPBV approach is characterized by the transformation of each high order coupling nonlinear TPBV problem into a sequence of linear decoupling TPBV problems that uniformly converge to the optimal control for nonlinear interconnected large-scale systems. Sufficient conditions for the asymptotic stability of the developed feedback control scheme are proposed in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) constraints, which can be efficiently solved by the LMI optimization techniques, to compute the control and the observation gains of the overall system. We applied this approach to a three-machine power system which generators are nonlinear systems strongly interconnected. We demonstrated clearly, via advanced simulations, that this approach was able to bring good performances, improving effectively transient stability of this power system in few iterative sequences while allowing the reconstruction of its non-measurable state variables.
AkhrifOOkouFADessaintLA, et al. (1999) Application of mulitivariable feedback linearization scheme for rotor angle stability and voltage regulation of power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems14(2): 620–628.
2.
AtassiANKhalilHK (1999) A separation principle for the stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control44(9): 1672–1687.
3.
Benhadj BraiekNRotellaF (1995) State observer design for a class of nonlinear system. Journal of Systems Analysis Modelling and Simulation17(3): 265–277.
4.
Benhadj BraiekNRotellaFBenrejebM (1995) Algebraic criteria for global stability analysis of nonlinear systems. Journal of Systems Analysis Modelling and Simulation17(3): 211–227.
5.
Benhadj BraiekN (1995) Feedback stabilization and stability domain estimation of nonlinear systems. Journal of The Franklin Institute332(2): 183–193.
6.
BernussouJTitliAS (1982) Interconnected Dynamical Systems: Stability, Decomposition and Decentralisation. vol. 5. Netherlands: North-Holland systems and control series.
7.
BornePGentinaJC (1974) On the stability of large nonlinear systems structured and simultaneous Lyapunov for system stability problems. In: Joint Automatic Control Conference, Austin, Texas.
8.
ElloumiSBenhadj BraiekN (2012) A decentralized stabilization approach of a class of nonlinear polynomial interconnected systems- application for a large-scale power system. Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory12(2): 159–172.
9.
ElloumiSAbidiBBenhadj BraiekN (2013) Decentralized optimal controller design for multimachine power system using successive approximation approach. Journal of the Franklin Institute350(10): 2994–3010.
10.
FalbPLJongJL (1969) Some Successive Approximation Methods in Control and Oscillation Theory 1st edition. vol 59. New York: Academic Press, 1–322.
11.
FinneyJDHeckBS (1996) Matrix scaling for large-scale system decomposition. Automatica32(8): 1177–1181.
12.
GuptaFBandyopadhyayBKulkarniAM (2005) Power system stabiliser for multimachine power system using robust decentralised periodic output feedback. IEE Proceedings-Control Theory and Applications152(1): 3–8.
13.
GuoYHillDJWangY (2000) Nonlinear decentralized control for large scale power systems. Automatica36(9): 1275–1289.
14.
HouZG (2001) A hierarchical optimization neural network for large-scale dynamic systems. Automatica37(12): 1931–1940.
15.
JiangLWuQHWenJY (2004) Decentralized nonlinear adaptive control for multimachine power systems via high gain perturbation observer. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, Regular Papers51(10): 2052–2059.
16.
KalsiKLianJZakSH (2008) Decentralized control of nonlinear interconnected systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Corsica, France, 25–27 June 2008, pp. 952–957. IEEE.
17.
LavaeiJAghdamAG (2006) Decentralized control design for interconnected systems based on a centralized reference controller. Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, pp. 13–15. USA: Manchester Grand Hyatt Hotel.
18.
LienCH (2004) Robust observer-based control of systems with state perturbations via LMI approach. IEEE Transations on Automatic Control49(8): 1365–1370.
19.
LiuaYGZhangaJF (2004) Reduced-order observer-based control design for nonlinear stochastic systems. Systems and Control Letters52(2): 123–135.
20.
LuPFTangGYJiaXB, et al. (2004) Successive approximation approach of suboptimal control for nonlinear time-delay systems. Control and Decision19(2): 230–234.
21.
MahmoudMSHassanMFDarwichMG (1985) Large Scale Control Systems, Theories and Techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.
22.
PetersonIRMcFarlaneDC (1994) Optimal guaranteed cost control and filtering for uncertain systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control39(9): 1971–1977.
23.
PertewAMMarquezHJZhaoQ (2006) Observer design for Lipschitz nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control51(7): 1211–1216.
24.
RotellaFDauphin-TanguyG (1988) Nonlinear systems: Identification and optimal control. International Journal of Control48(2): 525–544.
25.
SaoudiDMechmecheCBenhadj BraiekN (2010) T-S fuzzy bilinear observer for a class of nonlinear system. In: 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, MED’10, Marrakech, Morocco, 23–25 June 2010, pp. 1395–1400. IEEE.
26.
SaoudiDChadliMMechmecheC, et al. (2012) Unknown input observer design for fuzzy bilinear system: An LMI approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering2012: 1–21.
27.
SiljakDD (1978) Large-Scale Dynamic Systems: Stability and Structure (North-Holland Series in System Science and Engineering). New York: North-Holland.
28.
SongBHedrickJK (2003) Observer-based dynamic surface control for Lipschitz nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, Hawaii, December 2003, pp. 974–879. USA: IEEE.
29.
TangGYSunL (2005) Optimal control for nonlinear interconnected largescale systems: A successive approximation approach. ACTA Automatica Sinica31(2): 248–254.
30.
TliliASBenhadj BraiekN (2009) Decentralized observer based guaranteed cost control for nonlinear interconnected systems. International Journal of Control Automation 2(2): 29–45.
31.
WangYHillDJGuoG (1998) Robust decentralized control for multi-machine power systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications45(3): 271–279.
32.
WuXLWuXJLuoXY, et al. (2011) Design of observer-based adaptive controller for nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics and actuator dead-zone. International Journal of Automation and Computing8(2): 201–208.
33.
YangGHZhangSY (1995) Structural properties of large-scale systems possessing similar structures. Automatica31(7): 1011–1017.
34.
ZecevicAISiljakDD (2010) Estimating the region of attraction for large-scale systems with uncertainties. Automatica46(2): 445–451.
