The problem of designing a mean-square filter has been studied for stochastic polynomial systems, where the state equation switches between two different nonlinear functions, over linear observations. A switching signal depends on a random variable modelled as a Bernoulli distributed sequence that takes the quantities of zero and one. The differential equations for the state estimate and the error covariance matrix are obtained in a closed form by expressing the conditional expectation of polynomial terms as functions of the estimate and covariance matrix. Finite-dimensional filtering equations are obtained for a particular case of a third-degree polynomial system. Numerical simulations are carried out in two cases of switching between different linear and second degree polynomial functions.
BavdekarVANandolaNNPatwardhanSC (2016) Maximum likelihood estimation of noise covariance matrices for state estimation of autonomous hybrid systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering94: 28–44.
3.
BasinMV (2003) On optimal filtering for polynomial systems states. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control125: 123–125.
4.
BasinMVCalderon-AlvarezDSkliarM (2008) Optimal filtering for incompletely measured polynomial states over linear observations. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing22: 482–494.
5.
BasinMV (2008) New Trends in Optimal Filtering and Control for Polynomial and Time-Delay Systems. Berlin: Springer.
6.
BasinMVHernandez-GonzalezM (2014) Discrete–time ℋ∞ filtering for nonlinear polynomial systems. International Journal of Systems Science47(9): 2058–2066.
7.
BlomHAPBar-ShalomY (1988) The interacting multiple model algorithm for systems with Markovian switching coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control33(8): 780–783.
8.
DjemaiMDefoortM (2015) Hybrid Dynamical Systems. Observation and Control. Switzerland: Springer.
9.
DongHWangZLamJet al. (2014) Distributed filtering in sensor networks with randomly occurring saturations and successive packet dropouts. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control24: 1743–1759.
10.
DoucetAGordonNJKrishnamurthyV (2001) Particle filters for state estimation of jump Markov linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing49(3): 613–624.
11.
DoucetAAndrieuC (2001) Iterative algorithms for state estimation of jump Markov linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing49(6): 1216–1227.
12.
EleffendiMAJohnsonCM (2016) Application of Kalman filter to estimate junction temperature in IGBT power modules. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics31(2): 1576–1587.
13.
ElenchezhiyanMPrakashJ (2015) State estimation of stochastic nonlinear hybrid dynamic system using an interacting multiple model algorithm. ISA Transactions58: 520–532.
14.
ElliotRJDufourFSworderDD (1996) Exact hybrid filters in discrete time. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control41(12): 1807–1810.
15.
FerranteFGouaisbautFSanfeliceRGet al. (2016) State estimation of linear systems in the presence of sporadic measurements. Automatica73: 101–109.
16.
GiridharagopalKPagurekBWoodsideCM (1978) A modeling approach to state estimation in systems with switching parameters. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control23(5): 948–951.
17.
HetelLFridmanE (2015) Sample-data control of switched affine systems. In: DjemaiMDefoortM (eds) Hybrid Dynamical Systems. Observation and Control. Switzerland: Springer, pp.241–259.
18.
GrimbleMJ (1993) Polynomial matrix solution of the H infinity filtering problem and the relationship to Riccati equations state-space results. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing41(1): 67–81.
19.
HasegawaYShimayoshiTAmanoAet al. (2016) Application of the Kalman filter for faster strong coupling of cardiovascular simulations. IEEE Journal of the Biomedical and Health Informatics20(4): 1100–1106.
20.
Hernandez-GonzalezMBasinMV (2014) Discrete-time filtering for nonlinear polynomial systems over linear observations. International Journal of Systems Science45(7): 1461–1472.
21.
KailathT (1974) A view of three decades of linear filtering theory. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory20(2): 146–181.
22.
KalmanRE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transactions of the ASME-Journal of Basic Engineering82(Series D): 35–45.
23.
KalmanREBucyRS (1961) New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. Transactions of the ASME. Series D, Journal of the Basic Engineering83: 95–107.
24.
KushnerHJ (1967a) Approximations to optimal optimal nonlinear filters. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control12: 546–556.
25.
KushnerHJ (1967b) Dynamical equations for optimal nonlinear filtering. Journal of Differential Equations3: 179–190.
26.
KushnerHJ (1967c) Nonlinear filtering: The exact dynamical equations satisfied by the conditional mode. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control12: 262–267.
27.
LiHWangLDuHet al. (2017) Adaptive fuzzy backstepping tracking control for strict-feedback systems with input delay. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems25(3): 642–652.
28.
LiWJiaY (2010) ℋ∞ filtering for a class of nonlinear discrete time systems based on unscented transform. Signal Processing90: 3301–3307.
29.
LiuW (2014) Optimal filtering for discrete-time linear systems with multiplicative and time-correlated additive measurement noises. IET Control Theory and Applications9(6): 831–842.
30.
PugachevVS (1984) Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics for Engineers. London: Pergamon Press.
31.
PugachevVSSinitsynIN (2001) Stochastic Systems. Theory and Applications. New Jersey: World Scientific.
32.
RayyamMZaziMHajjiYet al. (2016) Stator and rotor faults detection in induction motor (IM) using the extended Kaman filter (EKF). In: 2016 international conference on electrical and information technologies (ICEIT) (eds EssaaidiMEl HaniS), Tangiers, Morocco, 4–7 May 2016, pp.148–152.
33.
RiosHDavilaJFridmanL (2015) State estimation on switching systems via high-order sliding modes. In: DjemaiMDefoortM (eds) Hybrid Dynamical Dystems. Observation and ControlSwitzerland: Springer, pp.151–178.
34.
RossS (2010) A First Course in Probability. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
35.
ShenBTanHWangZet al. (2017) Quantized/saturated control for sampled-data systems under noisy sampling intervals: A confluent Vandermonde matrix approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 62(9): 4753–4759.
36.
ShenBWangZHuangT (2016) Stabilization for sampled-data systems under noisy sampling interval. Automatica63: 162–166.
37.
ShenBWangZHungYSet al. (2011) Distributed ℋ∞ filtering for polynomial nonlinear stochastic systems in sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics58(5): 1971–1979.
38.
SimonD (2010) Kalman filtering with state constraints: A survey of linear and nonlinear algorithms. IET Control Theory and Applications4(8): 1303–1318.
39.
SohJWuX (2017) An FPGA-based unscented Kalman filter for system-on-chip applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-II: Express Briefs64(4): 447–451.
40.
SuzdalevaENagyI (2012) Recursive state estimation for hybrid systems. Applied Mathematical Modelling36: 1347–1358.
41.
SworderDDVojakR (1994) Hybrid estimation algorithms. Journal of optimization theory and applications81(1): 143–167.
42.
TalebiSPKannaSMandicDP (2016) A distributed quaternion Kalman filter with applications to smart grid tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks2(4): 477–488.
43.
TarnT-JRasisY (1976) Observers for nonlinear stochastic systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control21(4): 441–448.
44.
YangHShuHWangZet al. (2016) Almost sure state estimation with H2-type performance constraints for nonlinear hybrid stochastic systems. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems19: 26–37.
45.
ZhangQ (1999) Optimal filtering of discrete-time hybrid systems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications100(1): 123–144.
46.
ZhouQLiHShiP (2015) Decentralized adaptive fuzzy tracking control for robot finger dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems23(3): 501–510.
