In this paper, an optimal control scheme is presented for a ship in the presence of external disturbances. Using the backstepping technique and a disturbance observer method, a nonlinear control scheme has been designed and its closed loop system stability has been guaranteed. The parameters of the proposed controller have been optimized via a metaheuristic optimization algorithm called the firefly algorithm. In the optimization design, the modified Integral of the time-weighted absolute value of the error has been used as the cost function. To prove the effectiveness of the controller, the results are compared via simulation with the traditional backstepping controller on a model ship named Cybership II.
AtwellJABorggaardJTKingBB (2001) Reduced order controllers for burgers equation with a nonlinear observer. Applied Mathematics And Computer Science11(6): 1311–1330.
2.
BasuBMahantiGK (2011) Firefly and artificial bees colony algorithm for synthesis of scanned and broadside linear array antenna. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B 32: 169–190.
ChatterjeeAMahantiGKChatterjeeA (2012) Design of a fully digital controlled reconfigurable switched beam concentric ring array antenna using firefly and particle swarm optimization algorithm. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B36: 113–131.
5.
ChenMGeSS (2013) Direct adaptive neural control for a class of uncertain nonaffine nonlinear systems based on disturbance observer. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics43(4): 1213–1225.
6.
ChenWHYangJGuoLet al. (2016) Disturbance-observer-based control and related methods an overview. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics63(2): 1083–1095.
7.
DoKDJiangZPPanJ (2004) Robust adaptive path following of underactuated ships. Automatica40(6): 929–944.
8.
DorigoMBirattariMStutzleT (2006) Ant colony optimization. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine1(4): 28–39.
9.
DuanHQiaoP (2014) Pigeon-inspired optimization: A new swarm intelligence optimizer for air robot path planning. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics7(1): 24–37.
10.
FossenTI (2002) Marine Control Systems: Guidance, Navigation and Control of Ships, Rigs and Underwater VehiclesMarine Cybernetics, Trondheim, Norway.
11.
FossenTI (2011) Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
GillmerTCJohnsonB (1982) Introduction to Naval Architecture. Annapolis, Maryland, US: Naval Institute Press.
14.
HanJ (2009) From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics56(3): 900–906.
15.
HollandJH (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. Michigan, US: University of Michigan Press.
16.
IoannouPASunJ (2012) Robust Adaptive Control. Mineola, New York, US: Dover Publications.
17.
KarabogaDBasturkB (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: Artificial bee colony (abc) algorithm. Journal of Global Optimization39(3): 459–471.
18.
KatebiMGrimbleMZhangY (1997) H1 robust control design for dynamic ship positioning. IEE Proceedings-Control Theory and Applications144(2): 110–120.
19.
KennedyJEberhartRCShiY (2001) Swarm Intelligence. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Inc.
20.
LewisSMCratsleyCK (2008) Flash signal evolution, mate choice, and predation in fireflies. Annual Review of Entomology53: 293–321.
21.
LiSYangJChenWHet al. (2014) Disturbance observer-based control: Methods and applications. Boca Raton, Florida, US: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis group.
MontanariMPeresadaSMRossiCet al. (2007) Speed sensorless control of induction motors based on a reduced-order adaptive observer. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology15(6): 1049–1064.
24.
MoreiraLFossenTISoaresCG (2007) Path following control system for a tanker ship model. Ocean Engineering34(14): 2074–2085.
25.
PourkargarDBArmaouA (2013) Modification to adaptive model reduction for regulation of distributed parameter systems with fast transients. AIChE Journal59(12): 4595–4611.
26.
PourkargarDBArmaouA (2015) Design of apod-based switching dynamic observers and output feedback control for a class of nonlinear distributed parameter systems. Chemical Engineering Science136: 62–75.
27.
QianDTongSGuoJet al. (2015) Leader-follower-based formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots with mismatched uncertainties via integral sliding mode. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering229(6): 559–569.
28.
QianDTongSLiC (2016) Leader-following formation control of multiple robots with uncertainties through sliding mode and nonlinear disturbance observer. ETRI Journal38(5): 1008–1018.
29.
ShiY (2011) Brain storm optimization algorithm. In: 2nd International conference in swarm intelligence, Chongqing, China, 12–15 June, pp.303–309. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
30.
SkjetneRFossenTIKokotovićPV (2005) Adaptive maneuvering, with experiments, for a model ship in a marine control laboratory. Automatica41(2): 289–298.
31.
SolsonaJVallaMIMuravchikC (1996) A nonlinear reduced order observer for permanent magnet synchronous motors. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics43(4): 492–497.
32.
TeeKPGeSS (2006) Control of fully actuated ocean surface vessels using a class of feedforward approximators. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology14(4): 750–756.
33.
TomeraM (2010) Nonlinear controller design of a ship autopilot. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science20(2): 271–280.
34.
TzengCY (1999) An internal model control approach to the design of yaw-rate-control shipsteering autopilot. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering24(4): 507–513.
35.
WeiQWangHWuQet al. (2015) Backstepping-based attitude control for a quadrotor UAV using nonlinear disturbance observer. In: 2015 34th Chinese control conference, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China, 28–30 July, pp.771–776. Piscataway, New Jersey, US: IEEE.
36.
WitkowskaATomeraMSmierzchalskiR (2007) A backstepping approach to ship course control. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science17(1): 73–85.
37.
YangJLiSSuJet al. (2013a) Continuous nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for systems with mismatched disturbances. Automatica49(7): 2287–2291.
38.
YangJLiSSunCet al. (2013b) Nonlinear-disturbance-observer-based robust ight control for airbreathing hypersonic vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems49(2): 1263–1275.
39.
YangJSuJLiSet al. (2014a) High-order mismatched disturbance compensation for motion control systems via a continuous dynamic sliding-mode approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics10(1): 604–614.
40.
YangJZhaoZLiSet al. (2014b) Composite predictive ight control for airbreathing hypersonic vehicles. International Journal of Control87(9): 1970–1984.
41.
YangJZhengWX (2014) Offset-free nonlinear MPC for mismatched disturbance attenuation with application to a static var compensator. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs61(1): 49–53.
42.
YangXS (2009) Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. In: 5th International symposium on stochastic algorithms: Foundation and applications. Sapporo, Japan, 26–28 October, pp.169–178. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
43.
ZamanMAMatinMA (2012) Nonuniformly spaced linear antenna array design using firefly algorithm. International Journal of Microwave Science and Technology, vol. 2012, Article ID 256759.
44.
ZhangRJChenYBSunZQet al. (2000) Path control of a surface ship in restricted waters using sliding mode. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology8(4): 722–732.
