In this paper, we utilize the probability density function of the data to estimate the minimum variance lower bound (MVLB) of a nonlinear system. For this purpose, the Gaussian Process (GP) model has been used. With this model, given a new input and based on past observations, we naturally obtained the variance of the predictive distribution of the future output, which enabled us to estimate MVLB as well as estimation uncertainty. Also, an advantage of the proposed method over others is its ability to estimate MVLB recursively. The application of this method to the real-life dynamic process (experimental four-tank process) indicates that this approach gives very credible estimates of the MVLB.
AlipouriYPoshtanJ (2014b) Minimum variance lower bound estimation and realization for desired structures. ISA Transactions53(3): 787–792.
4.
AlipouriYPoshtanJ (2014c) A linear approach to generalized minimum variance controller design for MIMO nonlinear systems. Nonlinear Dynamics77(3): 935–949.
5.
AlipouriYPoshtanJ (2016) Robust minimum variance lower bound estimation by uncertainty modeling using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy set. Asian Journal of Control19(1): 47–56.
6.
AstromKJ (1970) Introduction to Stochastic Control TheoryNew York: Academic Press.
7.
DesboroughLHarrisTJ (1993, August) Performance assessment measures for univariate feedforward/feedback control. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering71(4): 605–616.
HarrisTJ (1989) Assessment of control loop performance. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering67(5): 856–861.
12.
HarrisTJ (1999) A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems. Journal Process of Control9(1): 1–17.
13.
HarrisTJYuW (2007) Controller assessment for a class of nonlinear systems. Journal of Process Control17: 607–619.
14.
HorchAIsakssonAJ (1999) A modified index for control performance assessment. Journal of Process Control9(6): 475–483.
15.
HuangBShahSL (1999) Performance assessment of control loops: Theory and applications. London: Springer, London.
16.
JelaliM (2006) An overview of control performance assessment technology and industrial applications. Control Engineering Practice14(5): 441–466.
17.
JelaliM (2010) Control System Performance Monitoring Assessment, Diagnosis and Improvement of Control Loop Performance in Industrial Automation. London: Springer-Verlag.
18.
JohanssonKH (2000) The quadruple-tank process: A multivariable laboratory process with an adjustable zero. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology8(3): 456–465.
19.
KoBSEdgarTF (2000) Performance assessment of cascade control loops. AIChE J.46(2): 281–291.
20.
KoBSEdgarTF (2001) Performance assessment of multivariable feedback control systems. Automatica37(6): 899–905.
21.
KoBEdgarTE (2004) PID control performance assessment: The single-loop case. AIChE Journal50(6): 1211–1218.
22.
KocijanJBankoBLikarBet al. (2003) A case based comparison of identification with neural network and Gaussian process models. In: International Conference on Intelligent Control Systems and Signal Processing, Portugal, 8–11 April 2003, pp. 137–142.
23.
LiZ (2011) A generalized minimum variance controller for MIMO time-varying systems. International Journal Computer Applications in Technology41(1): 78–83: 456–465.
24.
Murray-SmithRSbarbaroDEdward RasmussenCGirardA (2003) Adaptive, cautious, predictive control with Gaussian Process priors. In: 13th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Zuid-Holland, 27 August 2003, pp. 1195–1200.
25.
PrabhuAV (2008) Performance monitoring of run-to-run control systems used in semiconductor manufacturing. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas.
26.
YanouADengMInoueA (2009) A design of a strongly stable generalized minimum variance control using a genetic algorithm. ICROS-SICE International Joint Conference 2009, Fukuoka International Congress Center, Japan, 18–21 August, pp. 1300–1304.
27.
YuWWilsonDIYoungBR (2010) Control performance assessment for nonlinear systems. Journal of Process Control20(10): 1235–1242.
28.
YuWWilsonDIYoungBR (2012) A comparison of nonlinear control performance assessment techniques for nonlinear processes. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering90(6): 1442–1449.
29.
ZhangLHuLSZhangXL (2011) In: Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Chinese, 23–25 May 2011, pp. 1863–1868. IEEE.
30.
ZhouYFWanF (2008) A neural network approach to control performance assessment. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics1(4): 1617–1633.
