Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The integrated strapdown inertial navigation system/global position system (SINS/GPS) is a widely used procedure for position, velocity and attitude determination. There are two options for the state estimation procedure by a filtering system model and the integration filter, namely direct navigation mode that estimates the navigation parameters and indirect navigation mode that estimates the error of navigation parameters with a feedback calculation process. To a certain extent, they both have their own advantages. However, determining which one of the two navigation modes will be more celebrated than the other under different conditions is a beneficial but thus far less seriously treated issue. In this study, two navigation modes are systematically studied in terms of the filtering system model, filtering algorithm and application issues. The simulation test and car-mounted experiments for low-precision and high-precision SINS are carried out to compare the performance of two navigation modes under different conditions. The results prove that direct navigation mode outperforms indirect navigation mode in terms of estimation accuracy and stability for poor conditions, but for good conditions, the advantages of direct navigation mode are compromised due to the large computational burden. Therefore, this study is also expected to facilitate the selection of the appropriate navigation model in practice under different conditions.

Keywords

Car-mounted experiment integrated navigation navigation mode non-linear filter SINS/GPS

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Crassidis

(2006) Sigma-point Kalman filtering for integrated GPS and inertial navigation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 42(2): 750–756.

Crassidis

Markley

(1996) Attitude estimation using modified Rodrigues parameters. In: Proceedings of the Flight Mechanics/Estimation Theory Symposium, NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, pp. 71–83.

Crassidis

Markley

(2003) Unscented filtering for spacecraft attitude estimation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 26(4): 536–542.

Cheon

(2007) Unscented filtering in unit quaternion space for spacecraft attitude estimation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial and Electronics, Vigo, pp. 66–71.

Chen

(2012) Kalman filter for robot vision: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 59 (11): 4409–4420.

Chang

. (2012) Strapdown inertial navigation system alignment based on marginalised unscented Kalman filter. IET Science, Measurement and Technology 7(2): 128–138.

Chang

(2013a). Modified unscented quaternion estimator based on quaternion averaging. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 37(1): 305–309.

Chang

. (2013b) Transformed unscented Kalman filter. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 49(2): 1400–1402.

Chang

. (2013c) Unscented type Kalman filter: limitation and combination. IET Signal Processing 7(3): 167–176.

10.

Fang

Gong

(2010) Predictive iterated Kalman filter for INS/GPS integration and its application to SAR motion compensation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 59(4): 909–915.

11.

Groves

(2008) Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems. Norwood, MA: Artech House.

12.

Julier

Uhlmann

Durrant-Whyte

(2000) A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 45(3): 477–482.

13.

Kim

Lee

Park

(2009) Adaptive two-stage extended Kalman filter for a fault-tolerant INS-GPS loosely coupled system. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 45(1): 125–137.

14.

Liu

Duan

(2014) Adaptive Huber-based Kalman filtering for spacecraft attitude estimation. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 0142331213519358.

15.

Markley

Cheng

Crassidis

(2007) Averaging quaternions. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 30(4): 1193–1196.

16.

Markley

Mortari

(2000) Quaternion attitude estimation using vector observations. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences 48(2): 359–380.

17.

Merwe Rvd (2004) Sigma-point Kalman filters for probabilistic inference in dynamic state-space models. PhD, OGI School of Science & Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

18.

Merwe Rvd, Wan

Julier

(2004) Sigma-point kalman filters for nonlinear estimation and sensor-fusion: applications to integrated navigation. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Conference on Guidance, Navigation, and Control, Providence, RI, pp. 16–19.

19.

Psiaki

(2000) Attitude determination filtering via extended quaternion estimation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 23(2): 273–279.

20.

Shin

(2005) Estimation techniques for low-cost inertial navigation. PhD Department of Geomatics Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Calgary, AB, Canada.

21.

Silson

PMG

(2011) Coarse alignment of a ship’s strapdown inertial attitude reference system using velocity loci. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 60(6): 1930–1941.

22.

Yang

Zhou

Loffeld

(2012) Quaternion-based Kalman Filtering on INS/GPS. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Fusion, Singapore, pp. 511–518.

23.

Zhou

Knedlik

Edwan

(2010) Low-cost INS/GPS with Nonlinear Filtering Methods. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Fusion, Edinburgh, pp. 1–8.

24.

Zhou

(2013) Key technologies in low-cost integrated vehicle navigation systems. PhD Division of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.

Comparison of direct navigation mode and indirect navigation mode for integrated SINS/GPS

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References