Stable flow controllers are usually preferred since, compared with unstable flow controllers, they are less sensitive to any modelling imperfections. ℋ∞-optimal flow controllers involve finite impulse–response (FIR) filters due to the time delays which are inherent in any practical network. Therefore, design of a stable ℋ∞ flow controller is a difficult problem due to the infinite dimensionality of these FIR filters. In this work, finite-dimensional approximations of FIR filters are used to design stable ℋ∞ flow controllers. Three design approaches are considered and, for each approach, a different algorithm to design a stable ℋ∞ flow controller is developed. Controllers obtained by each agorithm are also compared against each other, as well as against the optimal controller, using an example case.
AtaşlarB.2004: Robust Flow Control for Data-communication Networks. PhD Dissertation. Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey, July2004. (In Turkish).
2.
ChengP.CaoY.Y.SunY.2009: Strong γk − γcl ℋ∞ stabilization with a new slack variable approach. Automatica45, 1861–1867.
3.
DullerudG.E.PaganiniF.1999: A Course in Robust Control Theory. Springer.
4.
GahinetP.NemirovskiA.LaubA.J.ChilaliM.1995: LMI Control Toolbox for use with MATLAB. The MathWorks Inc., Natwick, MA.
5.
GümüşsoyS.ÖzbayH.2005: Remarks on strong stabilization and stable ℋ∞ controller design. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control50, 2083–87.
6.
GümüşsoyS.ÖzbayH.2008: Stable ℋ∞controller design for time-delay systems. International Journal of Control81, 546–56.
7.
KimuraH.1996: Chain-Scattering Approach to H∞ Control. Birkhäuser.
8.
LeeP.H.SohY.C.2002: Synthesis of stable ℋ∞ controller via the chain scattering framework. Systems and Control Letters47, 121–27.
9.
LeeP.H.SohY.C.2005: Synthesis of simultaneous stabilizing ℋ∞ controller. International Journal of Control78, 1437–46.
10.
MeinsmaG.MirkinL.2005: ℋ∞ control of systems with multiple I/O delays via decomposition to adobe problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control50, 199–211.
11.
MeinsmaG.ZwartH.2000: On ℋ∞ control for dead-time systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control45, 272–85.
12.
MirkinL.RaskinN.2003: Every stabilizing dead-time controller has an observer-predictor-based structure. Automatica39, 1747–54.
13.
NiculescuS.I.2001: Delay Effects on Stability: A Robust Control Approach. (Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 269). Springer-Verlag.
14.
ÖzbayH.2010: Stable ℋ∞ controller design for systems with time-delays. In: WillemsJ.C.HaraS.OhtaY.FujiokaH., Editors, it Perspectives in Mathematical System Theory, Control, and Signal Processing (Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences), Vol. 398, Springer-Verlag, pp. 105–13.
15.
QuetP.-F.AtaşlarB.İftarA.ÖzbayH.KalyanaramanS.KangT.2002: Rate-based flow controllers for communication networks in the presence of uncertain time-varying multiple time-delays. Automatica38, 917–28.
16.
SandbergI.W.1964: On the L2-boundedness of solutions of nonlinear functional equations. Bell Systems Technical Journal43, 1581–99.
17.
TokerO.ÖzbayH.1995: ℋ∞ optimal and suboptimal controllers for infinite dimensional SISO plants. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control40, 751–55.
18.
TokerO.ÖzbayH.1996: On the rational ℋ∞ controller design for infinite dimensional plants. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control6, 383–97.
19.
ÜnalH.U.2010: ℋ∞ Controller Design for Uncertain Multiple-time-delay Systems. PhD Dissertation. Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey, January2010. http://huunal.home.anadolu.edu.tr/docs/PhD.pdf.
20.
ÜnalH.U.Ataşlar-AyyιldιzB.İftarA.ÖzbayH.2006a: ℋ∞-based Flow Control in Data-communication Networks with Multiple Time-delays. Technical Report. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey, 2006. http://www.mm.anadolu.edu.tr/~altug/tr/tr06001.pdf.
21.
ÜnalH.U.Ataşlar-AyyιldιzB.İftarA.ÖzbayH.2006b: Robust controller design for multiple time-delay systems: the case of data-communication networks. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems. Kyoto, Japan, July 2006, pp. 63–70.
22.
ÜnalH.U.Ataşlar-AyyιldιzB.İftarA.ÖzbayH.2010: Robust flow control in data-communication networks with multiple time-delays. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control20, 1529–48.
23.
ÜnalH.U.İftarA.2008a: A small gain theorem for systems with non-causal subsystems. Automatica44, 2950–53.
24.
ÜnalH.U.İftarA.2008b: Stable ℋ∞ controller design for systems with multiple time-delays: The case of data-communication networks. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC Word Congress. Seoul, Korea, July 2008, pp. 13348–13354.
25.
ÜnalH.U.İftarA.2008c: Utilization of non-causal uncertainty blocks in the robust flow controller design problem for data-communication networks. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, San Antonio, TX, September 2008, pp. 61–66.
26.
ÜnalH.U.İftarA.2009a: Performance of the stable ℋ∞ flow controllers. In Proceedings of the TOK Automatic Control National Meeting. İstanbul, Turkey, October 2009 (in Turkish).
27.
ÜnalH.U.İftarA.2009b: Stable ℋ∞ flow controller design. In Proceedings of the 8th IFAC Workshop on Time-Delay Systems. Sinaia, Romania, September 2009.
28.
VidyasagarM.1985: Control System Synthesis: A Factorization Approach. MIT Press.
29.
ZamesG.1966: On the input-output stability of time-varying nonlinear feedback systems Part I: Conditions derived using concepts of loop gain, conicity, and positivity. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control11, 228–38.
30.
ZerenM.ÖzbayH.2000: On the strong stabilization and stable ℋ∞-controller design problems for MIMO systems. Automatica36, 1675–84.
31.
ZhongQ.C.2006: Robust Control of Time-Delay Systems. Springer-Verlag.
32.
ZhouK.DoyleJ.C.GloverK.1996: Robust and Optimal Control. Prentice Hall.
