In this paper, the caster-and-camber-based reconfiguration of the trafficability metrics of mobile robots is first discussed. The trafficability metrics of the reconfigurable mobile robots, such as the equivalent lateral and longitudinal stability margins with non-linear characteristics, can be built up using the geometrical projection approach. We next propose a modified Harmony Search method to deal with the constrained optimization problems, which is based on the direct handling of the given constraints. It is further applied to obtain the optimal configurable prototypes of a mobile robot.
ApostolopoulosD.1996: Systematic configuration of robotic locomotion. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-96-30. Pittsburgh, PA: The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
2.
CoelloC.A.C.2000: Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems. Computers in Industry41(2), 113–27.
3.
CoelloC.A.C.2002: Constraint-handling in genetic algorithms through the use of dominance-based tournament selection. Advanced Engineering Informatics16(3), 193–203.
4.
DebK.2000: An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering186(2–4), 311–38.
5.
EngelbrechtA.P.2005: Fundamentals of Computational Swarm Intelligence. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
6.
FuY.XuH.MaY.2004: A navigation robot with reconfigurable chassis and bionic wheel. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, August, Shenyang, China.
7.
GeemZ.W.2008: Novel derivative of harmony search algorithm for discrete design variables. Applied Mathematics and Computation199, 223–30.
8.
GeemZ.W.KimJ.H.LoganathanG.V.2001: A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony Search. Simulation76(2), 60–8.
9.
GeemZ.W.KimJ.H.LoganathanG.V.2002: Harmony search optimization: application to pipe network design. International Journal of Modeling and Simulation22(2), 125–33.
10.
GeorgesG.LaurenceB.1992: The French planetary rover VAP: concept and current developments. Proceedings of the IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, July, Raleigh, NC, 1391–8.
11.
KangS.L.GeemZ.W.2004: A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Computers and Structures82(9–10), 781–98.
12.
KubotaT.KurodaY.KuniiY.1999: Micro planetary rover “Micro5”. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, Noordwijk, Netherlands, 373–8.
13.
LeeK.S.GeemZ.W.2005: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering194(36–38), 3902–22.
14.
MahdaviM.FesangharyM.DamangirE.2007: An improved harmony search algorithm for solving optimization problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation188(2), 1567–79.
MukhopadhyayA.RoyA.DasS.DasS.AbrahamA.2008: Population-variance and explorative power of harmony search: an analysis. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Information Management, November, London, 775–81.
PoliR.LangdonW.B.2002: Foundations of Genetic Programming. Springer.
21.
ShigeoH.1999: Super-mechano-colony and SMC rover with detachable wheel units. Proceedings of the COE Workshop, 67–72.
22.
XuH.ZhangZ.TanD.GaoX.Z.PengG.YuS.2008: Optimization of mobile robot based on projection method and harmony search. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, August, Bangkok, Thailand.
