This article contributes to the discussion of soil degradation from the perspective of ecological biblical hermeneutics. It characterizes the interrelationship of human and more-than-human creation, particularly the various kinds of soils, in Mt. 13.1–9 through the lens of subalternity and symbiotic interrelationship. While the original application of subalternity was primarily focused on humans, its use was expanded by including the subordinated (subaltern) pair in traditional binaries: human/animal, culture/nature, and subject/object. This paper holds that the various kinds of soils, regarded as subalterns in this parable, are active characters in warning about soil degradation. They also hint at how they collaborate with more-than-human characters towards the lengthy process of soil regeneration and sustainability amidst the extractive agriculture in Roman-colonized Galilee. This ecological biblical reading of the parable contributes to ecological education to help achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 15: Life on Land amid eco-critical times.
ArcariPaula. 2019‘“Dynamic” Non-Human Animals in Theories of Practice: Views from the Subaltern’, in MallerCecilyStrengersYolande (eds.), Social Practices and Dynamic Non-Humans: Nature, Materials and Technologies (Cham: Springer International Publishing): 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92189-1_4.
2.
BaerSara G.BirgeHannah E.2018‘Soil Ecosystem Services: An Overview’, in ReicoskyDon (ed.), Managing Soil Health for Sustainable Agriculture, 1. Cambridge: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing): 17–38.
3.
BalabanskiVicky. 2000‘An Earth Bible Reading of the Lord’s Prayer: Matthew 6.9-13’, in HabelNorman C. (ed.), Readings from the Perspective of Earth (The Earth Bible 1; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press): 151–61.
4.
BridgesE. M.OldemanL. R.2001 ‘Food Production and Environmental Degradation’, in BridgesE. Michael (eds.), Response to Land Degradation (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press): 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429187957-5.
5.
CarterWarren. 1999 ‘Contested Claims: Roman Imperial Theology and Matthew’s Gospel’, Biblical Theology Bulletin29 (2): 54–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/014610799902900202.
6.
CarterWarren. 2001Matthew and Empire: Initial Explorations. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity.
7.
CarterWarren. 2006The Roman Empire and the New Testament: An Essential Guide. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.
8.
ConradieErnst. 2004 ‘Towards An Ecological Biblical Hermeneutics: A Review Essay on the Earth Bible Project’, Scriptura85:123–35.
9.
CoxheadIan. 2000 ‘Consequences of a Food Security Strategy for Economic Welfare, Income Distribution and Land Degradation: The Philippine Case’, World Development28 (1): 111–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00117-5.
10.
DavidsonSteed Vernyl. 2017Writing/Reading the Bible in Postcolonial Perspective (Leiden: Brill).
11.
DoddC. H.1961The Parables of the Kingdom (Digswell Place: Nisbet).
12.
DonahueJohn R.1988The Gospel in Parable: Metaphor, Narrative, and Theology in the Synoptic Gospels (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress).
13.
DubeMusa W.2000Postcolonial Feminist Interpretation of the Bible (Saint Louis, MO: Chalice Press).
14.
EckErnest van. 2014 ‘The Harvest and the Kingdom: An Interpretation of the Sower (Mk 4:3b-8) as a Parable of Jesus the Galilean’, HTS Theological Studies70 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V70I1.2715.
15.
ElsberndMaryBieringerReimund2010‘The Ecological Crisis and the Future of Creation’, in BieringerReimundElsberndMary (eds.), Normativity of the Future: Reading Biblical and Other Authoritative Texts in an Eschatological Perspective (Annua Nuntia Lovaniensia, 61; Leuven: Peeters): 281–95.
FoleyA.2015 ‘Seeds of Roman Galilee: A Preliminary Archaeobotanical Analysis of Huqoq, Israel | Semantic Scholar’, The Spectrum: A Scholars Day Journal3 (Article 5): 1–23.
FreyneSean. 1998Galilee: From Alexander the Great to Hadrian 323 BCE to 135 CE: A Study of Second Temple Judaism (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).
20.
FriesenSteven J.2004 ‘Poverty in Pauline Studies: Beyond the So-Called New Consensus’, JSNT26 (3): 323–61.
21.
GilMoshe. 2006 ‘The Decline of the Agrarian Economy in Palestine under Roman Rule’, JESHO49 (3): 285–328.
22.
HabelNorman C.2000‘Introducing the Earth Bible’. in HabelNorman C. (ed.), Readings from the Perspective of Earth (The Earth Bible 1; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press): 25–37.
23.
HabelNorman C., and Earth Bible Team, eds. 2000‘Guiding Ecojustice Principles’, in HabelNorman C. and Earth Bible Team, (eds.), Readings from the Perspective of Earth (The Earth Bible 1; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press): 38–53.
24.
HamelGildas. 1990Poverty and Charity in Roman Palestine, First Three Centuries C.E. Near Eastern Studies 23 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
25.
HarperKyle. 2017The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
26.
HillelDaniel. 2006The Natural History of the Bible: An Environmental Exploration of the Hebrew Scriptures (New York, NY: Columbia University Press).
27.
HorrellDavid G.2010The Bible and the Environment: Towards a Critical Ecological Biblical Theology (Durham: Acumen).
28.
HorrellDavid G.HuntCherrylSouthgateChristopher. 2008 ‘Appeals to the Bible in Ecotheology and Environmental Ethics: A Typology of Hermeneutical Instances’, SCE21:219–38.
29.
HossainAkbar, et al. 2020‘Agricultural Land Degradation: Processes and Problems Undermining Future Food Security’, in FahadShahet al (eds.). Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth (Cham: Springer International Publishing): 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49732-3_2.
30.
HughesJ. Donald. 2014Environmental Problems of the Greeks and Romans (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press). https://doi.org/10.56021/9781421412108.
31.
IbitaMa. Maricel S.2020 ‘The Great Flood in Genesis 6–9: An Ecological Reading of the J and P Traditions’, BTB50 (2): 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146107920913791.
32.
JensenMorten. 2012 ‘Climate, Droughts, Wars, and Famines in Galilee as a Background for Understanding the Historical Jesus’, JBL131 (2): 307–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/23488227.
33.
KloppenborgJohn. 2008 ‘The Growth and Impact of Agricultural Tenancy in Jewish Palestine (III BCE-I CE)’, JESHO51 (1): 31–66. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852008X287549.
34.
KohlPhilip L.1998 ‘Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past’, Annual Review of Anthropology27:223–46.
35.
LongeneckerBruce W.2009 ‘Exposing the Economic Middle: A Revised Economy Scale for the Study of Early Urban Christianity’, JSNT31 (3): 243–78.
36.
MarlowHilary. 2009Biblical Prophets and Contemporary Environmental Ethics: Re-reading Amos, Hosea and First Isaiah (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
37.
MatosPriscila Silva, et al. 2021 ‘Beneficial Services of Glomalin and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Degraded Soils in Brazil’, Scientia Agricola79 (September): e20210064. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2021-0064.
NilsenTina DykesteenSolevågAnna Rebecca. 2016 ‘Expanding Ecological Hermeneutics: The Case for Ecolonialism’. JBL135 (4): 665–83. https://doi.org/10.1353/jbl.2016.0041.
41.
PatteDaniel. 1987The Gospel of Matthew: A Contextual Introduction for Group Study. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.
42.
PeskowitzMiriam. 1997Spinning Fantasies: Rabbis, Gender, and History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
PoliquitDerby E., et al. 2021 ‘Overfarming and Land Degradation Philippines’, Journal of the Austrian Society of Agricultural Economics17 (3): 421–31.
PowellMark Allan. 1991What Is Narrative Criticism? (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress).
46.
RawseaL. H.2021Parables as a Mode of Agrarian-Resistance: Dynamics of God’s Reign and the Subalterns in Mark’s Gospel. Biblical Hermeneutics Rediscovered 39. (Delhi: Christian World Imprints).
SafraiZe’Ev. 1994The Economy of Roman Palestine (London/New York, NY: Routledge).
49.
SafraiZe’Ev. 2010‘Agriculture and Farming’, in HezserCatherine (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Daily Life in Roman Palestine (New York, NY: Oxford University Press): 247–63.
50.
SaljnikovElmira, et al. 2022 ‘Understanding Soils: Their Functions, Use and Degradation’, in SaljnikovElmiraet al (eds.), Advances in Understanding Soil Degradation (Innovations in Landscape Research; Cham: Springer International Publishing): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85682-3_1.
51.
SchottroffLuise. 2006The Parables of Jesus (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress).
SivertsevAlexei. 2010‘The Household Economy’, in HezserCatherine (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Daily Life in Roman Palestine (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 229–45.
54.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. n.d. ‘THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development’. Sustainable Development: The 17 Goals. Accessed May 19, 2021. https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
