This article re-examines the argument from name popularity appearing in the ‘Palestinian Jewish Names’ chapter of Richard Bauckham’s Jesus and the Eyewitnesses in light of patterns of the name popularity found in extra-biblical texts. Bauckham postulates that if Gospels-Acts contained named characters invented in the process of anonymous community transmission, the statistical distribution of name popularity in Gospels-Acts would not align well with the distribution in the ancient Palestinian Jewish population, particularly if the invention took place in the Diaspora. We test this by analyzing the name popularity in two corpora of texts that contain many recognizably fictitious first-century Palestinian Jewish characters, namely a corpus of Christian extra-biblical works consisting of the Clementine Homilies, the Acts of Pilate, and Solomon of Bosra’s Book of the Bee, and the corpus of the Babylonian Talmud. Contra Bauckham, name popularity distributions in these two corpora do not correspond to the distribution among first-century Palestinian Jews statistically significantly worse than the distribution in Gospels-Acts. Moreover, the two corpora paradoxically align better in some respects because they do not exhibit a disproportional representation of specific names observed in Gospels-Acts.
AhuviaMike2020 ‘Jewish Towns and Neighborhoods in Roman Palestine and Persian Babylonia’, in Koltun-FrommN.KesslerG. (eds.), A Companion to Late Ancient Jews and Judaism: Third Century BCE To Seventh Century CE (Hoboken: Wiley): 33–52.
2.
BartholomewCraig G.2013Introducing Biblical Hermeneutics: A Comprehensive Framework for Hearing God in Scripture (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic).
3.
BauckhamRichard2016 ‘The General and the Particular in Memory: A Critique of Dale Allison’s Approach to the Historical Jesus’, JSHJ14.1: 28–51.
4.
BauckhamRichard2017Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony (2nd ed.; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
5.
BeDuhnJason2013The First New Testament. Marcion’s Scriptural Canon (Salem: Polebridge Press).
6.
BeiderAlexander2012 ‘Discontinuity of Jewish Naming Traditions’, International Review of Jewish Genealogy24(2): 43–53.
7.
BudgeErnest A. Wallis1886The Book of the Bee: The Syriac Text Edited from the Manuscripts in London, Oxford, and Munich (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
8.
ByrskogSamuel2008 ‘The Eyewitnesses as Interpreters of the Past: Reflections on Richard Bauckham’sJesus and the Eyewitnesses’, JSHJ6: 157–68.
9.
CatchpoleDavid2008 ‘On Proving Too Much: Critical Hesitations about Richard Bauckham’sJesus and the Eyewitnesses’, JSHJ6: 169–81.
10.
CollinsJohn N.2010 ‘Re-thinking “Eyewitnesses” in the Light of “Servants of the Word” (Luke 1: 2)’, ExpTim121: 447–52.
11.
CrossleyJames G.2012a ‘Can John’s Gospel Really Be Used to Reconstruct a Life of Jesus? An Assessment of Recent Trends and a Defence of a Traditional View’, in ThompsonT. L.VerennaT. S. (eds.), Is This Not the Carpenter? The Question of the Historicity of the Figure of Jesus (London: Routledge): 163–84.
12.
CrossleyJames G.2012b Jesus in an Age of Neoliberalism: Quests, Scholarship and Ideology (London: Routledge).
13.
De StryckerÉmile1961La forme la plus ancienne du Protévangile de Jacques: Recherches sur le papyrus Bodmer 5 avec une édition critique du texte grec et une traduction annotée (Bruxelles: Société des Bollandistes).
14.
DunnJames D. G.2008 ‘Eyewitnesses and the Oral Jesus Tradition’, JSHJ6: 85–105.
EvansCraig A.2008 ‘The Implications of Eyewitness Tradition’, JSNT31: 211–19.
17.
EveEric2014Behind the Gospels: Understanding the Oral Tradition (London: SPCK).
18.
FeuervergerAndrey2008 ‘Statistical Analysis of an Archeological Find’, Annals of Applied Statistics2: 3–54.
19.
FeuervergerAndrey2013 ‘The Tomb Next Door: An Update to “Statistical Analysis of an Archeological Find”’, Annals of Applied Statistics7: 2081–2105.
20.
FienbergStephen E.2008 ‘Statistics and the “Lost Tomb of Jesus”’, Annals of Applied Statistics2: 1–2.
21.
FosterPaul2007 ‘The Jesus of Testimony: Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006. £18.99/$32.00. pp. xiii+538. ISBN: 0-8028-3162-1)’, ExpTim118: 493–94.
22.
FosterPaul2012 ‘Memory, Orality, and the Fourth Gospel: Three Dead-Ends in Historical Jesus Research’, JSHJ10: 191–227.
23.
FuchsCamil2013 ‘Names, Statistics, and the “Jesus Family” Tomb Site’, in CharlesworthJ. H. (ed.), The Tomb of Jesus and his Family? Exploring Ancient Jewish Tombs Near Jerusalem’s Walls (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans): 375–98.
GregorKamilBlaisBrian2023b ‘Is Name Popularity a Good Test of Historicity? A Statistical Evaluation of Richard Bauckham’s Onomastic Argument’, JSHS21: 171–202.
26.
GrochowskiZbigniew2020 ‘Nicodemus. A Disciple Liberated by the Cross of the Christ from the Darkness of Fear and Disbelief’, The Biblical Annals10: 637–76.
27.
HarnackAdolf1924Marcion: Das Evangelium vom fremden Gott (Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs).
28.
HolderRodney D.2020Ramified Natural Theology in Science and Religion: Moving Forward from Natural Theology (London: Routledge).
29.
IlanTal2002Lexicon of Jewish Names in Late Antiquity: Part I, Palestine 330 BCE–200 CE (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
30.
KirkAlan2017 ‘Ehrman, Bauckham and Bird on Memory and the Jesus Tradition’, JSHJ15: 88–114.
31.
KirkAlan2018Memory and the Jesus Tradition (Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
32.
KloppenborgJohn S.2012 ‘Memory, Performance, and the Sayings of Jesus’, JSHJ10: 97–132.
33.
LapinHayim2011 ‘Epigraphical Rabbis: A Reconsideration’, JQR101: 311–46.
LoweMalcolm1981 ‘Ἰουδαῖοι of the Apocrypha. Fresh Approach to the Gospels of James, Pseudo-Thomas, Peter and Nicodemus’, NovT23.1: 56–90.
36.
MatthewsChristopher R.2002Philip. Apostle and Evangelist: Configurations of a Tradition (Leiden: Brill).
37.
McDowellSean2016The Fate of the Apostles: Examining the Martyrdom Accounts of the Closest Followers of Jesus (London: Routledge).
38.
MillarFergus2011 ‘Inscriptions, Synagogues and Rabbis in Late Antique Palestine’, JSJ42: 253–77.
39.
PattersonStephen J.2008 ‘Can You Trust a Gospel? A Review of Richard Bauckham’sJesus and the Eyewitnesses’, JSHJ6: 194–210.
40.
RastoinMarc2021 ‘Cleophas (Lc 24, 18): un indice de la creativite litteraire et theologique de Luc?’ NTS67.1: 22–37.
41.
RothDieter T.2015The Text of Marcion’s Gospel (Leiden: Brill).
42.
SchröterJens2008 ‘The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony? A Critical Examination of Richard Bauckham’sJesus and the Eyewitnesses’, JSNT31: 195–209.
43.
ShawAlistair N.2019Oral Transmission and the Dream Narratives of Matthew 1–2: An Exploration of Matthean Culture Using Memory Techniques (Eugene: Pickwick).
44.
StricklandMichael2014 ‘What’s in a Name? Richard Bauckham, First-Century Palestinian Jewish Names, and theProtoevangelium of James’, American Theological Inquiry7(2): 35–42.
45.
ThateMichael J.2013Remembrance of Things Past? (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
46.
van de WegheLuuk2023 ‘Name Recall in the Synoptic Gospels’, NTS69: 95–109.
47.
von TischendorfConstantin1853Evangelia Apocrypha, Adhibitis Plurimis Codicibus Graecis et Latinis Maximam Partem Nunc Primum Consultis Atque Ineditorum Copia Insignibus, Edidit Constantinus Tischendorf (Leipzig: Avenarius & Mendelssohn).
48.
TrippJeffrey M.2019Direct Internal Quotation in the Gospel of John (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
49.
TrippJeffrey M.2022 ‘The Eyewitnesses in their Own Words: Testing Richard Bauckham’s Model Using Verifiable Quotations’, JSNT44: 411–34.
50.
WeedenTheodore J.Sr. 2008 ‘Polemics as a Case for Dissent: A Response to Richard Bauckham’sJesus and the Eyewitnesses’, JSHJ6: 211–24.
51.
WilsonBenjamin R.2018 ‘Jew–Gentile Relations and the Geographic Movement of Acts 10: 1–11: 18’, CBQ80: 81–96.
