Prior to the publication of 46 (P.Beatty II; LDAB 3011), at Heb. 11.37 the earlier critical editions printed one of the longer readings, though from Erasmus onwards the passage was subject to a considerable number of conjectural emendations. With 46, the evidence for the reading ἐπρίσθησαν gained significant early manuscript support, thus impacting subsequent editorial practice and textual analysis. This study offers a reinvestigation of this textual problem and brings a new proposal based on a fresh evaluation of external and internal criteria.
AlandKurtBenduhn-MertzAnnetteMinkGerdBachmannHorst1991Text und Textwert der griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments. II.4. Die Paulinischen Briefe: Kolosserbrief bis Hebräerbrief (ANTF; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
2.
AttridgeHarold W.1989A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
3.
BruceF.F.1964Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews: The English Text with Introduction, Exposition, and Notes (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
4.
BuchananGeorge W.1972To the Hebrews (AB; New York: Doubleday).
5.
ColwellErnest C.1969‘Method in Evaluating Scribal Habits: A Study of 45, 66, 75’, in Studies in Methodology in Textual Criticism of the New Testament (NTTS; Leiden: Brill): 106-24.
EppEldon Jay1989‘The New Testament Papyrus Manuscripts in Historical Perspective’, in HorganMaurya P.KobelskiPaul. J (eds.), To Touch the Text: Biblical and Related Studies in Honor of Joseph A.Fitzmyer, S.J. (New York: Crossroad.): 261-88.
8.
ErasmusDesiderius1522Des. Erasmi Roterodami In Nouum Testamentum ab eodem tertio recognitum, annotationes, item ab ipso recognitae, et auctario neutiqam poenitendi locupletatae (Basel: Johann Froben).
9.
FeeGordon D.MullenRoderic L.2013‘The Use of the Greek Fathers for New Testament Textual Criticism’, in EhrmanBart D.HolmesMichael W. (eds.), The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis (2nd edn; NTTSD; Leiden: Brill): 351-73.
10.
GrässerErich1990–97An die Hebräer (3 vols.; EKKNT; Zürich: Benziger Verlag).
11.
GreethamD.C.1994Textual Scholarship: An Introduction (Garland Reference Library of the Humanities; New York: Garland).
12.
HavetLouis1911Manuel de critique verbale appliquée aux textes latins (Paris: Hachette).
13.
HeadPeter M.WarrenM.1997‘Re-Inking the Pen: Evidence from P.Oxy. 657 (13) Concerning Unintentional Scribal Errors’, NTS43: 463-73.
14.
HillCharles E.2012‘“In These Very Words”: Methods and Standards of Literary Borrowing in the Second Century’, in HillCharles E.KrugerMichael J. (eds.), The Early Text of the New Testament (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 261-81.
15.
JongkindDirk2017The Greek New Testament, Produced at Tyndale House (Wheaton, IL: Crossway).
16.
KoesterCraig R.2001Hebrews: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB; New York: Yale University Press).
17.
MalikPeter2017P.Beatty III (47): The Codex, Its Scribe, and Its Text (NTTSD; Leiden: Brill).
18.
MalikPeter2022‘On Citing the Sahidic Version of Hebrews: Theoretical Reflections and Examples from Textual Practice’, NTS68: 61-75.
19.
MetzgerBruce M.1994A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament (2nd edn; London: United Bible Societies).
20.
MetzgerBruce M.EhrmanBart D.2005The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration (4th edn; New York: Oxford University Press).
21.
MoffattJames1924Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
22.
ReynoldsL.D.WilsonN.G.1991Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature (3rd edn; Oxford: Clarendon Press).
23.
RoyseJames R.1983‘The Treatment of Scribal Leaps in Metzger’sTextual Commentary’, NTS29: 539-51.
24.
RoyseJames R.2008Scribal Habits in Early Greek New Testament Papyri (NTTSD; Leiden: Brill).
25.
RoyseJames R.2012‘The Early Text of Paul (and Hebrews)’, in HillCharles E.KrugerMichael J. (eds.), The Early Text of the New Testament (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 175-203.
26.
TovEmanuel2011Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible (3rd revised and expanded edn; Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
27.
WachtelKlausWitteKlaus1994Das Neue Testament auf Papyrus. II.2. Die paulinischen Briefe: Gal, Eph, Phil, Kol, 1 u. 2 Thess, 1 u. 2 Tim, Tit, Phlm, Hebr (ANT; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
28.
WassermanTommy2015‘Historical and Philological Correlations and the CBGM as Applied to Mark 1:1’, TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism20: 1-11.
29.
WeissBernhard1896Textkritik der paulinischen Briefe (TU; Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs).
30.
WeissHans-Friedrich1991Der Brief an die Hebräer: Übersetzt und erklärt (KEKNT; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
31.
WestcottBrooke FossHortFenton John Anthony1890The New Testament in the Original Greek. I. Text; II. Introduction; Appendix (2nd edn; Cambridge: Macmillan).
32.
ZuntzGünther1953The Text of the Epistles: A Disquisition upon the Corpus Paulinum (The Schweich Lectures 1946; London: The British Academy).
