Whereas scholars’ methodological assumptions about NT texts’ evocation of Israel’s scripture vary, the plausibility and significance of multivalent allusions need to be examined. The ecce homo statement in the Pilate trial (Jn 19.5) is an apt case for this examination. This study exercises a literary analysis of both proposed allusions – to Zech. 6.12 and 1 Sam. 9.17 – and shows that they are based on a common deeper structure despite the difference in phraseological conformity and historical and literary settings. This deeper structure, functioning like a masterplot, has a simple story form of God’s kingship that consists of his contention with dishonoring hostility and the subsequent building of his temple/dwelling place. This story form, captured in the Song of Moses (Exod. 15) and undergirding the Zechariah sign-act (6.9-15) and Saul’s kingship establishment story (1 Sam. 9), reveals that even in the trial scene Jesus is paradoxically enthroned and building the eschatological temple.
AbbottH.P.2002The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
2.
BarrettC.K.1978The Gospel According to St. John: An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text (2nd edn; Philadelphia: Westminster Press).
HalpernB.1981The Constitution of the Monarchy in Israel (HSM, 25; Chico, CA: Scholars Press).
20.
HaysR.B.1989Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
21.
HylenS.2005Allusion and Meaning in John 6 (BZNW, 137; Berlin: de Gruyter).
22.
KeenerC.S.2012The Gospel of John (2 vols.; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).
23.
KeesmaatS.C.1999Paul and his Story: (Re)Interpreting the Exodus Tradition (JSNTSup, 181; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).
24.
KöstenbergerA.J.2004John (BECNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).
25.
LefebvreP.2002 ‘Riçpah, la dame du Lithostroton (2 Sam XXI; Jn XIX)’, RB 109.2: 217-40.
26.
LiermanJ.2006 ‘The Mosaic Pattern of John’s Christology’, in LiermanJ. (ed), Challenging Perspectives on the Gospel of John (WUNT, 2/219; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 210-34.
27.
LitwakK.D.2005Echoes of Scripture in Luke–Acts: Telling the History of God’s People Intertextually (JSNTSup, 282; London: T&T Clark).
28.
LoewenstammS.E.1992The Evolution of the Exodus Tradition (Jerusalem: Magnes Press).
29.
LongeneckerR.N.1999Biblical Exegesis in the Apostolic Period (2nd edn; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
30.
MacRaeG.W.1973 ‘Theology and Irony in the Fourth Gospel’, in CliffordR.J.MacRaeG.W. (eds.), The Word in the World: Essays in Honor of Frederick L. Moriarty (Cambridge, MA: Weston College Press): 83-96.
31.
MagneJ.1998 ‘Jésus devant Pilate’, RB 105.1: 42-69.
32.
ManningG.T.2004Echoes of a Prophet: The Use of Ezekiel in the Gospel of John and in Literature of the Second Temple Period (JSNTSup, 270; London: T&T Clark).
33.
McComiskeyT.E.1998 ‘Zechariah’, in McComiskeyT.E. (ed.), The Minor Prophets: An Exegetical and Expository Commentary. III. Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic): 1003-244.
34.
MeeksW.A.1976The Prophet-King: Moses Traditions and the Johannine Christology (NovTSup, 14; Leiden: Brill).
35.
MenkenM.J.J.1996Old Testament Quotations in the Fourth Gospel: Studies in Textual Form (CBET, 15; Kampen: Kok Pharos).
36.
MeyersC.L.MeyersE.M.1987Haggai, Zechariah 1–8 (AB, 25B; Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
37.
MoloneyF.J.1976The Johannine Son of Man (Rome: LAS).
38.
PfitznerV.C.1997 ‘The Coronation of the King: The Passion in the Gospel of John’, CurTM 4.1: 10-21.
39.
PiperR.A.2007 ‘The Characterization of Pilate and the Death of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel’, in Van BelleG. (ed.), The Death of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel (BETL, 200; Leuven: Leuven University Press): 121-62.
40.
ResseguieJ.L.2005Narrative Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).
41.
RiffaterreM.1983Text Production (trans. LyonsT.; New York: Columbia University Press).
42.
RykenL., et al. (eds.) 1998Dictionary of Biblical Imagery (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press).
43.
SchnackenburgR.1975Das Johannesevangelium. III. Teil (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder).
44.
SeniorD.1991The Passion of Jesus in the Gospel of John (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press).
45.
ShinW.G.2016 ‘The “Exodus” in Jerusalem (Luke 9:31): A Lukan Form of Israel’s Restoration Hope’ (PhD Thesis, Fuller Theological Seminary).
46.
ShinW.G.2018 ‘Integrated Stories and Israel’s Contested Worship Space: Exod 15.17 and Stephen’s Retelling of Heilsgeschichte (Acts 7)’, NTS 64.4: 495-13.
47.
SödingT.1996 ‘Die Macht der Wahrheit und das Reich der Freiheit: Zur johanneischen Deutung des Pilatus-Prozesses (Joh 18,28–19,16)’, ZTK 93.1: 35-58.
48.
SödingT.2017 ‘Ecce homo: Die johanneische Ikone des Menschen’, ZTK 114.2: 119-37.
49.
ThompsonM.M.1988The Humanity of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
