This article explores ancient and modern reflection on inference generation and its implications for potential audience inferences concerning the Markan Jesus and whether he drinks the wine the bystander offers him while crucified (15.36). By examining this logical possibility from the perspective of hearing, rather than silent reading, this article sets forth previously underappreciated evidence that Mark’s narrative is intentionally vague at this point, prompting listeners to decide the matter for themselves. Moreover, I argue that the flow and rhetoric of the narrative both suggest that hearers were meant to infer that Jesus does indeed drink – and in so doing enjoy an ironic foretaste of Mark’s vision for the kingdom of God.
AuerbachErich1953Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (trans. TraskWilliam R.; Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
2.
AuneDavid E1987The New Testament in its Literary Environment (Philadelphia: Westminster Press).
3.
BauckhamRichard1998 ‘John for Readers of Mark’, in BauckhamRichard (ed.), The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans): 147-71.
4.
BeavisMary Ann2011Mark (Paideia; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).
BlackJohn B.BowerGordon H.1980 ‘Story Understanding as Problem-Solving’, Poetics9: 223-50.
7.
BoomershineThomas E.2015The Messiah of Peace: A Performance-Criticism Commentary on Mark’s Passion-Resurrection Narrative (Biblical Performance Criticism; Eugene, OR: Cascade).
8.
BordwellDavid1985Narration in the Fiction Film (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).
9.
BoringM. Eugene2006Mark: A Commentary (NTL; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
10.
BortolussiMarisaDixonPeter2003Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
11.
BraniganEdward1992Narrative Comprehension and Film (London: Routledge).
12.
BroekPaul van denBekerKatinkaOudegaMarja2015 ‘Inference Generation in Text Comprehension: Automatic and Strategic Processes in the Construction of a Mental Representation’, in O’BrienEdward J.CookAnne E.LorchRobert F.Jr (eds.), Inferences during Reading (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 94-121.
13.
BroekPaul van denPerfettiCharles A.StafuraJoseph Z.2015 ‘Comprehending Implicit Meanings in Text without Making Inferences’, in O’BrienEdward J.CookAnne E.LorchRobert F.Jr (eds.), Inferences during Reading (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 1-18.
14.
BrownRaymond E.1994The Death of the Messiah: From Gethsemane to the Grave, a Commentary on the Passion Narratives in the Four Gospels (New York: Doubleday).
Camery-HoggattJerry1992Irony in Mark’s Gospel: Text and Subtext (SNTSMS, 72; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
17.
CookAnne E.LimberJohn E.O’BrienEdward J.2001 ‘Situation-Based Context and the Availability of Predictive Inferences’, Journal of Memory and Language44: 220-34.
18.
CookAnne E.O’BrienEdward J.2015 ‘Passive Activation and Instantiation of Inferences during Reading’, in O’BrienEdward J.CookAnne E.LorchRobert F.Jr (eds.), Inferences during Reading (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 19-41.
19.
CribioreRaffaella2001Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
20.
CroftWilliamCruseD. Alan2004Cognitive Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
21.
CulpeperJonathan1996 ‘Inferring Character from Texts: Attribution Theory and Foregrounding Theory’, Poetics23: 335-61.
22.
CulpeperJonathan2009 ‘Reflections on a Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Characterisation’, in BrôneGeertVandaeleJeroen (eds.), Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps (Berlin: de Gruyter): 125-60.
23.
DeckerRodney J.2014Mark 9–16: A Handbook on the Greek Text (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press).
24.
EvansCraig A.2001Mark 8:27–16:20 (WBC, 34B; Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson).
25.
FocantCamille2012The Gospel According to Mark: A Commentary (trans. Leslie R. Keylock. Eugene, OR: Pickwick).
26.
FortenbaughWilliam W.HubyPamela M.SharplesRobert W.GutasDimitri (eds.) 1992Theophrastus of Eresus, Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, Text and Translation (2 vols.; Leiden: Brill).
27.
FowlerRobert M.1996Let the Reader Understand: Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International).
28.
GeorgiaAllan T.2013 ‘Translating the Triumph: Reading Mark’s Crucifixion Narrative against a Roman Ritual of Power’, JSNT 36.1: 17-38.
29.
GernsbacherMorton AnnFaustMark1995 ‘Skilled Suppression’, in DempsterF.N.BrainerdC.N. (eds.), Interference and Inhibition in Cognition (San Diego, CA: Academic Press): 295-327.
30.
GernsbacherMortonKaschakMichael P.2013 ‘Text Comprehension’, in Daniel Reisberg
(ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 462-74.
31.
GerrigRichard J.1993Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
32.
GilbertDaniel T.1989 ‘Thinking Lightly about Others: Automatic Components of the Social Inference Process’, in UlemanJames S.BarghJohn A. (eds.), Unintended Thought: Limits of Awareness, Intention, and Control (New York: Guilford): 189-211.
33.
GilchrestEric J.2013Revelation 21–22 in Light of Jewish and Greco-Roman Utopianism (BIS, 118; Leiden: Brill).
34.
HartvigsenKirsten Marie2012Prepare the Way of the Lord: Towards a Cognitive Poetic Analysis of Audience Involvement with Characters and Events in the Markan World (BZNW, 180; Berlin: de Gruyter).
35.
HoganPatrick C.2003Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists (New York: Routledge).
36.
HurtadoLarry W.1983Mark (New York: Harper & Row).
37.
HurtadoLarry W.2014 ‘Oral Fixation and New Testament Studies? “Orality”, “Performance” and Reading Texts in Early Christianity’, NTS60: 321-40.
38.
IerselBas M.F. van1998Mark: A Reader-Response Commentary (LNTS, 164; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).
39.
IversonKelly R.2011 ‘“Wherever the Gospel is Preached”: The Paradox of Secrecy in the Gospel of Mark’, in IversonKelly R.SkinnerChristopher W. (eds.), Mark as Story: Retrospect and Prospect (Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature): 181-209.
40.
IversonKelly R.2016 ‘Oral Fixation or Oral Corrective? A Response to Larry Hurtado’, NTS60: 183-200.
41.
JuelDonald1990Mark (Minneapolis: Augsburg).
42.
KermodeFrank1979The Genesis of Secrecy: On the Interpretation of Narrative (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
43.
MacLeanPaul D.1990The Triune Brain in Evolution: Role in Paleocerebral Functions (New York: Plenum).
44.
MarcusJoel2006 ‘Crucifixion as Parodic Exaltation’, JBL125: 73-87.
45.
MarcusJoel2009Mark 8–16: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB, 27A; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
46.
MaxwellKathy Reiko2010Hearing between the Lines: The Audience as Fellow-Workers in Luke–Acts and its Literary Milieu (LNTS, 425; London: T&T Clark).
47.
McKoonGail,
RatcliffRoger1992 ‘Inference during Reading’, Psychological Review99: 440-66.
48.
MerenlahtiPetri2005Poetics for the Gospels?: Rethinking Narrative Criticism (New York: Continuum).
49.
MoloneyFrancis J.2002The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
50.
MorganTeresa1998Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
51.
OlsonDavid R.1996The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
52.
ParsonsMikeal C.2003 ‘Luke and the Progymnasmata: A Preliminary Investigation into the Preliminary Exercises’, in PennerTodd C.SticheleCaroline Vander (eds.), Contextualizing Acts: Lukan Narrative and Greco-Roman Discourse (SBLSymS, 20; Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature): 43-63.
53.
PinkerSteven2007The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language (New York: Harper).
54.
PinkerSteven2009How the Mind Works (New York: Norton).
55.
PulvermüllerFriedemannHaukOlafNikulinVadim V.IlmoniemiRisto J.2005 ‘Functional Links between Motor and Language Systems’, European Journal of Neuroscience21: 793-97.
56.
RubinDavid C.1995Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-out Rhymes (New York: Oxford University Press).
57.
SchmidtThomas E.1995 ‘Mark 15.16-32: The Crucifixion Narrative and the Roman Triumphal Procession’, NTS41: 1-18.
58.
SternbergMeir1985The Poetics of Biblical Narrative: Ideological Literature and the Drama of Reading (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
59.
VegaManuel de2015 ‘Toward an Embodied Approach to Inferences in Comprehension: The Case of Action Language’, in O’BrienEdward J.CookAnne E.LorchRobert F.Jr (eds.), Inferences during Reading (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 182-209.
60.
WhitentonMichael R.2017Hearing Kyriotic Sonship: A Cognitive and Rhetorical Approach to the Characterization of Mark’s Jesus (BIS, 148; Leiden: Brill).
61.
WolmanClaraBroekPaul van denLorchRobert F.1997 ‘Effects of Causal Structure on Immediate and Delayed Story Recall by Children with Mild Mental Retardation, Children with Learning Disabilities, and Children without Disabilities’, The Journal of Special Education30: 439-55.
62.
Yarbro CollinsAdela2007Mark: A Commentary (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
