This is a review article on John M.G. Barclay, Paul and the Gift (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015) that critically examines the methodological choice to study āperfectionsā (as conceptualized by Kenneth Burke) of the gift, asking both about how this works to provide a taxonomy of ancient Mediterranean views, and how it fits the argument of Paulās letter to the Galatians. Concluding thoughts are offered about the implications of John Barclayās reading of Paul, both in terms of Paulās situation within his own time and in terms of contemporary theology.
MeeksWayne A.FitzgeraldJohn T. (eds.) 2007The Writings of St. Paul: Annotated Texts, Reception and Criticism (2nd edn; Boston: W.W. Norton).
9.
MitchellMargaret M.1994āRhetorical Shorthand in Pauline Argumentation: The Functions of āThe Gospelā in the Corinthian Correspondenceā, in JervisL.A.RichardsonP. (eds.), Gospel in Paul: Studies on Corinthians, Galatians and Romans for Richard N. Longenecker (JSNTSup, 108; Shefļ¬eld: Shefļ¬eld Academic Press): 63ā88.
10.
MorganJ.R. (trans.) 1989āHeliodorus, āAn Ethiopian Storyāā, in ReardonB.P. (ed.), Collected Ancient Greek Novels (Berkeley: University of California Press): 353ā588.
11.
SandersE.P.1977Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
12.
StendahlKrister1976āThe Apostle Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the Westā, in Paul among Jews and Gentiles (Philadelphia: Fortress Press): 78ā96.
13.
WolfsonHarry A.1942āPhilo on Free Willā, HTR35.2: 131ā69.
