An increasing number of scholars situate the Gospel of Mark within the Pauline sphere of influence. The centrality of Mark’s Passion story may lend itself to this interpretation, and Mark’s Gospel is frequently read as a narrativization of the Pauline kerygma on the vicarious death of Jesus. I intend to challenge this academic paradigm, drawing attention to the areas where the similarities have been exaggerated or the major differences overlooked in comparisons between Paul and Mark on this theme. Against the supposition that Mark’s emphasis on the soteriological significance of the crucifixion of Jesus can only be explained with reference to Paul, I will argue that the evangelist’s social location on the margins may account for the preoccupation with the redemptive value of Jesus’ suffering.
ArnalWilliam2007 ‘“He is Going Before You to Galilee”: The Gospel of Mark as Reflection on Exile and Identity’, in BraunWilliMcCutcheonRussell T. (eds.), Introducing Religion: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Z. Smith (London: Equinox): 57-67.
2.
BaconBenjamin W.1919Is Mark a Roman Gospel? (HTS, 7; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
3.
BirdMichael F.2011 ‘Mark: Interpreter of Peter and Disciple of Paul’, in BirdMichael F.WillittsJoel (eds.), Paul and the Gospels: Christologies, Conflicts and Convergences (LNTS, 411; London: T&T Clark): 30-61.
4.
BreytenbachCilliers1989Versöhnung: Eine Studie zur paulinischen Soteriologie (WMANT, 60; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag).
5.
BreytenbachCilliers2010Grace, Reconciliation, Concord: The Death of Christ in Graeco-Roman Metaphors (NovTSup, 135; Leiden: Brill).
6.
BultmannRudolf1972The History of the Synoptic Tradition (trans. MarshallJohn; Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
7.
CaseyMaurice1999Aramaic Sources of Mark’s Gospel (SNTSMS, 102; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
8.
CaseyMaurice2010Jesus of Nazareth: An Independent Historian’s Account of his Life and Teaching (London: T&T Clark).
9.
CrossleyJames G.2011 ‘Mark, Paul and the Question of Influences’, in BirdMichael F.WillittsJoel (eds.), Paul and the Gospels: Christologies, Conflicts and Convergences (LNTS, 411; London: T&T Clark): 10-29.
10.
FentonJ.C.1955 ‘Paul and Mark’, in NinehamD.E. (ed.), Studies in the Gospels: Essays in Memory of R.H. Lightfoot (Oxford: Blackwell): 89-112.
11.
FredriksenPaula1991 ‘Judaism, the Circumcision of Gentiles and Apocalyptic Hope: Another Look at Galatians 1 and 2’, JTS42: 532-64.
12.
FreyJörg2005 ‘Probleme der Deutung des Todes Jesu in der neutestamentlichen Wissenschaft. Streiflichter zur exegetischen Diskussion’, in FreyJörgSchröterJens (eds.), Deutungen des Todes Jesu im Neuen Testament (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 3-50.
13.
FreyJörgSchröterJens (eds.) 2005Deutungen des Todes Jesu im Neuen Testament (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
14.
GoodacreMark2006 ‘Scripturalization in Mark’s Crucifixion Narrative’, in van OyenGeertShepherdTom (eds.), The Trial and Death of Jesus: Essays on the Passion Narrative in Mark (Leuven: Peeters): 33-47.
15.
GoulderMichael1994St. Paul versus St. Peter: A Tale of Two Missions (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
16.
GundryRobert H.1993Mark: A Commentary on his Apology for the Cross (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
17.
HengelMartin1985Studies in the Gospel of Mark (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
18.
HookerMorna D.1991The Gospel According to Saint Mark (BNTC; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
19.
IncigneriBrian J.2003The Gospel to the Romans: The Setting and Rhetoric of Mark’s Gospel (Biblical Interpretation, 65; Leiden: Brill).
20.
JohnsonEarl S.2000 ‘Mark 15,39 and the So-Called Confession of the Roman Centurion’, Biblia81: 406-13.
21.
KählerMartin1896Der sogenannte historische Jesus und der geschichtliche, biblische Christus (Leipzig: Deichert).
22.
LiewTat-Siong Benny1999Politics of Parousia: Reading Mark Inter(con)textually (Leiden: Brill).
MackBurton1988A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
25.
MarcusJoel2000a ‘Mark – Interpreter of Paul’, NTS46: 473-87.
26.
MarcusJoel2000bMark 1–8: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB; New York: Doubleday).
27.
MarcusJoel2009Mark 8–16: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB; New York: Doubleday).
28.
MartinRalph P.1978Mark: Evangelist and Theologian (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan).
29.
MasonSteve2009Josephus, Judaea and Christian Origins: Methods and Categories (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
30.
McKnightScot2005Jesus and his Death: Historiography, the Historical Jesus, and Atonement Theory (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press).
31.
MyersChed1988Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis).
32.
PeschRudolf1989Das Markusevangelium Teil 1: Einleitung und Kommentar zu Kap. 1,1 – 8,26. (HTKNT, 2; Freiburg: Herder).
33.
RoskamH.N.2004The Purpose of the Gospel of Mark in its Historical and Social Context (NTS, 114; Leiden: Brill).
34.
SchlundChristine2005 ‘Deutungen des Todes Jesu im Rahmen der Pesach-Tradition’, in FreyJörgSchröterJens (eds.), Deutungen des Todes Jesu im Neuen Testament (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 397-411.
35.
SchröterJens2007Von Jesus zum Neuen Testament: Studien zur urchristlichen Theologiegeschichte und zur Entstehung des neutestamentlichen Kanons (WUNT, 204; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
36.
SmithJonathan Z.1990Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
37.
TelfordW.R.1999The Theology of the Gospel of Mark (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
38.
TheissenGerd1992The Gospels in Context: Social and Political History in the Synoptic Tradition (trans. MaloneyLinda M.; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
39.
VersnelHenk S.2005 ‘Making Sense of Jesus’ Death. The Pagan Contribution’, in FreyJörgSchröterJens (eds.), Deutungen des Todes Jesu im Neuen Testament (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 213-94.
40.
WernerMartin1923Der Einfluss paulinischer Theologie im Markusevangelium: Eine Studie zur neutestamentlichen Theologie (Giessen: Töpelmann).
41.
Yarbro CollinsAdela2007Mark: A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
