Abstract
In E.P. Sanders’s generally positive re-examination of the religion reflected in Second Temple Jewish texts, 4 Ezra still fares badly as the ‘closest approach to legalistic works-righteousness which can be found in the Jewish literature of the period’ (Sanders 1977: 418). Bruce Longenecker criticizes 4 Ezra even more sharply as articulating a religion in which divine grace is ‘removed from the scene altogether’. This article seeks to correct such misperceptions of the place of grace in the theology and ethical imperative of 4 Ezra and of the author’s conceptions of Torah-observance as earning merit as opposed to responding to God’s grace gratefully. This leads, in turn, to a greater appreciation for the connection between receiving (and continuing in) God’s favor and making an appropriate response to God in Paul’s thought than is typically acknowledged.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
