This review article applauds Simon Gathercole and Mark Goodacre for presenting strong arguments in favour of the dependence of the Gospel of Thomas on the Synoptic Gospels. Their shared emphasis on Thomas as a second-century text drawing on Synoptic tradition does, nevertheless, raise wider questions about the author’s aims and the purpose of the text, whose series of sayings were probably intended as a medium to unlock the secrets to eternal life. A redaction-critical approach to Thomas can also open up a whole new field of questions about its setting and transmission history.
AsgeirssonJon Ma.DeConickApril D.UroRisto (eds.) 2005Thomasine Traditions in Antiquity: The Social and Cultural World of the Gospel of Thomas (Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies, 59; Leiden: Brill).
2.
BockDarrell L.WallaceDaniel B.2007Dethroning Jesus: Exposing Popular Culture’s Quest to Unseat the Biblical Christ (Nashville: Thomas Nelson).
3.
DaviesStevan L.1983aThe Gospel of Thomas and Christian Wisdom (New York: The Seabury Press).
4.
DaviesStevan L.1983b ‘Thomas: The Fourth Synoptic Gospel’, BA46/1: 6-9, 12-14.
5.
DeConickApril D.2005aThe Original Gospel of Thomas in Translation: With a Commentary and New English Translation of the Complete Gospel (London: T&T Clark).
6.
DeConickApril D.2005bRecovering the Original Gospel of Thomas: A History of the Gospel and its Growth (LNTS, 286; London: T&T Clark).
7.
DunderbergIsmo1997 ‘John and Thomas in Conflict?’, in TurnerJohn D.McGuireAnne (eds.), The Nag Hammadi Library after Fifty Years: Proceedings of the 1995 Society of Biblical Literature Commemoration (NHMS, 44; Leiden: Brill): 361-80.
8.
EhrmanBart D.1999Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
9.
EvansCraig A.2007Fabricating Jesus: How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press).
10.
FunkRobert W.. 1993The Five Gospels: What Did Jesus Really Say? The Search for the Authentic Words of Jesus (New York: MacMillan).
11.
GathercoleSimon2012The Composition of the Gospel of Thomas: Original Language and Influences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
12.
GoodacreMark2012Thomas and the Gospels: The Case for Thomas’s Familiarity with the Synoptics (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
13.
HurtadoLarry W.2006The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts and Christian Origins (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
14.
HurtadoLarry W.2008 ‘The Greek Fragments of the Gospel of Thomas as Artefacts: Papyrological Observations on Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 1, Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 654, and Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 655’, in FreyJörgPopkesEnno EdzardSchröterJens (eds.), Das Thomasevangelium: Entstehung-Rezeption-Theologie (BZNW, 157; Berlin: De Gruyter): 19-32.
15.
KingKaren L.2003What is Gnosticism? (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
16.
LambdinThomas1989 ‘The Gospel of Thomas’, in LaytonBentley (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codex II, 2-7: Together with XIII, 2*, Brit. Lib. Or.4926(1), and P.OXY. 1, 654, 655, I (Nag Hammadi Studies, 20; Leiden: Brill): 52-128.
17.
Leonhardt-BalzerJutta2008 ‘On the Redactional and Theological Relationship between the Gospel of Thomas and the Apocryphon of John’, in FreyJörgPopkesEnno EdzardSchröterJens (eds.), Das Thomasevangelium: Entstehung-Rezeption-Theologie (BZNW, 157; Berlin: De Gruyter): 251-71.
18.
LuijendijkAnneMarie2011 ‘Jesus says: “There is Nothing Buried that Will Not be Raised”.’ A Late-Antique Shroud with Gospel of Thomas Logion 5 in Context’, ZAC15: 389-410.
19.
MarjanenAntti (ed.) 2005Was there a Gnostic Religion? (Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, 87; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
20.
PagelsElaine1973The Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: Heracleon’s Commentary on John (Nashville: Abingdon Press).
21.
PagelsElaine2003Beyond Belief: The Secret Gospel of Thomas (New York: Random House).
22.
PattersonStephen J.1993The Gospel of Thomas and Jesus (Foundations and Facets; Sonoma, CA: Polebridge Press).
23.
PerrinNicholas2007Thomas: The Other Gospel (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
24.
PlischUwe-Karsten2008The Gospel of Thomas: Original Text with Commentary (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson).
25.
PuechHenri-Ch. 1954 ‘Un logion de Jésus sur bandelette funéraire’, Bulletin de la societé Ernest Renan, NS 3: 6-9.
26.
PuechHenri-Ch. 1955 ‘Un logion de Jésus sur bandelette funéraire’, Revue de l’histoire des religions147: 126-29.
27.
PuechHenri-Ch. 1978 ‘Un logion de Jésus sur bandelette funéraire’, in idem, En quête de la Gnose II: Sur l’Évangile selon Thomas (Paris: Gallimard): 60-64.
28.
QuispelGilles1966 ‘Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of the Hebrews’, NTS12: 371-82.
29.
WilliamsMichael A.1996Rethinking ‘Gnosticism’: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
