Discussions of the parable of the workers in the vineyard (Mt. 20.1-16) tend to rely on two key assumptions: (1) the parable eliminates ‘merit’ and replaces it with ‘grace’; (2) the parable is the hermeneutical key to all of Matthew’s other discussions of rewards, if not the entire New Testament. This article challenges these assumptions and offers a reassessment of divine recompense in Matthew. Matthew 19.16–20.16 does not set aside ‘merit’ in place of ‘grace’ but contrasts generous wages faithfully repaid by God with even more generous wages. The Gospel as a whole emphasizes that disciples must earn treasure in heaven and forgive others their debts to enter the kingdom; those who refuse to work and who refuse to forgive will be damned. At the same time, however, God’s repayment of deeds is not according to strict desert, but goes far beyond what workers have earned.
AndersonGary2009Sin: A History (New Haven: Yale University Press).
2.
BaurF.C.1864Vorlesungen über neutestamentiche Theologie (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).
3.
Beasley-MurrayG.R.1986Jesus and the Kingdom of God (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
4.
BlombergCraig1992 ‘Degrees of Reward in the Kingdom of Heaven?’, JETS35: 159-72.
5.
BornkammG.1963 ‘Der Lohngedanke im Neuen Testament’, in Studien zu Antike und Urchristentum: Gesammelte Aufsätze, II (2 vols.; Munich: Kaiser Verlag): 69-92.
6.
CarterWarren1994Households and Discipleship: A Study of Matthew 19–20 (JSNTSup, 103; Sheffield: JSOT Press).
7.
CharetteBlaine1992The Theme of Recompense in Matthew’s Gospel (JSNTSup, 79; Sheffield: JSOT Press).
8.
DaviesW.D.AllisonDale C.1988–1997A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew (3 vols.; ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
9.
DeissmannAdolf A.1903Bible Studies: Contributions Chiefly from Papyri and Inscriptions to the History of the Language, the Literature, and the Religion of Hellenistic Judaism and Primitive Christianity (trans. GrieveAlexander; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
10.
de RuG.1966 ‘The Conception of Reward in the Teaching of Jesus’, NovT8: 202-22.
11.
DoddC.H.1961The Parables of the Kingdom (New York: Scribner).
12.
EubankNathan2007 ‘Bakhtin and Lukan Politics. A Carnivalesque Reading of the Last Supper in the Third Gospel’, JGRChJ4: 32-54.
13.
EubankNathan2013Wages of Cross-Bearing and Debt of Sin: The Economy of Heaven in Matthew’s Gospel (BZNW, 196; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
14.
FranceR.T.2007The Gospel of Matthew (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
15.
GregoryBradley C.2010Like an Everlasting Signet Ring: Generosity in the Book of Sirach (Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature Studies, 2; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
16.
GrindheimSigurd2008 ‘Ignorance is Bliss: Attitudinal Aspects of the Judgment according to Works in Matthew 25:31-46’, NovT50: 313-31.
17.
HeinemannH.1948 ‘The Conception of Reward in Mat. XX. 1-16’, JJS1: 85-89.
18.
HezserCatherine1990Lohnmetaphorik und Arbeitswelt in Mt 20,1-16 (NTOA, 15; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
19.
HultgrenArland J.2000The Parables of Jesus: A Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
20.
JeremiasJoachim1954Die Gleichnisse Jesu (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
21.
KantImmanuel1907Metaphysik der Sitten (Philosophische Bibliothek, 42; Leipzig: Dürr’schen).
22.
KantImmanuel1925Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Philosophische Bibliothek, 41; Leipzig: Felix Meiner).
23.
KlijnA.F.J.1983 ‘2 (Syriac Apocalypse of) Baruch: A New Translation and Introduction’, in CharlesworthJames H. (ed.), The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (2 vols.; Garden City, NY: Doubleday): I, 615-52.
24.
KloppenborgJohn S.2009 ‘Agrarian Discourse and the Sayings of Jesus: “Measure for Measure” in Gospel Traditions and Agricultural Practices’, in LongeneckerBruce W.LiebengoodKelly D. (eds.), Engaging Economics: New Testament Scenarios and Early Christian Reception (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans): 104-28.
25.
LangT.J.2011 ‘“You will desire to see and you will not see [it]”: Reading Luke 17.22 as Antanaclasis’, JSNT33.3: 281-302.
26.
LuomanenPetri1998Entering the Kingdom of Heaven: A Study on the Structure of Matthew’s View of Salvation (WUNT, 11/101; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
27.
LuzUlrich1985–2002Das Evangelium nach Matthäus (4 vols.; EKKNT; Düsseldorf: Benziger).
28.
MargueratDaniel1995Le jugement dans l’évangile de Matthieu (2nd edn; MdB, 6; Geneva: Labor et Fides).
29.
OesterleyW.O.E.1938The Gospel Parables in the Light of the Jewish Background (London: SPCK).
30.
PenningtonJonathan T.2009Heaven and Earth in the Gospel of Matthew (repr. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic; first published 2007: NovTSup, 126; Leiden: Brill).
31.
PreiskerH.1967 ‘μισθός’, TDNT: IV, 712-28.
32.
ReickeBo1950 ‘The New Testament Conception of Reward’, in MenoudP.H.CullmannOscar (eds.), Aux sources de la tradition chrétienne: Mélanges offerts à M. Maurice Goguel (Bibliothèque théologique; Paris: Delachaux and Niestlé): 195-206.
33.
SahlinsMarshall2004Stone Age Economics (2nd edn; London: Routledge).
34.
SandersE.P.1977Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion (Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
35.
ScottBernard Brandon1989Hear then the Parable (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
36.
SimDavid C.1993 ‘The Meaning of παλιγγενεσία in Matthew 19.28’, JSNT50: 3-12.
37.
SnodgrassKlyne R.2008Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
38.
StrackH.L.BillerbeckP.1922–1961Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch (6 vols. Munich: C.H. Beck).
